Engaging boys in gender transformative pedagogy: navigating discomfort, vulnerability and empathy

References

• Agenda (noyear) “Agenda: Supporting Children and Young People in Making Positive Relations that Matter.” Simon & Schuster. 18 January 2021. http://agendaonline.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht-Crane, C. 2005. “Pedagogy as Friendship: Identity and Affect in the Conservative Classroom.” Cultural Studies 19 (4): 491–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsler, S. 2011. “From ‘Therapeutic’ to Political Education: The Centrality of Affective Sensibility in Critical Pedagogy.” Critical Studies in Education 52 (1): 47–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2011.536512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwaruddin, S. 2016. “Why Critical Literacy Should Turn to ‘The Affective Turn’: Making a Case for Critical Affective Literacy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (3): 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L. 2020. Men Who Hate Women. UK, Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 1997. “The Risks of Empathy: Interrogating multiculturalism’s Gaze.” Cultural Studies 11 (2): 253–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389700490141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 1999. Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2010. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• de Boise, S., and J. Hearn. 2017. “Are Men Getting More Emotional? Critical Sociological Perspectives on Men, Masculinities and Emotions.” The Sociological Review 65 (4): 779–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116686500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Employment Education and Training. 1995. No Fear: A Whole School Approach, Facilitators Guide. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. 1992. “Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy.” In Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy, edited by C. Luke and J. Gore, 90–119. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Enns, C., and L. Forrest. 2005. “Toward Defining and Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Pedagogies.” In Teaching and Social Justice: Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Theories in the Classroom, edited by C. Enns and A. Sinacore, 3–23. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Enns, C., and A. Sinacore, Eds. 2005. Teaching and Social Justice: Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Theories in the Classroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. 2019. Engaging Men and Boys in Violence Prevention. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. M. B. Ramos (Trans.). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, E. 2014. The Ethics of Vulnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 2003. “Public Pedagogy and the Politics of Resistance: Notes on a Critical Theory of Educational Struggle.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1): 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00002.
   Google Scholar
• HealthWest, 2021. “Working Together with Men Project, accessed: January 19 2021.” https://healthwest.org.au/projects/working-together-with-men/projectmomentum/
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. 2012. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112442643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. 2013. “Affect as Method: Feelings, Aesthetics and Affective Pedagogy.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 79–95. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, B. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, M., and M. Kimmel. 2015. The Guy’s Guide to Feminism. USA: Seal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., L. Loksee, D. Ollis, A. Joyce, and C. Gleeson. 2016. Respectful Relationships Education in Schools: The Beginnings of Change. Research Report, Melbourne: Our Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2009. “‘Some of Those Girls Can Be Real Drama Queens’: Issues of Gender, Sexual Harassment and Schooling.” Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning 9 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810802639863.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2020. “Engaging Boys and Young Men in Gender Transformation: The Possibilities and Limits of a Pedagogy of Empathy.” NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies 15 (2): 97–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2019.1706883.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2021. “Engaging Boys in Gender Activism: Issues of Discomfort and Emotion.” Gender and Education 33 (2): 171–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1716956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., and D. Bartel. 2020. “The Affective Intensities of Gender Transformative Work: An Actionable Framework for Facilitators Working with Boys and Young Men.” Journal of Men and Masculinities 1097184X2093005. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X20930058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., and M. Mills. 2007. Teaching Boys: Developing Classroom Practices that Work. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. 2013. Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York, NY: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. 2005. Critical Pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Kukar, P. 2016. “‘The Very Unrecognizability of the Other’. Edith Stein, Judith Butler, and the Pedagogical Challenge of Empathy.” Philosophical Inquiry in Education 24 (1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1070551ar.
   Google Scholar
• McCusker, G. 2017. “A Feminist Teacher’s Account of Her Attempts to Achieve the Goals of Feminist Pedagogy.” Gender and Education 29 (4): 445–460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1290220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. 2003. Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M., M. Greenberg, and T. Peretz. 2015. Some Men: Feminist Allies in the Movement to End Violence against Women. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• News, B. B. C. 2018. “Bill Cosby Sexual Assault Case: Seven Questions Answered.”  accessed: January 19 2021https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada–36371741
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2005. The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ollis, D. 2017. “The Power of Feminist Pedagogy in Australia: Vagina Shorts and the Primary Prevention of Violence against Women.” Gender and Education 29 (4): 461–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1321737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, B. 2012. “Interrogating Privileged Subjectivities: Reflections on Writing Personal Accounts of Privilege.” In Emergent Writing Methodologies in Feminist Studies, edited by M. Livholts, 71–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2020). “Fostering Non-Anthropocentric Vulnerability in Men: Challenging the Autonomous Masculine Subject in Social Work.” In Post-Anthropocentric Social Work: Critical Posthuman and New Materialist Perspectives, edited by V. Bozalek and B. Pease. (pp. 108-120) London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E. 2019. “Ruler-Skirt Risings: Being Crafty with How Gender and Sexuality Education Research-Activisms Can Come to Matter.” In Uplifting Gender and Sexuality Education Research, edited by T. Jones, L. Coll, L. van Leent, and Y. Taylor. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2014. “’F**k Rape!’: Exploring Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., J. Osgood, E. Renold, and K. Strom. 2020. “PhEmaterialism: Response-able Research & Pedagogy.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology. doi:https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3649.
   Google Scholar
• Tassios, C. 2020. “Messages of Malice: Clementine Ford Makes the Case for Exposing Online Trolls.” https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/wellbeing/2020/12/20/clementine-ford-trolls/15 January, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Way, N. 2013. Deep Secrets: Boys’ Friendships and Crisis of Connection. New York: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. H. 2005. “Affecting the Transformative Intellectual: Questioning “Noble” Sentiments in Critical Pedagogy and Composition.” JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture & Politics 25 (4): 717–759.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2013a. “Critical Pedagogy and Emotion: Working through ‘Troubled Knowledge’ in Posttraumatic Contexts.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 176–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2012.743468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2013b. “The “Crisis of Pity” and the Radicalization of Solidarity: Toward Critical Pedagogies of Compassion.” Educational Studies 49 (6): 504–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2013.844148.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2014. “Theorizing ‘Difficult Knowledge’ in the Aftermath of the ‘Affective Turn’: Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Handling Traumatic Representations.” Curriculum Inquiry 44 (3): 390–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2015. “‘Pedagogy of Discomfort’ and Its Ethical Implications: The Tensions of Ethical Violence in Social Justice Education.” Ethics and Education 10 (2): 163–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2015.1039274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., and C. McGlynn. 2012. “Discomforting Pedagogies: Emotional Tensions, Ethical Dilemmas and Transformative Possibilities.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 41–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.523779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar