2,135
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sensitivities in history teaching across Europe and Israel

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abens, A. 2011. “Effects of Authoritarianism on the Teaching of Latvian History.” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Latvia.
  • Abu-Hamdan, T., and F. Khader. 2014. “Social Studies Teachers’ Perceptions on Teaching Contemporary Controversial Issues.” American International Journal of Contemporary Research 4 (10): 70–78.
  • Bentrovato, D. 2017. “Accounting for Genocide: Transitional Justice, Mass (Re)Education and the Pedagogy of Truth in Present-Day Rwanda.” Comparative Education 53 (3): 396–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1317997.
  • Camicia, S. P. 2008. “Deciding What Is A Controversial Issue: A Case Study of Social Studies Curriculum Controversy.” Theory and Research in Social Education 36 (4): 298–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2008.10473378.
  • Chikoko, V., J. D. Gilmour, C. Harber, and J. Serf. 2011. “Teaching Controversial Issues and Teacher Education in England and South Africa.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 37 (1): 5–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538268.
  • Eid, N. 2010. “The Inner Conflict: How Palestinian Students in Israel React to the Dual Narrative Approach Concerning the Events of 1948.” Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society 2 (1): 55–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2010.020104.
  • Eini-ElHadaf, Y. 2011. “Jewish Adolescents Coping with Two Historical Narratives.” In Junctions- Ways of Psychological-Social Reflection on Hebrew Society, edited by T. Litvak Hirsch and G. Zeitlin, 108–113. BeerSheva: BeerSheva University Press.
  • Evans, R. W., P. G. Avery, and P. V. Pederson. 1999. “Taboo Topics: Cultural Restraint on Teaching Social Issues.” The Social Studies 90 (5): 218–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999909602419.
  • Freedman, S. W., H. M. Weinstein, K. Murphy, and T. Longman. 2008. “Teaching History After Identity‐Based Conflicts: The Rwanda Experience.” Comparative Education Review 52 (4): 663–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/591302.
  • Goldberg, T. 2017. “Between Trauma and Perpetration: Psychoanalytical and Social Psychological Perspectives on Difficult Histories in the Israeli Context.” Theory and Research in Social Education 45 (3): 349–377.
  • Goldberg, T., and G. M. Savenije. 2018. “Teaching Controversial Historical Issues.” In International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning, edited by S. Metzger and L. Harris, 503–526. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Goldberg, T., B. B. Schwarz, and D. Porat. 2008. “Living and Dormant Collective Memories as Contexts of History Learning.” Learning and Instruction 18: 223–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.005.
  • Goldberg, T., W. Wagner, and N. Petroviç. 2019. “From Sensitive Historical Issues to History Teachers’ Sensibility. A Look across and within Countries”. Pedagogy, Culture and Society (This issue).
  • Goren, H., and M. Yemini. 2017. “Obstacles and Opportunities for Global Citizenship Education under Intractable Conflict: The Case of Israel.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 48 (3): 397–413
  • Gundare, I. 2002. “Overcoming the Legacy of History for Ethnic Integration in Latvia.” Intermarium 5 (3): 1–29.
  • Hanna, H. 2017. “Dealing with Difference in the Divided Educational Context: Balancing Freedom of Expression and Non-Discrimination in Northern Ireland and Israel.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 47 (1): 17–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2015.1119649.
  • Ho, L.-C. 2010. ““Don’t Worry, I’m Not Going to Report You”: Education for Citizenship in Singapore.” Theory and Research in Social Education 38 (2): 217–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473423.
  • Kello, K. 2016. “Sensitive and Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Teaching History in a Divided Society.” Teachers and Teaching 22 (1): 35–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027.
  • King, J. T. 2009. “Teaching and Learning about Controversial Issues: Lessons from Northern Ireland.” Theory and Research in Social Education 37 (2): 215–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2009.10473395.
  • Klein, S. R. E. 2017. “Preparing to Teach a Slavery Past: History Teachers and Educators as Navigators of Historical Distance.” Theory and Research in Social Education 45 (1): 1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1213677.
  • Leone, G., and M. Sarrica. 2014. “Making Room for Negative Emotions about the National Past: An Explorative Study of Effects of Parrhesia on Italian Colonial Crimes.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 43: 126–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.08.008.
  • Liu, J. H., and D. J. Hilton. 2005. “How the past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics.” British Journal of Social Psychology 44 (4): 537–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X27162.
  • Macdonald, A. 2013. “Considerations of Identity in Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Controversial Issues Under Conditions of Globalization: A Critical Democratic Perspective from Canada.” Doctoral, University of Toronto.
  • McCully, A. 2006. “Practitioner Perceptions of Their Role in Facilitating the Handling of Controversial Issues in Contested Societies: A Northern Irish Experience.” Educational Review 58 (1): 51–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500352671.
  • Mhlauli, M. B. 2012. “The Paradox of Teaching Citizenship Education in Botswana Primary Schools.” European Journal of Educational Research 1 (2): 85–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.
  • Misco, T. 2011. “Teaching about Controversial Issues: Rationale, Practice, and Need for Inquiry.” International Journal for Education Law and Policy 7 (1–2): 13–24.
  • Misco, T. 2012. “The Importance of Context for Teaching Controversial Issues in International Settings.” International Education 42 (1): 69–84.
  • Nieuwenhuyse van, K., and J. Pires Valentim, eds. 2018. The Colonial past in History Textbooks - Historical and Social Psychological Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
  • Nystrand, M., L. L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser, and D. A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35 (2): 135–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3.
  • Oostindie, G. 2009. “Public Memories of the Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery in Contemporary Europe.” European Review 17 (3–4): 611–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798709000970.
  • Psaltis, C., M. Carretero, and S. Čehajić-Clancy, eds. 2017. History Education and Conflict Transformation. Social Psychological Theories, History Teaching and Reconciliation. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Savenije, G. M. 2016. “An Intriguing Historical Trace or Heritage? Learning about Another Person’s Heritage in an Exhibition Addressing WWII.” In Sensitive Pasts. Questioning Heritage in Education, edited by C. van Boxtel, M. Grever, and S. Klein. 218–239. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
  • Savenije, G. M., C. van Boxtel, and M. Grever. 2014. “Sensitive ‘Heritage’ of Slavery in a Multicultural Classroom: Pupils’ Ideas regarding Significance.” British Journal of Educational Studies 62 (2): 127–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2014.910292.
  • Saye, J., and Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative (SSIRC). 2013. “Authentic Pedagogy: Its Presence in Social Studies Classrooms and Relationship to Student Performance on State-Mandated Tests.” Theory & Research in Social Education 41 (1): 89–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2013.756785.
  • Seixas, P., and P. Clark. 2004. “Murals as Monuments: Students’ Ideas about Depictions of Civilization in British Columbia.” American Journal of Education 110 (2): 146–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/380573.
  • Sheppard, M. G. 2010. “Difficult Histories in an Urban Classroom.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  • van Stipriaan, A. 2007. “Disrupting the Canon: The Case of Slavery.” In Beyond the Canon, edited by M. Grever and S. Stuurman, 205–219. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Wagner, W., K. Kello, and A. Rämmer. 2018. “Making Social Objects: The Theory of Social Representation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology, edited by A. Rosa and J. Valsiner, 130–147. 2nd ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wagner, W., K. Kello, and I. Sakki. 2018. “Politics, Identity and Perspectives in History Textbooks.” In Representations of Colonial Pasts in (Post)Colonial Presents–Historical and Social Psychological Perspectives through Textbook Analysis, edited by K. van Nieuwenhuyse and J. Pires Valentim. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
  • Wansink, B., S. Akkerman, and T. Wubbels. 2017. “Topic Variability and Criteria in Interpretational History Teaching.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 49 (5): 640–662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1238107.
  • Waters, S., and W. B. Russell. 2013. “Monumental Controversies: Exploring the Contested History of the United States Landscape.” The Social Studies 104 (2): 77–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.687409.
  • Zembylas, M., and F. Kambani. 2012. “The Teaching of Controversial Issues during Elementary-Level History Instruction: Greek-Cypriot Teachers’ Perceptions and Emotions.” Theory and Research in Social Education 40 (2): 107–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.670591.