Co-constructed Documentary Film: collaboration, dialogue, and performance in researching gender and contemporary art in Vietnam

References

• Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. edited. by M. Holquist; Translated. by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” Theatre Journal. 40(4):519–531. doi:10.2307/3207893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, Zoe. 2017. “Curator Statement: Spirit of Friendship.” Presented at the Spirit of Friendship, The Factory Contemporary Arts Centre. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, B.W. Lisa., and Helle Rydstrøm. 2004. Gender Practices in Contemporary Vietnam. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duong, Wendy. 2001. “Gender Equality and Women’s Issues in Vietnam: The Vietnamese Woman Warrior and Poet.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Association Journal. 10(2):191–326.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, Jennifer, and Loyce Caruthers. 2016. “Documentary Film: The Next Step in Qualitative Research to Illuminate Issues of Social Justice.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 15(6). Accessed 3 May 2018. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/601
   Google Scholar
• Friere, Paolo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Gieseking, Jen Jack, William Mangold. 2014. “Editors’ Introduction.” In Jen Jack Gieseking, William Mangold, and Cindi Katz, edited by. The People, Place, and Space Reader. London: Routledge; p. 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. Davydd. 2008. “Theoretical Research, Applied Research, and Action Research: The Deinstitutionalization of Activist Research.” In Charles Hale, edited by. Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 319–340.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, R. Charles. 2008. “Introduction.” In Charles Hale, edited by. Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Donna Haraway, edited by. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge; p. 199–223.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1986. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is Strong Objectivity” in Alcoff, Linda, and Elizabeth Potter, edited by. Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, p. 49–82
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, Nagy, Patricia Leavy Sharlene, and M. L. Yaiser. 2004. “Feminist Approaches to Research as a Process.: Reconceptualising Epistemology, Methodology and, Method.” In Sharlene N. Hesse-Biber and M. L Yaiser, edited by. Feminist Perspectives on Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, C. Dorothy, William Lachiotte, Debra Skinner, and Carole Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horner, K. Lindsey. 2016. “Co-constructing Research: A Critical Literature Review.” AHRC. Accessed 6 March 2018. https://connected-communities.org/index.php/project_resources/co-constructing-research-a-critical-literature-review/
   Google Scholar
• Jane, Kroger, and Vivienne Adair. 2008. “Symbolic Meanings of Valued Personal Objects in Dentity Transitions of Late Adulthood.” Identity. 8(1):5–24. doi:10.1080/15283480701787251.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasankar, K. P., and Anjali Monteiro. 2015. A Fly in the Curry: Independent Documentary Film in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• John, Hammersley, and Rachelle Knowles. 2016. “The Dialogic: Artwork as Method.” National Association of Fine Art Educators. Accessed 12 August 2018. http://www.nafae.org.uk/sites/default/files/presentations/knowles_hammersley_paper.pf
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, Stephen. 2001. “Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jürgen Habermas.” In P. Reason and H. Bradbury, edited by. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage Publications; p. 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, Grant H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, Grant. 2005. “Conversation Pieces: The Role of Dialogue in Socially Engaged Art.” In Zoya Kocur and Simon Leung, edited by. Theory in Contemporary Art since 1985. Massachusetts: Blackwell; p. 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kishore, Shweta. 2018. Indian Documentary Film and Filmmakers: Independence in Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krenn, Martin. 2013. “Interview with Grant Kester.” Accessed 5 June 2019. http://martinkrenn.net/the_political_sphere_in_art_practices/?page_id=1878
   Google Scholar
• Low, Yvonne. 2015. “Becoming Professional: Feminisms and the Rise of Women-centred Exhibitions in Indonesia.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art 15, no. 2; p. 210–24.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, David. 1998. Transcultural Cinema. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, David. 2006. The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannay, Dawn. 2013. “Who Put that on There … Why Why Why?’ Power Games and Participatory Techniques of Visual Data Production.” Visual Studies. 28(2):136–146. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2013.801635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Millner, Jacqueline, Catriona Moore, and Georgina Cole. 2015. “Art and Feminism: Twenty-First Century Perspectives”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art. 15(2):143–149. doi:10.1080/14434318.2015.1089816.
   Google Scholar
• Minh-ha, T. Trinh. 1991. When the Moon Waxes Red. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, T. Chandra. 1988. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Feminist Review. (30):61–88. doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Bill. 1991. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parashar, Swati. 2016. “Feminism and Postcolonialism: (En)gendering Encounters.” Ostcolonial Studies. 19(4):371–377. doi:10.1080/13688790.2016.1317388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patricia, Leavy, and Anne Harris. 2018. Contemporary Feminist Research from Theory to Practice. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Petrarca, Diane, and Janet Hughes. 2014. “Mobilising Knowledge via Documentary Filmmaking: Is the Academy Ready.” Mcgill Journal of Education. 49(3):561–582. doi:10.7202/1033547ar.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2013. Doing Visual Ethnography. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Griselda. 1992. “Painting, Feminism, History.” In Michèle Barrett and Anne Phillips, edited by. Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. California: Stanford University Press; p. 138–176.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, Jay. 1991. “Speaking For, Speaking About, Speaking With, or Speaking Alongside.” Visual Anthropology Review. 7:50–67. doi:10.1525/var.1991.7.2.50.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, Jay. 2000. Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, Nanette. 1991. “The Art Historical Canon: Sins of Omission.” In Donald Preziosi, edited by. The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 344–354.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, Sidney. R., Hoang Tu Anh, Vu Song Ha, Tran Hung Minh, Bui Thi Thanh Mai, and Pham Vu Thien. 2006. “Constructions of Gender in Vietnam: In Pursuit of the “Three Criteria”.” Culture, Health & Sexuality. 8(5):383–394. doi:10.1080/13691050600858924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stille, Saskia. 2011. “Framing Representations: Documentary Filmmaking as Participatory Approach to Research Inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. 8:101–108. doi:10.1080/15505170.2011.624922.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Nora A. 2005. “Why Have There Been No Great Vietnamese Artists?” Michigan Quarterly Review. 44(1). Accessed 12 July 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0044.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Nora A. 2004. Painters in Hanoi: An Ethnography of Vietnamese Art. Honolulu. University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Nora A., and Barbara Tran. 2007. Changing Identity: Recent Works by Women Artists from Vietnam. Washington, D.C.: International Arts & Artists.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, Ben. 2017. “In Vietnam, an Exhibition Reveals How Friendship Nourishes Artists.” Hyperallergic.com. Accessed 12 May 2019. https://hyperallergic.com/406087/in-vietnam-an-exhibition-reveals-how-friendship-nourishes-artists/
   Google Scholar
• Viet, Le. 2012. “Many Returns: Contemporary Vietnamese Diasporic Artists – Organisers in Ho Chi Minh City.” In Nora Taylor and Boreth Ly, edited by. Modern and Contemporary Southeast Asian Art: An Anthology. New York: Cornell University; p. 85–116.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, Thomas. 1986. “Show Us Life: Towards a History and Aesthetics of the Committed Documentary.” In Thomas Waugh, edited by. Show Us Life: Towards a History and Aesthetics of the Committed Documentary. Maryland: Scarecrow Press; p. 59–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Nicole. 2013. ‘Foundations, Movements and Dissonant Images: Documentary Film and Its Ambivalent Relations to the Nation State.’ In Routledge Handbook of Indian Cinemas, edited by K. Moti Gokulsing and Wimal Dissanayake, Abingdon: Routledge; p.910–948.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Martin, and Sally Brown. 2012. “Film-based Creative Arts Enquiry: Qualitative Researchers as Auteurs.” Qualitative Research Journal. 12(1):130–147. doi:10.1108/14439881211222787.
   Google Scholar