Curious care: tacit knowledge and self-trust in doctoral training

References

• Barcan, R. 2015. “Learning to Be an Academic: Tacit and Explicit Pedagogies.” In Cultural Pedagogies and Human Conduct, edited by G. Noble, M. Watkins, and C. Driscoll, 129–143. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1145–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, C. 2015. “Introduction: Putting Things in Motion.” In Video Methods: Social Science Research in Motion, edited by C. Bates, 1–9. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, L. 2001. “The Benefits of a Formal Mentoring Relationship: ‘Not My New Best Friend.” In Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)elations, edited by A. Bartlett and G. Mercer, 211–213. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brabazon, T. 2016. Winter is Coming: Doctoral Supervision in the Neoliberal University. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 3(1), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Cargill, M. 2000. “Intercultural Postgraduate Supervision Meetings: An Exploratory Discourse Study.” Prospect 15 (2): 28–38. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.102463
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and N. Winstone. 2023. “Teacher Feedback Literacy and Its Interplay with Student Feedback Literacy.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. P. 2019. “Performing Expertise in Doctoral Dissertations: Thoughts on a Fundamental Dilemma Facing Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors.” Journal of Second Language Writing 43:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., and C. Manathunga. 2012. “On Doctoral Education: How to Supervise a PhD 1985-2011.” Australian Universities’ Review 54 (1): 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. [1990] 2014. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crigger, N. 1997. “The Trouble with Caring: A Review of Eight Arguments Against an Ethic of Care.” Journal of Professional Nursing 13 (4): 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(97)80091-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B., and J. Pryor. 2008. “Becoming Researchers: A Sociocultural Perspective on Assessment, Learning and the Construction of Identity in a Professional Doctorate.” Pedagogy Culture & Society 16 (3): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360802346614.
   Google Scholar
• Dadvand, B., and H. Cuervo. 2020. “Pedagogies of Care in Performative Schools.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 41 (1): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1486806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R., M. T. Mainhard, P. Meijer, A. Pilot, and M. Brekelmans. 2012. “Master’s Thesis Supervision: Relations Between Perceptions of the Supervisor-Student Relationship, Final Grade, Perceived Supervisor Contribution to Learning and Student Satisfaction.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (8): 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.556717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, C., N. R. Colet, and C. Lison. 2019. “Doctoral Supervision in North America: Perception and Challenges of Supervisor and Supervisee.” Higher Education Studies 9 (1): 30–39. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p30.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Z. M., and P. J. Anderson. 2019. “Indigenous Doctoral Literacy in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” In Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians, edited by J. Rennie and H. Harper, 127–145. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_8.
   Google Scholar
• Eley, A., and R. Murray. 2009. How to Be an Effective Supervisor: Best Practice in Research Student Supervision. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. 2000. “Non-Formal Learning and Tacit Knowledge in Professional Work.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 70 (1): 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frow, J. 1988. “Discipline and Discipleship.” Textual Practice 2 (3): 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502368808582038.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 2003. “Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 24 (2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300303042.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. M. 2010. “Improvising Together: The Play of Dialogue in Humanities Supervision.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (3): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210379376.
   Google Scholar
• Grealy, L. 2016. “Cliché, Gossip, and Anecdote as Supervision Training.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, & Cultural Studies 38 (4): 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2016.1203682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., and R. Usher. 2003. “Fast Supervision: Changing Supervisory Practices in Changing Times.” Studies in Continuing Education 25 (1): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370309281.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and P. Bansel. 2012. “The Learning Alliance: Ethics in Doctoral Supervision.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (4): 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.706219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hytten, K. 2004. “Postcritical Ethnography: Research as a Pedagogical Encounter.” In Postcritical Ethnography: Reinscribing Critique, edited by G. W. Noblit, S. Y. Flores, and E. G. Murillo Jr., 95–105. New York: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2012. “The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust.” Social Epistemology 26 (2): 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2001. “Postmodernism, Post-Structuralism and Post(critical) Ethnography: Of Ruins, Aporias and Angels.” In Handbook of Ethnography, edited by P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland, 477–492. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337.n33.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. 2020. “The Dude Abides, or Why Curiosity is Important for Education Today.” In Curiosity Studies: A New Ecology of Knowledge, edited by P. Zurn and A. Shankar, 91–105. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., and C. Seale. 2007. “Managing Criticism in Ph.D. Supervision: A Qualitative Case Study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon, J. 2004. “Academic Supervision: Seeking Metaphors and Models for Quality.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 28 (4): 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000298876.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. 2005. “The Development of Research Supervision: “Turning the Light on a Private Space”.” International Journal for Academic Development 10 (1): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440500099977.
   Google Scholar
• Markey, A., and G. Loewenstein. 2014. “Curiosity.” In International Handbook of Emotions in Education, edited by R. Pekrun and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, 228–245. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M., and V. Turkulainen. 2011. “Personal Commitment, Support and Progress in Doctoral Studies.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., M. Castello, and K. Pyhaltö. 2020. “What Influences PhD Graduate Trajectories During the Degree: A Research-Based Policy Agenda.” Higher Education 80 (6): 1011–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00448-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. C., and B. Mills. 2019. “‘If They Don’t Care, I Don’t Care’: Millennial and Generation Z Students and the Impact of Faculty Caring.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 19 (4): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i4.24167.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noddings, N. 2012. “The Caring Relation in Teaching.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (6): 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., M. Arnold, C. Phillips, and K. Dwan. 2010. “Methodological Considerations of Digital Video Observation: Beyond Conversation Analysis.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4 (2): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.090.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. 2014. “Space for Curiosity.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (4): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513506271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2013. Doing Visual Ethnography. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1962a. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1962b. “Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy.” Reviews of Modern Physics 34 (4): 601. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.34.601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., J. Vekkaila, and J. Keskinen. 2015. “Fit Matters in the Supervisory Relationship: Doctoral Students and Supervisors Perceptions About the Supervisory Activities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raingruber, B. 2003. “Video-Cued Narrative Reflection: A Research Approach for Articulating Tacit, Relational, and Embodied Understandings.” Qualitative Health Research 13 (8): 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawolle, S., J. Rowlands, and J. Blackmore. 2017. “The Implications of Contractualism for the Responsibilisation of Higher Education.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (1): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H. 2010. “The Importance of Tacit Knowledge in Practices of Care.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01235.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, K. A. R., and T. Fletcher. 2019. “Navigating the Personal Challenges and Sociopolitics of Doctoral Supervision.” Studying Teacher Education 15 (3): 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2019.1634537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., and J. Trent. 2022. “Promoting Agentive Feedback Engagement Through Dialogically Minded Approaches in Doctoral Writing Supervision.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59 (4): 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1861965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and C. Robinson. 2009. “Student Voice: Theorising Power and Participation.” Pedagogy Culture & Society 17 (2): 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360902934392.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, K. L., N. Turner, H. M. Williams, and S. Piccin‐Houle. 2010. “Giving Thanks: The Relational Context of Gratitude in Postgraduate Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (8): 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903348396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker-Gleaves, C. 2019. “Is Caring Pedagogy Really so Progressive? Exploring the Conceptual and Practical Impediments to Operationalizing Care in Higher Education.” In Higher Education and Hope: Institutional, Pedagogical and Personal Possibilities, edited by. P. Gibbs and A. Peterson, 93–112. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13566-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., G. Robinson, V. Trafford, E. Creighton, and M. Warnes. 2003. “Recognising and Overcoming Dissonance in Postgraduate Student Research.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (1): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2007. “Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism.” In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, edited by B. Van Den Brink and D. Owen, 189–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498732.008.
   Google Scholar