Dialogic struggles and pedagogic innovation

References

• Alexander, Robin J. 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Robin J. 2004. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. England: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Atjonen, P., E. Korkeakoski, and J. Mehtäläinen. 2011. “Key Pedagogical Principles and Their Major Obstacles as Perceived by Comprehensive School Teachers.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (3): 273–288.10.1080/13540602.2011.554698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baetens-Beardsmore, H. 2008. “Multilingualism, Cognition and Creativity.” International CLIL Research Journal 1: 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, Four Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Texas: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1993. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Texas: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, F., J. Leach, and B. Moon. 1999. “New Understandings of Teachers’ Pedagogic Knowledge.” In Learners and Pedagogy, edited by J. Leach and B. Moon, 89–110. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 2008. “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” In Exploring Talk in Schools, edited by N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 1–16. England: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Wilfred, and Kemmis Stephen. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London and Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 1999. “Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities.” Review of Research in Education 24: 249–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coonan, C. M. 2007. “Insider Views of the CLIL Class through Teacher Self-Observation-Introspection.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10 (5): 625–646.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2006. “Content and Language Integrated Learning Motivating Learners and Teachers.” Scottish Languages Review 13. Accessed March 10, 2009. http://www.scilt.stir.ac.uk/slr/index.php?p=issueandissue=13
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2007. “The CLIL Quality Challenge.” In Diverse Contexts – Converging Goals, edited by D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 47–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204.10.1017/S0267190511000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2005. “Relational Agency: Learning to Be a Resourceful Practitioner.” International Journal of Educational Research 43: 168–182.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Edwards‐Groves, C., R. Kemmis, I. Hardy, and P. Ponte. 2010. “Relational Architectures: Recovering Solidarity and Agency as Living Practices in Education.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 18 (1): 43–54.10.1080/14681360903556814
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, C. 1996. “Keeping the Self Intact during the Cultural Wars: A Centennial Essay for Mikhail Bakhtin.” New Literary History, suppl. Special Issue on “Living Along Together” 27 (1): 107–126.10.1353/nlh.1996.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0_integral/071EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Graaff, H. C. J., G. J. de Koopman, and G. J. Westhoff. 2007. “Identifying Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Vienna English Working Papers 16 (3): 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 1996. “Learning as a Prosaic Act.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3 (2): 102–118.10.1207/s15327884mca0302_3
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, Michael. 1990. Bakhtin and his World. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203330340
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. 2004. “Investigating Students’ Beliefs about Their Preferred Role as Learners.” Educational Research 46 (3): 310–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2006. Dialogue in Schools: Towards a Pragmatic Approach, Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies Paper 33.
   Google Scholar
• Lehti, L., H.-M. Järvinen and E. Suomela-Salmi. 2006. “Kartoitus Vieraskielisen Opetuksen Tarjonnasta Peruskouluissa Ja Lukioissa [Mapping FL-Learning in Comprehesive and High Schools].” In Kielenoppija tänään [Language Learners of Today], edited by Päivi Pietilä, Pekka Lintunen, and Heidi-Marja Järvinen, 293–313. Jyväskylä, Finland: AFinLA.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, Max. 1991. The Tact of Teaching. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, Ivana, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, and S. Anne Orvig. 2007. Dialogue in Focus Groups. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Masih, J. 1999. “Forward.” In Learning through a Foreign Language – Models, Methods and Outcomes, edited by John Masih, 8–12. CILT: Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Neil, and Karen Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of children’s Thinking, a Sociocultural Approach. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Finland. 2009. Strategy for the Internationalisation of Higher Education Institutions in Finland 2009–2015. Department for Education and Science Policy. http://www.okm.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2009/liitteet/opm23.pdf?lang=fi.
   Google Scholar
• Moate, J. 2011. “Reconceptualising the Role of Talk in CLIL.” Journal of Applied Language Studies 6 (2): 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, Eduardo, and Phil Scott. 2003. Making Meaning in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T. 2007. “The IRF Pattern and Space for Interaction: Comparing CLIL and EFL Classrooms.” In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse, edited by Christiane Dalton-Puffer and Ute Smit, 170–204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, J. 2000. “Transfer to and Study at Secondary School in Finnish School Culture: Developing Schools on the Basis of pupils’ Experiences.” International Journal of Educational Research 33: 383–400.10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00024-0
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Wolff-Michael. 2002. Being and Becoming in the Classroom. (Issues in Curriculum, Theory, Policy and Research). Westport, USA: Ablex Publishing Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W., and S. A. Colby. 2007. “Teaching for Deep Learning.” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 80 (5): 205–210.10.3200/TCHS.80.5.205-210
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Paul. 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis Using a Dialogical Approach. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., and J. McCarthy. 2004. “Toward a Dialogical Perspective on Agency.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3): 291–309.10.1111/jtsb.2004.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, Len. 2001. Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar