Knowledge-based resistance: the role of professional organisations in the struggle against statutory assessments in England

References

• Anderson, G., and M. Cohen. 2015. “Redesigning the identities of teachers and leaders: A framework for studying new professionalism and educator resistance.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 23: 85.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., and C. Junemann. 2012. Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol, Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., C. Junemann, and D. Santori. 2017. Edu. Net: Globalisation and Education Policy Mobility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bamsey, V., J. Georgeson, A. Healy, and B. Ó Caoimh. 2020. Mapping the Landscape: Practitioners Views on the Early Years Foundation Stage. Watford, U.K: The British Association for Early Childhood Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. 2004. “Leading as Emotional Management Work in High Risk Times: The Counterintuitive Impulses of Performativity and Passion.” School Leadership & Management 24 (4): 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430410001316534.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. 1998. “Organizing Babylon: On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks.” Public Administration 76 (2): 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A., and G. Roberts-Holmes. 2017. The Datafication of Primary and Early Years Education: Playing with Numbers. Abingdon, London, U.K: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. 1978. “Applied Network Analysis: An Overview.” Sociological Methods & Research 7 (2): 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912417800700201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos Martinez, J., A. Falabella, J. Holloway, and D. Santori. 2022. “Anti-Standardization and Testing Opt-Out Movements in Education: Resistance, Disputes and Transformation.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30:132. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.7506.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., D. Hursh, and B. Lingard. 2021. “The Opt-Out Movement in New York: A Grassroots Movement to Eliminate High-Stakes Testing and Promote Whole Child Public Schooling.” Teachers College Record 123 (5): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I. R., and K. Ward. 2012. “Conferences, Information Infrastructures and Mobile Policies: The Process of Getting Sweden “BID Ready”.” European Urban and Regional Studies 19 (2): 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411420029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G. 2004. “Social networks and social exclusion: an overview of the debate.” In Social Networks and Social Exclusion: Sociological and Policy Issues, edited by P. In, A. Chris, G., and D. Morgan, 7–19. Aldershot: UK. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• (Department for Education). 2020. Development Matters: Non-statutory curriculum guidance for the early years foundation stage. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/development-matters--2
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2017. “Primary Assessment in England.” Government Consultation. https://consult.education.gov.uk/assessment-policy-and-development/primary-assessment/supporting_documents/Primary%20assessment%20in%20England.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, K., and B. Thom. 2014. “The Role of Evidence and the Expert in Contemporary Processes of Governance: The Case of Opioid Substitution Treatment Policy in England.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (5): 964–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., G. Moss, P. Sammons, G. Sinnott, and G. Stobart. 2018. A Baseline without Basis: The Validity and Utility of the Proposed Reception Baseline Assessment in England. London: British Educational Research Association. https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/a-baseline-without-basis.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:360–380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, A. 2015. “Boundary Spanners, Network Capital and the Rise of Edu-Businesses: The Case of News Corporation and Its Emerging Education Agenda.” Critical Studies in Education 56 (3): 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.966126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and D. Santori. 2022. “Legitimising Capital: Parent Organisations and Their Resistance to Testing in England.” Paper presented at Reformed Project conference. Barcelona, June 15-17
   Google Scholar
• Hursh, D., J. Deutermann, L. Rudley, Z. Chen, and S. McGinnis. 2020. Opting Out: The Story of the Parents’ Grassroots Movement to Achieve Whole-Child Public Schools. Stylus Publishing, LLC: Myers Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M. 2015. Exam Factories? The Impact of Accountability Measures on Children and Young People. London: National Union of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D., and J. Preissle. 1993. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., W. Martino, and G. Rezai-Rashti. 2013. “Testing Regimes, Accountabilities and Education Policy: Commensurate Global and National Developments.” Journal of Education Policy 28 (5): 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.820042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, M., and P. O. Öberg. 2014. “Expert Knowledge Use and Deliberation in Local Policy Making.” Policy Sciences 47 (1): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9182-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, L., C. Cabalin, and L. Brossi. 2018. “Alto Al SIMCE: The Campaign Against Standardized Testing in Chile.” Postcolonial Directions in Education 7 (2): 174–175.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, G. 2022. “Researching the prospects for change that COVID disruption has brought to high stakes testing and accountability systems.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30: 139.
   Google Scholar
• MTAS, n.d., More Than a Score: a grassroot’s toolkit for organising. Available at: https://www.morethanascore.org.uk/get-involved/
   Google Scholar
• Niesen, P. 2019. “Introduction: Resistance, Disobedience or Constituent Power? Emerging Narratives of Transnational Protest.” Journal of International Political Theory 15 (1): 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218808065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcerisa, L., A. Termes, A. Termes, and J. Collet-Sabé. 2022. “Why Do Opt-Out Movements Succeed (Or Fail) in Low-Stakes Accountability Systems? A Case Study of the Network of Dissident Schools in Catalonia.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (133). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6330.
   Google Scholar
• Pascal, C., T. Bertram, and L. Rouse. 2019. Getting It Right in the Early Years Foundation Stage: A Review of the Evidence. Watford: The British Association for Early Childhood Education.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., S. Ball, M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2011. “Life in the Pressure Cooker –School League Tables and English and Mathematics teachers’ Responses to Accountability in a Results-Driven Era.” British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (2): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.578568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, B. L. 1996. “Foucault and the Politics of Resistance.” Polity 28 (4): 445–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizmony-Levy, O., B. Lingard, and D. Hursh. 2021. The Opt-Out Movement and the Reform Agenda in U.S. Schools. Teachers College Record. 123 (5), https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=23658Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizmony-Levy, O., and N. G. Saraisky. 2016. Who Opts Out and Why? Results from a National Survey on Opting Out of Standardized Tests. 1–64. New York, NY: Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K074GW.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reckhow, S., and J. W. Snyder. 2014. “The Expanding Role of Philanthropy in Education Politics.” Educational Researcher 43 (4): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14536607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts-Holmes, G. 2015. “The “Datafication” of Early Years Pedagogy: “If the Teaching is Good, the Data Should Be Good and if There’s Bad Teaching, There is Bad Data.” Journal of Education Policy 30 (3): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.924561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. M. L., K. W. C. de Almeida, and M. U. Simões. 2022. “Disputes Around Assessments in Early Childhood Education in Brazil.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (134). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6456.
   Google Scholar
• Sabag, N., and Y. Feniger. 2022. “Parents’ Resistance to Standardized Testing in a Highly Centralized System: The Emergence of an Opt-Out Movement in Israel.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (135). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6328.
   Google Scholar
• Saraisky, N. G., and O. Pizmony-Levy. 2020. “From Policy Networks to Policy Preferences: Organizational Networks in the Opt-Out Movement.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 28:124–124. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4835.
   Google Scholar
• Sisto, V., L. Núñez-Parra, A. López-Barraza, and L. R. C. Del Valle. 2022. “La rebelión de las bases frente a la estandarización del trabajo pedagógico. El caso de la movilización contra la Ley de Carrera Docente en Chile.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (138). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6460.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G., and M. K. Camphuijsen. 2022. “The Battle for Whole-Child Approaches: Examining the Motivations, Strategies and Successes of a Parents’ Resistance Movement Against a Performance Regime in a Local Norwegian School System.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 30 (136). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6452.
   Google Scholar
• Standards and Testing Agency. 2019. Assessment Framework, Reception Baseline Assessment. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmentdata/file/868099/2020AssessmentFrameworkReceptionBaselineAssessment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stromquist, N., and A. Sanyal. 2013. “Student Resistance to Neoliberalism in Chile.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 23 (2): 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2013.790662.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, B. J., and K. Abaidoo-Asiedu. 2016. “Issue Networks: The Policy Process and Its Key Actors.” In Global Encyclopaedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by A. Farazmand, 3418–3423 . Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2445.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., and M. Curran. 2014. “New Public Management as Global Education Policy: Its Adoption and Rec-Contextualisation in a Southern European Setting.” Critical Studies in Education Policy 55 (3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2014.913531.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, and L. Parcerisa. 2019. “Reforming Governance Through Policy Instruments: How and to What Extent Standards, Tests and Accountability in Education Spread Worldwide.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 40 (2): 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 2021. “Examining the Actor Coalitions and Discourse Coalitions of the Opt-Out Movement in New York: A Discourse Network Analysis.” Teachers College Record 123 (5): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar