No such thing as the female eye: ditching gender-binary categories in art perception

References

• Berger, John 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Edmund 1757. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origins of Our Idea of Sublime and Beautiful. London: R.J. Dodsley.
   Google Scholar
• Cela-Conde, Camilo J., Francisco J. Ayala, Enric Munar, Fernando Maestú, Marcos Nadal, Miguel A. Capó, David Del Río, et al. 2009. “Sex-Related Similarities and Differences in the Neural Correlates of Beauty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (10): 3847–3852. 10.1073/pnas.0900304106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers, Meredith L., Gerulf Rieger, Elizabeth Latty, and J. Michael Bailey. 2004. “A Sex Difference in the Specificity of Sexual Arousal.” Psychological Science 15 (11): 736–744. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, Valuch, Lena S. Pflüger, Bernard Wallner, Bruno Laeng, and Ulrich Ansorge. 2015. “Using Eye Tracking to Test for Individual Differences in Attention to Attractive Faces.” Frontiers in Psychology 42 (6): n.p. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00042
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Kenneth 1956. Venus. In the Nude: A Study in Ideal Form. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coutrot, Antoine, Nicola Binetti, Charlotte Harrison, Isabelle Mareschal, and Alan Johnston. 2016. “Face Exploration Dynamics Differentiate Men and Women.” Journal of Vision 16 (14): 1–19. doi:10.1167/16.14.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastlake, Elizabeth 1845. “Lady Travelers.” Quarterly Review 76: 98–137.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, A. W. 2008. “Feminist Philosophy of Art.” Philosophy Compass 3 (5): 873–893. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00154.x
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, A. W. 2021. “Feminist Aesthetics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy, edited by Kim Q. Hall and Ásta, 295–311. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Hilary. 2014. Girl Guides: Travel, Translation, Ekphrasis. In Women Writing Art History in the Nineteenth Century: Looking Like a Woman, 62–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Garb, Tamar 1993. “The Forbidden Gaze: Women Artists and the Male Nude in Late Nineteenth-Century France.” In The Body Imaged: The Human Form and Visual Culture in the Renaissance, edited by Kathleen Adler and Marcia R. Pointon, 33–42. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthwait, John T., ed. 1991. Kant’s Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Charlotte, Todd Hogue, and Kun Guo. 2011. “Differential Gaze Behavior Towards Sexually Preferred and Non-Preferred Human Figures.” The Journal of Sex Research 48 (5): 461–469. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.521899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, Carolyn, and Brand Weiser. Peg. 2021. “Feminist Aesthetics.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/feminism-aesthetics/
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, Thomas C., Katrin Sippel, Wolfgang Rosenstiel, Enkelejda Kasneci, Wolfgang Fuhl, and Guilherme Schievelbein. 2015. “Analysis of Eye Movements with Eyetrace.” In 8th International Joint Conference, BIOSTEC, Lisabon, Portugal, January 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Miyahira, Ayako, Kiichiro Morita, Hiroshi Yamaguchi, Kensaku Nonaka, and Hisao Maeda. 2000. “Gender Differences of Exploratory Eye Movements a Life Span Study.” Life Sciences 68 (5): 569–577. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00963-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Laura 1975. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (3): 6–18. doi:10.1093/screen/16.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Nochlin, Linda. 1971. “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” In Sexist Society: Studies in Power and Powerlessness, edited by Vivian Gornick and K. Moran Barbara, 480–510. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Caroline Elizabeth. 2009. “Women Writers on Art and Perceptions of the Female Connoisseur, 1780-1860.” Ph D. diss, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, Heather A., and Kim Wallen. 2008. “Sex Differences in Response to Visual Sexual Stimuli: A Review.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 37 (2): 206–218. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruskin, John 1900. “Of Queens’ Gardens.” In Sesame and Lilies, edited by A.B. Agnes Spofford Cook, 72–105. New York: Silver, Burdett and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sargezeh, Bahman Abdi, Niloofar Tavakoli, and Mohammad Reza Daliri. 2019. “Gender-Based Eye Movement Differences in Passive Indoor Picture Viewing: An Eye-Tracking Study.” Physiology & Behavior 206: 43–50. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopenhauer, Arthur 1990. “The Weakness of Woman.” In History of Ideas on Woman: A Source Book, edited by Rosemary Agonito, 191–230. New York: Perigee Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tröndle, Martin, Volker Kirchberg, and Wolfgang Tschacher. 2014. “Subtle Differences: Men and Women and Their Art Reception.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 48 (4): 65–93. doi:10.5406/jaesteduc.48.4.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar