Mapping an emerging hashtag ecosystem: connective action and interpretive frames in the Swedish #MeToo movement

References

• Askanius, Tina, and Jannie Møller Hartley. 2019. “Framing Gender Justice: A Comparative Analysis of the Media Coverage of #metoo in Denmark and Sweden.” NORDICOM Review: Nordic Research on Media and Communication 40 (2): 19–36. doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0022.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Internet Researchers. 2012. “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIr Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0).” Aoir.org. Accessed March 14, 2022. http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9781478002772.
   Google Scholar
• Barker-Plummer, Bernadette, and Dave Barker-Plummer. 2017. ”Hashtag Feminism, Digital Media, and New Dynamics of Social Change: A Case Study of #YesAllWomen.” In Social Media and Politics: A New Way to Participate in the Political Process, edited by Glenn W. Richardson, 79–96. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, Mathieu, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An Open-Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” In Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/13937/13786
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. ”The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” In Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139198752.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Andrea, and Kelsey Munro. 2017. “Why is the #MeToo Movement Sending Shockwaves Through Sweden?” SBS News, November 27. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/why-is-the-metoo-movement-sending-shockwaves-through-sweden
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier, Gwen. 2020. “Racist Call-Outs and Cancel Culture on Twitter: The Limitations of the Platform’s Ability to Define Issues of Social Justice.” Discourse, Context & Media 38: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandes, Ulrik. 2001. “A Faster Algorithm for Betweenness Centrality.” The Journal of mathematical sociology 25 (2): 163–177. doi:10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Rosemary. 2016. ““Hope in a Hashtag”: The Discursive Activism of #WhyIStayed.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (5): 788–804. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Parsons, Rosemary. 2021. ““I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU”: #MeToo and the Performance of Networked Feminist Visibility.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (3): 362–380. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Benedictis, Sara, Shani Orgad, and Catherine Rottenberg. 2019. “#MeToo, Popular Feminism and the News: A Content Analysis of UK Newspaper Coverage.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 22 (5–6): 718–738. doi:10.1177/1367549419856831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delin, Mikael. 2018.”Dokument: Metoo kan påverka – även om det inte blir en valfråga.” Dagens Nyheter, January 1. https://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/dokument-metoo-kan-paverka-aven-om-det-inte-blir-en-valfraga/
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Moa. 2018. “Pizza, Beer and Kittens: Negotiating Cultural Trauma Discourses on Twitter in the Wake of the 2017 Stockholm Attack.” New Media & Society 20 (11): 3980–3996. doi:10.1177/1461444818765484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson Krutrök, Moa, and Simon Lindgren. 2018. “Continued Contexts of Terror: Analyzing Temporal Patterns of Hashtag Co-Occurrence as Discursive Articulations.” Social Media + Society 4 (4): 205630511881364. doi:10.1177/2056305118813649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiesler, Casey, and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. ““Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics.” Social Media + Society 4 (1): 205630511876336. doi:10.1177/2056305118763366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2018. “The Shifting Terrain of Sex and Power: From the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ to #MeToo.” Sexualities 21 (8): 1313–1324. doi:10.1177/1363460718794647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg, Aric A., Daniel A. Schult, and Pieter J. Swart. 2008. “Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX.” In Proceedings of 7th Python in Science Conference SciPy Conference, edited by Gael Varoquaux, Travis Vaught, and Jarrod Millman, 11–15. Pasadena, CA, August 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Karin. 2020. ”#Metoo petitions in Sweden 2017–2019 (version V2).” (dataset). Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.2478/njms-2020-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Karin, Malin Sveningsson, Hillevi Ganetz, and Maria Sandgren. 2020. “Legitimising a Feminist Agenda: The #metoo petitions in Sweden 2017–2018.” Nordic Journal of Media Studies 2 (1): 121–132. doi:10.2478/njms-2020-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Karin, Malin Sveningsson, Maria Sandgren, and Hillevi Ganetz. 2019. “’We Passed the Trust on’: Strategies for Security in #MeToo Activism in Sweden.” In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The International Venue on Practice-Centred Computing and the Design of Cooperation Technologies – Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies. doi:10.18420/ecscw2019_ep14.
   Google Scholar
• Internetstiftelsen, The Swedish Internet Foundation. 2022. “Svenskarna och internet 2022.” Accessed October 21, 2022. https://svenskarnaochinternet.se/rapporter/svenskarna-och-internet-2022/
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Jilly Boyce. 2020. Gender, Media and Voice: Communicative Injustice and Public Speech. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47287-0.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lambiotte, Renaud, Jean-Charles Delvenne, and Mauricio Barahona. 2009. “Laplacian Dynamics and Multiscale Modular Structure in Networks.” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering 1 (2): 76–90. doi:10.1109/TNSE.2015.2391998.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, Annette. 2012. “Fabrication as Ethical Practice.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (3): 334–353. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medieakademin. 2021. “Maktbarometern.” Accessed January 22, 2022. https://medieakademin.se/maktbarometern/
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2018. “#MeToo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture Through Digital Feminist Activism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 25 (2): 236–246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, Samuel, and Johan Pries. 2019. “Translocalising and Relocalising Antifascist Struggles: From #KämpaShowan to #KämpaMalmö.” Antipode 51 (1): 248–270. doi:10.1111/anti.12451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, Richard. 2018. ”No Peace Prize: The Continuing Crisis Inside the Swedish Academy.” TLS Times Literary Supplement (6029): 24. Gale Academic OneFile. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A632754915/AONE?u=anon 76934357&sid=googleScholar&xid=63824b91
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, Ester. 2019. “Sweden and the #MeToo Movement.” Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 10 (3): 185–200. doi:10.1386/iscc.10.3.185_1.
   Google Scholar
• Salomonsson, Lisa. 2020. “Is #akademiuppropet a Kind of Digital Counter-Public?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 27 (1): 89–98. doi:10.1177/1350506819885708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serisier, Tanya. 2018. Speaking Out – Feminism, Rape and Narrative Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98669-2.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, David, Robert Benford, Holly McCammon, Lyndi Hewitt, and Scott Fitzgerald. 2014. “The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since ”Frame Alignment”.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19 (1): 23–46. doi:10.17813/maiq.19.1.x74278226830m69l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford Jr, S K. Worden, and R D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American sociological review 51 (4): 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stål, Kajsa, Magnus Abrahamsson, and Maria Höglund. (Executive Producers). 2021. “Metoo – hösten som förändrade Sverige [Metoo – The Autumn that Changed Sweden] [TV Documentary Series].” Brand New Content; SVT, Sveriges Television AB. https://www.svtplay.se/metoo-hosten-som-forandrade-sverige
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Maya, and Ulrike Schultze. 2019. “Producing Solidarity in Social Media Activism: The Case of My Stealthy Freedom.” Information and Organization 29 (3): 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suk, Jiyoun, Aman Abhishek, Yini Zhang, S Y. Yun Ahn, T. Correa, C. Garlough, and D V. Shah. 2021. “#MeToo, Networked Acknowledgment, and Connective Action: How “Empowerment Through Empathy” Launched a Social Movement.” Social science computer review 39 (2): 276–294. doi:10.1177/0894439319864882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiai Wayne, Xu. 2020. “Mapping Connective Actions in the Global Alt-Right and Antifa counterpublics.” International Journal of Communication 14. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar