A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations

References

• Bandura, Albert. 1982. “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.” American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822388128.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert, Mark Priestley, and Sarah Robinson. 2015. “The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (6): 624–640. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, Gert, Mark Priestley, and Sarah Robinson. 2017. “Talking about Education: Exploring the Significance of Teachers’ Talk for Teacher Agency.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 49 (1): 38–54. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1205143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, Russell, Mere Berryman, Tom Cavanagh, and Lani Teddy. 2009. “Te Kotahitanga: Addressing Educational Disparities Facing Māori Students in New Zealand.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (5): 734–742. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, Jill, Debra Bateman, Anne Cloonan, Mary Dixon, Jill Loughlin, Jo O’Mara, and Kim Senior. 2011. Innovative Learning Environments Research Study. Final Report. Accessed January 7, 2017. www.learningspaces.edu.au/docs/learningspaces-final-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Annette, Meg Maguire, and Stephen J. Ball. 2010. “Policy Enactments in the UK Secondary School: Examining Policy, Practice and School Positioning.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (4): 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Ian. 2015. “Assemblage Theory and Its Discontents.” Deleuze Studies 9 (3): 382–392. doi:10.3366/dls.2015.0193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, Terry, Wesley Imms, and Elizabeth Hartnell-Young. 2014. “Making the Case for Space: The Effect of Learning Spaces on Teaching and Learning.” Curriculum and Teaching 29 (1): 5–19. doi:10.7459/ct/29.1.02.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2013. “The World of Attachment? The Post-humanist Challenge to Freedom and Necessity.” Millennium 41 (3): 516–534. doi:10.1177/0305829813481840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, Jennifer. 2014. “Agency as Dynamic and Rhizomatic: An Exploration of Learner Identities in Two Secondary Classrooms.” Thesis, Doctor of Education (EdD). University of Waikato, Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, Jennifer, and Dianne Smardon. 2015. “Teacher Agency and Dialogic Feedback: Using Classroom Data for Practitioner Inquiry.” Teaching and Teacher Education 50: 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, Jennifer, and Eryn Thomas. 2016. “Uncovering ‘Unwelcome Truths’ through Student Voice: Teacher Inquiry into Agency and Student Assessment Literacy.” Teaching Education 28 (2): 162–177. doi:10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.doi:10.1215/9780822392996.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniawski, Gerry. 2012.“Repositioning Trust: AChallenge to Inauthentic Neoliberal Uses of Pupil Voice.”Management in Education 26 (3): 130–139. doi:10.1177/0892020612445685.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2000. A Body of Writing 1989–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Bronwyn. 2006. “Subjectification: The Relevance of Butler’s Analysis for Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 27 (4): 425–438. doi:10.1080/01425690600802907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Bronwyn, and Peter Bansel. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (3): 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751.
   Google Scholar
• Deed, Craig, and Thomas Lesko. 2015. “‘Unwalling?’ The Classroom: Teacher Reaction and Adaptation.” Learning Environments Research 18: 217–231. doi:10.1007/s10984-015-9181-6.
   Google Scholar
• Delgarno, Barney. 2014. Polysynchronous Learning: A Model for Student Interaction and Engagement. Accessed January 7, 2017. ascilite2014.otago.ac.nz/files/concisepapers/255-Dalgarno.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, Carol S. 1986. “Motivational Processes Affecting Learning.” American Psychologist 41: 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, Carol S. 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Anne. 2005. “Relational Agency: Learning to Be a Resourceful Practitioner.” International Journal of Educational Research 43 (3): 168–182. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Anne. 2010. Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3969-9.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Anne. 2011. “Building Common Knowledge at the Boundaries between Professional Practices: Relational Agency and Relational Expertise in Systems of Distributed Expertise.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (1): 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö, and Virginia Escalante. 1996. “Mundane Tool or Object of Affection? The Rise and Fall of the Postal Buddy.” In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, edited by B. A. Nardi, 325–373. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-364-3.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Kenn. 2016a. The Translational Design of Schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Kenn. 2016b. “Emerging Evaluation Knowledge in New Generation Learning Environments.” In Evaluating Learning Environments: Snapshots of Emerging Issues, Methods and Knowledge, edited by Wesley Imms, Ben Cleveland and Kenn Fisher, 165–179. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, Kellee. 2015. Are Your School Interiors Giving You a Pedagogical Edge? Accessed January 9, 2017. e21le.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Terrains2015WebSmall.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, Margaret. 2016. “Assessment for Learning: Co-Regulation in and as Student–Teacher Interaction.” In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. Volume 4 of the Series the Enabling Power of Assessment, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal, 327–343. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Imms, Wesley, Benjamin Cleveland, and Kenn Fisher. 2016. “Pursuing That Elusive Evidence about What Works in Learning Environment Design.” In Evaluating Learning Environments, edited by Wesley Imms, Ben Cleveland and Kenn Fisher, 3–17. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1.
