Technocultural worldings: dialectical dynamics in contemporary media landscapes

References

• Abidin, Crystal. 2021. “From ‘Networked Publics’ to ‘Refracted Publics’: A Companion Framework for Researching ‘Below the Radar’ Studies.” Social Media + Society 7 (1): 20563051209844. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Amy. 2015. “Emancipation without Utopia: Subjection, Modernity, and the Normative Claims of Feminist Critical Theory.” Hypatia 30 (3): 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurs, Jane, Sophia Drakopoulou, and Alessandro Gandini. 2018. “Researching YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517737222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, Erik. 2013. “Time, History, and Literature.” In Selected Essays of Erich Auerbach, edited by James I. Porter, vii-266. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoub, Phillip M., and Kristina Stöckl. 2024. The Global Fight Against LGBTI Rights: How Transnational Conservative Networks Target Sexual and Gender Minorities. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baele, Stephane J., Lewy Brace, and Travis G. Coan. 2023. “Uncovering the Far-Right Online Ecosystem: An Analytical Framework and Research Agenda.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 46 (9): 1599–1623. 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1862895.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Moya, Sarah Jackson, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2019. “Women Tweet on Violence: From #YesAllWomen to #MeToo.” Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media & Technology 2019 (15): 15. https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/ada.2019.15.6.
   Google Scholar
• Băluţă, Oana. 2023. “What Is in a Name? Alternative Gender Knowledge and the Retrogressive Worlding of Radical Right Digital Media.” Feminist Media Studies 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2274280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah, Rosalind Gill, and Catherine Rottenberg. 2020. “Postfeminism, Popular Feminism and Neoliberal Feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in Conversation.” Feminist Theory 21 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1177/1464700119842555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Mareike Fenja. 2023. “Beauty, Baby and Backlash? Anti-Feminist Influencers on TikTok.” Feminist Media Studies 1–19. doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2263820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayramoğlu, Yener. 2021. “Remembering Hope: Mediated Queer Futurity and Counterpublics in Turkey’s Authoritarian Times.” New Perspectives on Turkey 64: 173–195. doi:10.1017/npt.2021.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blee, Kathleen. 2020. “Where Do We Go from Here? Positioning Gender in Studies of the Far Right.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 21 (4): 416–431. doi:10.1080/21567689.2020.1851870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Kath, Niharika Banerjea, Nick McGlynn, B. Sumita, Leela Bakshi, Rukmini Banerjee, and Ranjita Biswas. 2017. “Towards Transnational Feminist Queer Methodologies.” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (10): 1376–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1372374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Kath, and Catherine Nash. 2020. “Heteroactivism.” Lambda Nordica 25 (1): 72–80. https://doi.org/10.34041/ln.v25.616.
   Google Scholar
• Butzlaff, Felix. 2022. “Emancipatory Struggles and Their Political Organisation: How Political Parties and Social Movements Respond to Changing Notions of Emancipation.” European Journal of Social Theory 25 (1): 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211027111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, Pheng. 2014. “World Against Globe: Toward a Normative Concept of World Literature.” New Literary History 45 (3): 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholbi, Michael, Hogan Brandon, Madva Alex, and Yost Benjamin. 2021. The Movement for Black Lives: Philosophical Perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Tara. 2017. “Decoding Black Feminist Hashtags As Becoming.” The Black Scholar 43 (2): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2017.1330107.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, Diana. 2015. “Emancipation As a Three-Dimensional Process for the Twenty-First Century.” Hypatia 30 (3): 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damrosch, David. 2003. What Is World Literature?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Thom, Arshad Isakjee, and Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik. 2023. “Epistemic Borderwork: Violent Pushbacks, Refugees, and the Politics of Knowledge at the EU Border.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (1): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2022.2077167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devellennes, Charles. 2023. The Macron Régime: The Ideology of the New Right in France. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’haen, Theo. 2016. “Worlding World Literature.” Recherches littéraires/Literary Research 32: 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford, Robin. 2017. “Toward a Decolonial Global Ethics.” Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3): 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, Enrique. 2012. “Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of the Philosophy of Liberation.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1 (3): 28–59. https://doi.org/10.5070/T413012881.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federicci, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the Witch. New York, NY: Autonomedia Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2016. “Progressive Neoliberalism versus Reactionary Populism: A Choice That Feminists Should Refuse.” NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 24 (4): 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1278263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Elizabeth. 2005. “Time Binds, Or, Erotohistoriography.” Social Text 84-85: 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Elizabeth J., and Anna Laura Rodríguez Gustá. 2023. ““Welcome to the Revolution”: Promoting Generational Renewal in Argentina’s Ni Una Menos.” Qualitative Sociology 46 (2): 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-023-09530-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, Veronia. 2020. Feminist International. How to Change Everything. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gago, Veronica, and Raquel Guitérrez Aguilar. 2018. “Women Rising in Defense of Life: Tracing the Revolutionary Flows of Latin American Women’s Many Uprisings.” NACLA Report on the Americas 50 (4): 364–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2018.1550978.
   Google Scholar
• Gasché, Rodolphe. 2009. Europe, or the Infinite Task: A Study of a Philosophical Concept. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, Dorit. 2021. “Orbán’s Ordonationalism As Post-Neoliberal Hegemony.” Theory, Culture & Society 38 (6): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276421999435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2022. Abolition Geography: Essays Towards Liberation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, Paul. 2004. After Empire. Melancholia or Convivial Culture?. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ging, Debbie, and Eugenia Siapera. 2018. “Special Issue on Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, Agnieszka, and Elżbieta Korolczuk. 2022. Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 1962 [1927]. Being and Time. London: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson, Patrik, David Lawrence, Joe Mulhall, and Simon Murdoch. 2020. The International Alt-Right: Fascism for the 21st Century?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Thung-Hui. 2022. Digital Lethargy. Massachussets: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Jonas. 2017. “Public Spheres of Skepticism: Climate Skeptics’ Online Comments in the German Networked Public Sphere.” International Journal of Communication 11: 1661–1682. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5557/1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi Ooryad, Sama. 2022. “To Take My/Our Past and Future Selves Back: Woman, Life, Freedom.” MAI Feminism 28: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi Ooryad, Sama. 2024a. “Memebodiment.” In Spaces – Bodies – Revolts. Emerging Digital Cultures, Feminist Struggles, and Global Change, edited by Sama Khosravi Ooryad, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander, 20–40. London: MAI Press/Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravi Ooryad, Sama. 2024b. “Memeing Back at Misogyny: Emerging Memefeminism, Visual Tactics, and Aesthetic Worldbuilding on Iranian Social Media.” Feminist Media Studies 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2319423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi Ooryad, Sama, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander. 2024. “Introduction.” In Emerging Digital Cultures: Feminist Struggles and Global Change. Spaces. Bodies. Revolts, edited by Sama Khosravi Ooryad, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander, 3–2+. London: MAI Press/Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kiliç, Onur. 2024. “Transforming Queer Spaces in Changing Paradigms of In/Visibility.” In Emerging Digital Cultures: Feminist Struggles and Global Change. Spaces. Bodies. Revolts, edited by Sama Khosravi Ooryad, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander, 89–104. London: MAI Press/Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Knops, Louise, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2019. “The Radical Right versus the Media: From Media Critique to Claims of (Mis)representation.” Politics & Governance 7 (3): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasteva, Anna, and Gabriella Lazaridis. 2016. “Far Right: Populist Ideology, ‘Othering’ and Youth.” In Populism, Media and Education: Challenging Discrimination in Contemporary Digital Societies, edited by Maria Ranieri, 9–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liinason, Mia. 2023. “‘The Loved Home’ and Other Exclusionary Care Discourses: A Multiscalar and Transnational Analysis of Heteroactivist Resistances to Gender and Sexual Rights in Sweden.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 22 (3): 1047–1068. https://doi.org/10.7202/1102112ar.
   Google Scholar
• Liinason, Mia. 2024a. “Bodies As Tactics.” In Spaces – Bodies – Revolts. Emerging Digital Cultures, Feminist Struggles, and Global Change, edited by Sama Khosravi Ooryad, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander, 40–63. London: MAI Press/Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Liinason, Mia. 2024b. “The Performance of Protest: Las Tesis and the New Feminist Radicality at the Conjunction of Digital Spaces and the Streets.” Feminist Media Studies 24 (3): 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2200472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Shana, Brianna I. Wiens, Michelle Macarthur, and Milena Radzikowska, eds. 2021. Networked Feminisms: Activist Assemblies and Digital Practices. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Ngok, and Edmund W. Cheng. 2019. The Umbrella Movement: Civil Resistance and Contentious Space in Hong Kong. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, Ico. 2019. “New Right Metapolitics and the Algorithmic Activism of Schild & Vrienden.” Social Media + Society 5 (2): 205630511985670. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen. 1991. “A Global Sense of Place.” Marxism Today 38: 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mina, An Xiao. 2019. Memes to Movements: How the World’s Most Viral Media Is Changing Social Protest and Power. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London & New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nadia, Ruiz-Bravo. 2024. “Cultivating Digital Safe Spaces to Promote Emancipatory Practices.” In Emerging Digital Cultures: Feminist Struggles and Global Change. Spaces. Bodies. Revolts, edited by Sama Khosravi Ooryad, Mia Liinason, and Lisen Selander, 76–89. London: MAI Press/Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian. 2022. “Gendering Web2.0 Sociotechnical Affordances of Far-Right Metapolitics.” Social Media + Society 8 (3): 205630512211080. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221108076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian. 2023. “Research Bricolage on Far-Right Metapolitics: Superordinate Intersectionality Perspectives on Digital Identities.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2292954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian, and Ionela Băluță. 2023. “Retrogressive Mobilization in the 2018 ‘Referendum for Family’ in Romania.” Problems of Post-Communism 70 (2): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1987270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian, and David Paternotte. 2023. “The Dis/Articulation of Anti-Gender Politics in Eastern Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 70 (2): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2023.2176075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian, and Katarina Pettersson. 2023. “Anti-Gender Politics in Finland and Romania.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16832281009645.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Onook, Chanyoung Eom, and H. R. Rao. 2015. “Research Note —Role of Social Media in Social Change: An Analysis of Collective Sense Making During the 2011 Egypt Revolution.” Information Systems Research 26 (1): 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omura, Keiichi, Grant Jun Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsuro Morita (eds.). 2019. The World Multiple: The Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Onur Kilic. 2023. “Add the Following Reference in the References List: Kilic.” Onur 26 (7): 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607211060510.
   Google Scholar
• Otsuki, Grant Jun, Shiho Satsuka, Keiichi Omura, and Atsuro Morita. 2019a. “Introduction.” In The World Multiple: The Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds, edited by Keiichi Omura, Grant Jun Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsuro Morita, 1–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Özkula, Suay Melisa, Patricia Prieto-Blanco, Xuanxuan Tan, and Norita Mdege. 2024. “Affordances and Platformed Visual Misogyny: A Call for Feminist Approaches in Visual Methods.” Feminist Media Studies 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2311355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternotte, David, and Roman Kuhar. 2018. “Disentangling and Locating the ‘Global Right’: Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe.” Politics & Governance 6 (3): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, Joshua. 2021. “‘Because for Us, As Europeans, it is Only Normal Again When We are Great Again’: Metapolitical Whiteness and the Normalization of White Supremacist Discourse in the Wake of Trump.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 44 (13): 2328–2349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1922730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Henry. 2023. “Anti-Feminism as Anti-Establishment and Emancipatory: The Gendered Metapolitics of Incel.” Feminist Media Studies 1–17. doi:10.1080/14680777.2023.2291314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebughini, Paolo. 2015. “Framing Emancipations.” Journal of Classical Sociology 15 (3): 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X14558768.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, Susanne. 2023a. “Discourse Coalitions Against Gender and Sexual Equality: Antifeminism as a Common Denominator Between the Radical Right and the Mainstream?” Feminist Media Studies 23 (6): 2831–2848. doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2093937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, Susanne. 2023b. “Distinct Information Ecologies? Gender Knowledge Production in German Digital Legacy and Counterpublic Media.” Feminist Media Studies 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2272056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, Jessica, and Emilie Lawrence. 2018. “Remixing Misandry, Manspreading, and Dick Pics: Networked Feminist Humour on Tumblr.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Richard. 2020. “Deplatforming: Following Extreme Internet Celebrities to Telegram and Alternative Social Media.” European Journal of Communication 35 (3): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Robert A., Rhys Crilley, and Precious N. Chatterje-Doody. 2022. “ICYMI: RT and Youth-Oriented International Broadcasting as (Geo)political Culture Jamming.” The International Journal of Press/politics 27 (3): 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211072771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharff, Christina, Carrie Smith-Prei, and Maria Stehle. 2016. “Digital Feminisms.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1093069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schields, Rob. 2002. The Virtual. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Segato, Rita. 2003. Las estructuras elementales de la violencia. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Shao, and Guanqin He. 2024. “After Account Bombing: Chinese Digital Feminists Haunt Platform Censorship As Cyber Living Ghosts.” Feminist Media Studies 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2024.2311362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Sanjay 2012. “Black Twitter? Racial Hashtags, Networks and Contagion.” New Formations 78 (78): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF.78.02.2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, Limor. 2013. Memes in Digital Culture. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri C. 1985. “The Rani of Sirmur: An Essay in Reading the Archives.” History and Theory 24 (3): 247–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, Barbara. 2010. Bodies in Crisis: Culture, Violence, and Women’s Resistance in Neoliberal Argentina. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ticktin, Miriam. 2008. “Sexual Violence As the Language of Border Control: Where French Feminist and Anti-Immigrant Rhetoric Meet.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 33 (4): 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/528851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trend, David. 2016. Worlding: Identity, Media, and Imagination in a Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, Anna. 2010. “Or, Can Actor–Network Theory Experiment with Holism?” In Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology, edited by Ton Otto and Nils Bubandt, 47–66. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Welland, Sasha Su-Ling. 2018. Experimental Beijing: Gender and Globalization in Chinese Art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaremberg, Gisela, Constanza Tabbush, and Elisabeth Jay Friedman. 2021. “Feminism(s) and Anti-Gender Backlash: Lessons from Latin America.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 23 (4): 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2021.1956093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller, Johannes, and Tung-Hui Hu. 2023. “Digital Capitalism Fakes Empowerment.” Zeitgeister: The Cultural Magazine of the Goethe-Institute, June, https://www.goethe.de/prj/zei/en/art/24856015.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, Mei. 2012. “Worlding Oneness: Daoism, Heidegger, and Possibilities for Treating the Human.” Social Text 29 (4): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-1416109.
   Google Scholar
• Zienkowski, Jan. 2019. “Politics and the Political in Critical Discourse Studies: State of the Art and a Call for an Intensified Focus on the Metapolitical Dimension of Discursive Practice.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (2): 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1535988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar