“Women need not apply”: Sylvia Earle, binary oscillations, and the ecofeminist rhetoric of Mission Blue

References

• “American Woman by the Guess Who.” Songfacts. Retrieved from: http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=446
   Google Scholar
• “Explorers, Bio: Sylvia Earle. National Geographic.” Retrieved from: http://www.nationalgeographic.com/explorers/bios/sylvia-earle/
   Google Scholar
• Albaladejo, Tomás. 2014. “Rhetoric and Discourse Analysis.” In Language Use in the Public Sphere: Methodological Perspectives and Empirical Applications, edited by IA Moreno, L Lamas, and VM Casado. Vol. 170: 19–61. New York, NY: Peter Lang Linguistic insights: Studies in Language and Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Florian, and Jörg Matthes. 2016. “Nature Documentaries, Connectedness to Nature, and Pro-Environmental Behavior.” Environmental Communication 10 (4): 453–472. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.993415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besel, Richard. 2011. “Feminism and Ecofeminism.” In Encyclopedia of American Environmental History, 530–532. New York, NY: Facts on File, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bile, Jeffrey. 2011. “The Rhetorics of Critical Ecofeminism: Conceptual Connection and Reasoned Response.” In Ecofeminism and Rhetoric: Critical Perspectives on Sex, Technology, and Discourse, edited by D. A. Vakoch, 1–30. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers Yochim, Emily, and Vesta T. Silva. 2013. “Everyday Expertise, Autism, and ‘Good’ Mothering in the Media Discourse of Jenny McCarthy.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 10 (4): 406–426. doi:10.1080/14791420.2013.841320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, Julia B. 2006. Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington, D.C.; London: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, Sylvia. [Sylvia] A. 2017, March 8. “I Applied to Be Part of the Tektite Living under Water Project in 1969.” It didn’t occur to me that women were not expected to apply – the form did not make that clear. Most scientists and divers at the time [Facebook status update]. Retrieved from: https://www.facebook.com/sylvia.a.earle/posts/1237559246339247:0
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia. 2019. Re-enchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, Greta. 2011. “Ecofeminism Revisited: Rejecting Essentialism and Re-placing Species in a Material Feminist Environmentalism.” Women’s Studies, Gender, and Sexuality 23 (2). Retrieved from: https://muse-jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.calpoly.edu/article/448630
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, Greta. 2015. “Ecofeminism and Climate Change.” Women’s Studies International Forum 4920–4933. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfyard, Kurt. 2014. “Review: MISSION BLUE, A Reflection On A Single Life As A Stand-In For All Life.” ScreenAnarchy, August 19. https://screenanarchy.com/2014/08/review-mission-blue-is-both-a-reflection-and-a-call-to-action.html.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, Dennis. 2014. “Film Review: ‘Mission Blue.’.” Variety. https://www.villagevoice.com/movies/mission-blue-4882170/ .
   Google Scholar
• Hauʹofa, Epeli. 2008. We are the Ocean: Selected Works. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hays, Sharon. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, Karen, and Karen Hughes. 2018. “Protecting the Great Barrier Reef: Analysing the Impact of a Conservation Documentary and Post-Viewing Strategies on Long-Term Conservation Behaviour.” Environmental Education Research 24 (4): 521–536. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1303820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howland, Daphne. 2014. “Mission Blue (NR).” The Village Voice , February 10.https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/mission-blue-santa-barbara-review-675979/
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Helen. 2014. Green Documentary: Environmental Documentary in the Twenty-First Century. Bristol Chicago: intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Kathleen P. 2014. “’It’s More than Planting Trees, It’s Planting Ideas’: Ecofeminist Praxis in the Green Belt Movement.” Southern Communication Journal 79 (3): 235–249. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2014.890245.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheons, Linda. 1994. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, David. 2000. Green Screen. Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Julia P. G., Laura Thomas‐Walters, Niki A. Rust, Diogo Veríssimo, and S. Januchowski‐Hartley. 2019. “Nature Documentaries and Saving Nature: Reflections on the New Netflix Series Our Planet.” Edited by Stephanie Januchowski‐Hartley. People and Nature 1 (4): 420–425. doi:10.1002/pan3.10052.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, Justin. 2014. “Mission Blue: Santa Barbara Review.” The Hollywood Reporter, January 31.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Katherine. 2012. “Mother: A Textual Analysis of Contemporary Mother Identities in Popular Discourse.” Marquette University Master’s Theses (2009 -). Retrieved from http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/142
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, Raymie E. 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.” Communication Monographs 56 (2): 91–111. doi:10.1080/03637758909390253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Carolyn. 1981. “Earthcare: Women and the Environmental Movement.” Environment 23 (5): 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mission Blue. 2014. Film. Directed by Robert Nixon and Fisher Stevens. United States: Netflix.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, Elizabeth R., and Heather E. Dillaway. 2005. “‘Staying at Home’ versus ‘Working’: A Call for Broader Conceptualizations of Parenthood and Paid Work.” Michigan Family Review 10 (1): 66. doi:10.3998/mfr.4919087.0010.105.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Richard A., and Julie Kalil Schutten. 2004. “The Gender of Water and the Pleasure of Alienation: A Critical Analysis of Visiting Hoover Dam.” The Communication Review 7 (3): 259–283. doi:10.1080/10714420490492166.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Ross. 2020. “Toward Intersectional Ecofeminist Communication Studies.” Communication Theory 30 (3): 268–289. doi:10.1093/ct/qtz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperb, Jason. 2016. “From Nihilism to Nostalgia: Blackfish (2013) and the Contradictions of the Nature Documentary.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 44 (4): 206–219. doi:10.1080/01956051.2016.1161587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearney, Lynn M. 1994. “Feminism, Ecofeminism, and the Maternal Archetype: Motherhood as a Feminine Universal.” Communication Quarterly 42 (2): 145–159. doi:10.1080/01463379409369923.
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, Jocelyn. 2010. “Gender Representations of Scientists.” In Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication. Vol. 1, 322–325. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vasques Vital, André. 2020. “Water, Gender, and Modern Science in the Steven Universe Animation.” Feminist Media Studies 20 (8): 1144–1158. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1662466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Karen J. 1990. “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism.” Environmental Ethics 12 (2): 125–146. doi:10.5840/enviroethics199012221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, Albert. 1982. “Towards a New Oceania.” In Writers in East-West Encounter, edited by G. Amirthanayagam. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 202–214 . doi:10.1007/978-1-349-04943-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Wilz, Kelly. 2010. “Rehumanization through Reflective Oscillation in Jarhead.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13 (4): 581–610. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0209.
   Google Scholar