   Google Scholar
• Istance, David. 2015. Schooling Redesigned: Towards Innovative Learning Systems. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Istance, David, and Marco Kools. 2013. “OECD Work on Technology and Education: Innovative Learning Environments as an Integrating Framework.” European Journal of Education 48 (1): 43–57. doi:10.1111/ejed.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Alecia Youngblood, and Lisa A. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Alecia Y., and Lisa A. Mazzei. 2013. “Plugging One Text into Another.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (4): 261–271. doi:10.1177/1077800412471510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Alecia Youngblood, and Lisa A. Mazzei. 2016. “Thinking with an Agentic Assemblage in Posthuman Inquiry.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by Carol Taylor and Christina Hughes, 93–107. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alison, and Te Kawehau Hoskins. 2016. “A Mark on Paper: The Matter of Indigenous-settler History.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by Carol Taylor and Christina Hughes, 75–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V. 2009. “Assessment for Learning Revisited: An Asia-Pacific Perspective.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 16 (3): 263–268. doi:10.1080/09695940903319646.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, James P. 2000. “Introducing Sociocultural Theory.” In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, edited by James Lantolf, 1–26. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, Jane. 2004. “Spatiality and the Place of the Material in Schools.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 12 (3): 347–372. doi:10.1080/14681360400200207.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, Amy, and Sue Saltmarsh. 2016. “Bodies and Affect in Non-traditional Learning Spaces.” Educational Philosophy and Theory. 1–10. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1252904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Elizabeth R. 2015. “The Ideology of Learner Agency and the Neoliberal Self.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 26 (3): 348–365. doi:10.1111/ijal.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOE (Ministry of Education). 2015a. Flexible Learning Spaces in Schools. Accessed August 15, 2016. https://www.education.govt.nz/school/property/state-schools/design-standards/flexible-learning-spaces/
   Google Scholar
• MOE (Ministry of Education). 2015b. The Ministry of Education Four Year Plan. 2015–2019. Accessed August 15, 2016. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Publications/MOE-Four-Year-Plan-2015-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MOE (Ministry of Education). 2016a. Flexible Learning Spaces. How the Design of Spaces Can Help Student Achievement. Accessed August 15, 2016. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/School-property-design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-How-the-design-of-spaces-can-help-student-achievement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MOE (Ministry of Education). 2016b. The Impact of Physical Design on Student Outcomes. Accessed August 15, 2016. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/School-property-design/Flexible-learning-spaces/FLS-The-impact-of-physical-design-on-student-outcomes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moller, Arlen C., Richard M. Ryan, and Edward L. Deci. 2006. “Self-determination Theory and Public Policy: Improving the Quality of Consumer Decisions without Using Coercion.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 25 (1): 104–116. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.1.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne. 2016. “Policy Matters: De/Re/Territorialising Spaces of Learning in Victorian Government Schools.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (1): 81–97. doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1099077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne, Ben Cleveland, and Helen Aberton. 2015. “Learning Spaces and Pedagogic Change: Envisioned, Enacted and Experienced.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (4): 575–595. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne, and Carol Morrison. 2017. “Re/Assembling ‘Innovative’ Learning Environments: Affective Practice and Its Politics.” Educational Philosophy and Theory. 749–758. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1278354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. 2016. The Education Review Office. School Evaluation Indicators. Accessed May 20, 2017. https://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/ERO-15968-School-Evaluation-Indicators-2016-v10lowres.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Mark, Gert Biesta, and Sarah Robinson. 2013. “Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum.” In Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice, edited by Mark Priestley and Gert Biesta, 186–206. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Mark, Richard Edwards, Andrea Priestley, and Kate Miller. 2012. “Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre.” Curriculum Inquiry 42 (2): 191–214. Accessed January 9, 2017. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/3119/1/The%20role%20of%20teacher%20agency%20in%20curriculum%20making_final.pdf. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, Johnmarshall. 2013. “How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3): 579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 1993. “Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism.” Economy and Society 22 (3): 283–299. doi:10.1080/03085149300000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 2013. “The Human Sciences in a Biological Age.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/0263276412456569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, Guy, Avi Assor, Yaniv Kanat-Maymon, and Haya Kaplan. 2007. “Autonomous Motivation for Teaching: How Self-determined Teaching May Lead to Self-determined Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (4): 761–774. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royle, Karl, Sarah Stager, and John Traxler. 2014. “Teacher Development with Mobiles: Comparative Critical Factors.” Prospects 44 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1007/s11125-013-9292-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2000. “Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being.” American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, Jaap, Thea Peetsma, and Ineke van der Veen. 2012. “Self-regulated Learning and Students? Perceptions of Innovative and Traditional Learning Environments: A Longitudinal Study in Secondary Education.” Educational Studies 38 (4): 397–413. doi:10.1080/03055698.2011.643105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, Dale H., and Barry J. Zimmerman. 2007. “Influencing Children’s Self-efficacy and Self-regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling.” Reading and Writing Quarterly 23 (1): 7–25. doi:10.1080/10573560600837578.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spittle, Michael, Kevin Jackson, and Meghan Casey. 2009. “Applying Self-determination Theory to Understand the Motivation for Becoming a Physical Education Teacher.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2000. “Poststructural Feminism in Education: An Overview.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (5): 477–515. doi:10.1080/09518390050156422.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth. 2016. “Rethinking the Empirical in the Posthuman.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by C. Taylor and C. Hughes, 25–36. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, Heather. 2001. “Understanding and Overstanding: Feminist-poststructural Life Histories of Physical Education Teachers.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 14 (1): 13–31. doi:10.1080/0269172001009744.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Carol A. 2016. “Edu-crafting a Cacophonous Ecology: Posthumanist Research Practices for Education.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by Carol Taylor and Christina Hughes, 5–24. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. Taylor, and Kalervo N. Gulson. 2015. Policy, Geophilosophy and Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-142-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, Michael L., Karrie A. Shogren, Susan B. Palmer, Kendra L. Williams-Diehm, Todd D. Little, and Aaron Boulton. 2012. “The Impact of the Self-determined Learning Model of Instruction on Student Self-determination.” Exceptional Children 78 (2): 135–153. doi:10.1177/001440291207800201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, Jill. 2009. “Assessment for Learning: A Sociocultural Approach.” In Proceedings of Changing Climates : Education for Sustainable Futures: Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia 30 November – 4 December 2008. 1–10. Accessed 15 August 2016. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/29323/.
   Google Scholar