Publication Cover
Sex Education
Sexuality, Society and Learning
Volume 22, 2022 - Issue 5
4,291
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Diversity in sex and relationship education – limitations and possibilities in Swedish biology textbooks

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 521-537 | Received 21 Dec 2020, Accepted 27 Jul 2021, Published online: 21 Sep 2021

References

  • Ah-King, M. 2013. “Queering Animal Sexual Behavior in Biology Textbooks.” Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics 1 (2): 46–89. doi:10.3384/confero.2001-4562.13v1i21d.
  • Bahner, J. 2018. “Cripping Sex Education: Lessons Learned from a Programme Aimed at Young People with Mobility Impairments.” Sex Education 18 (6): 640–654.
  • Bazzul, J., and H. Sykes. 2011. “The Secret Identity of a Biology Textbook: Straight and Naturally Sexed.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 6 (2): 265–286. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9297-z.
  • Bengtsson, J., and E. Bolander. 2020. “Strategies for Inclusion and Equality–‘Norm-critical’ Sex Education in Sweden.” Sex Education 20 (2): 154–169. doi:10.1080/14681811.2019.1634042.
  • Bolander, E., and A. Fejes. 2015. Diskursanalys. Handbok I Kvalitativ Analys, 2nd ed., edited by A. Fejes and R. Thornberg, 90–114. Handbook in qualitative analyses. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  • Brömdal, A., M. L. Rasmussen, F. Sanjakdar, L. Allen, and K. Quinlivan. 2017. “Intersex Bodies in Sexuality Education: On the Edge of Cultural Difference.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Sexuality Education, edited by L. Allen and M. L. Rasmussen, 369–390. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Butler, J. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
  • Christianson, M., and C. Eriksson. 2014. “Promoting Women’s Human Rights: A Qualitative Analysis of Midwives’ Perceptions about Virginity Control and Hymen ‘Reconstruction’.” European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 20 (3): 181–192. doi:10.3109/13625187.2014.977435.
  • de Lauretis, T. 2000. “Gender, Body, and Habit Change.” Peirce, Semiotics, and Psychoanalysis, Psychiatry and the Humanities 15: 159–175.
  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Gegenfurtner, A., and M. Gebhardt. 2017. “Sexuality Education Including Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Issues in Schools.” Educational Research Review 22: 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.002.
  • Gerouki, M. 2008. “Pushed to the Margins–sex and Relationships in Greek Primary Textbooks.” Sex Education 8 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1080/14681810802218429.
  • Honkasalo, V. 2018. “Culture and Sexuality in Finnish Health Education Textbooks.” Sex Education 18 (5): 541–554. doi:10.1080/14681811.2018.1437030.
  • Kim, E. 2011. “Asexuality in Disability Narratives.” Sexualities 14 (4): 479–493. doi:10.1177/1363460711406463.
  • Kjaran, J. I. 2017. Constructing Sexualities and Gendered Bodies in School Spaces: Nordic Insights on Queer and Transgender Students. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kumashiro, K. K. 2000. “Toward a Theory of Anti-Oppressive Education.” Review of Educational Research 70 (1): 25–53. doi:10.3102/00346543070001025.
  • Loeser, C., B. Pini, and V. Crowley. 2018. “Disability and Sexuality: Desires and Pleasures.” Sexualities 21 (3): 255–270. doi:10.1177/1363460716688682.
  • Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. 2012. “‘I Want to Do It Right!’ A Pilot Study of Swedish Sex Education and Young People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 30 (2): 209–225. doi:10.1007/s11195-011-9239-z.
  • Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. 2013. “‘Hip to Be Crip?’ about Crip Theory, Sexuality and People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 31 (4): 413–424. doi:10.1007/s11195-013-9287-7.
  • Macgillivray, I. K., and T. Jennings. 2008. “A Content Analysis Exploring Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Topics in Foundations of Education Textbooks.” Teacher Education 59 (2): 170–188. doi:10.1177/0022487107313160.
  • Martin, E. 1991. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male–Female Roles.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16 (3): 485–501. doi:10.1086/494680.
  • McRuer, R. 2010. “Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence.” The Disability Studies Reader 3: 383–392.
  • Milles, K., J. Holmdahl, I. Melander, and K. Fugl-Meyer. 2018. “‘Something that Stretches during Sex’: Replacing the Word Hymen with Vaginal Corona to Challenge Patriarchal Views on Virginity.” Gender & Language 12: 3.
  • Myerson, M., S. L. Crawley, E. H. Anstey, J. Kessler, and C. Okopny. 2007. “Who’s Zoomin’ Who? A Feminist, Queer Content Analysis of ‘Interdisciplinary’ Human Sexuality Textbooks.” Hypatia 22 (1): 92–113.
  • Pasley, A. 2020. “The Effects of Agential Realism on Sex Research, Intersexuality and Education.” In Sex Education, 1–15.
  • Rolls, G. 2019. Classic Case Studies in Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Røthing, Å. 2017. “Sexual Orientation in Norwegian Science Textbooks: Heteronormativity and Selective Inclusion in Textbooks and Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 143–151. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.005.
  • Røthing, Å., and S. H. B. Svendsen. 2011. “Sexuality in Norwegian Textbooks: Constructing and Controlling Ethnic Borders?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (11): 1953–1973. doi:10.1080/01419870.2011.560275.
  • Russell, S. T. 2019. “Numbers and Stories: Bridging Methods to Advance Social Change.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sexual Development: Childhood and Adolescence, edited by S. Lamb and J. Gilbert, 336–351. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sandahl, C. 2003. “Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer? Intersections of Queer and Crip Identities in Solo Autobiographical Performance.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9 (1–2): 25–56. doi:10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25.
  • Shaver, A. N., M. Bello, and E. F. Provenzo Jr. 2010. The Textbook as Discourse: Sociocultural Dimensions of American Schoolbooks. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shlasko, G. 2005. “Queer (V.) Pedagogy.” Equity & Excellence in Education 38 (2): 123–134. doi:10.1080/10665680590935098.
  • Simovska, V., R. Kane, P. Venka Simovska, and D. Ros Kane. 2015. “Sexuality Education in Different Contexts: Limitations and Possibilities.” Health Education 5 (1): 2–6. doi:10.1108/HE-10-2014-0093.
  • Skolinspektionen [The Swedish Schools Inspectorate]. 2018. Sex- Och Samlevnadsundervisning. Tematisk Kvalitetsgranskning [Sex and Relationship Education. Thematic Quality Audit]. Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
  • Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. 2013. Sex- Och Samlevnadsundervisning I Grundskolans Senare År: Jämställdhet, Sexualitet Och Relationer I Ämnesundervisningen: Årskurserna 7–9 [Sex and Relationship Education in the Later Years of Compulsory School: Gender Equality, Sexuality and Relationships in the Subject Education: Grades 7–9]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. 2018. Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and School-age Educare 2011: Revised 2018. Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Skolverket [The Swedish National Agency for Education]. 2019. Läroplan För Grundskolan, Förskoleklassen Och Fritidshemmet 2011: Reviderad 2019. [Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket. revised 2019.
  • Snyder, V. L., and F. S. Broadway. 2004. “Queering High School Biology Textbooks.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (6): 617–636. doi:10.1002/tea.20014.
  • Stelzl, M., B. Stairs, and H. Anstey. 2018. “A Narrow View: The Conceptualization of Sexual Problems in Human Sexuality Textbooks.” Journal of Health Psychology 23 (2): 148–160. doi:10.1177/1359105317742920.
  • Sullivan, N. 2003. A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York: New York University Press.
  • Sundaram, V., and H. Sauntson. 2016. Global Perspectives and Key Debates in Sex and Relationships Education: Addressing Issues of Gender, Sexuality, Plurality and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.
  • Svendsen, S. H. B. 2012. “Elusive Sex Acts: Pleasure and Politics in Norwegian Sex Education.” Sex Education 12 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1080/14681811.2012.677209.
  • Táboas-Pais, M. I., and A. Rey-Cao. 2012. “Disability in Physical Education Textbooks: An Analysis of Image Content.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 29 (4): 310–328. doi:10.1123/apaq.29.4.310.
  • Terry, G., N. Hayfield, V. Clarke, and V. Braun. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, edited by C. Willig and W. S. Rogers, 17–37. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
  • Weiss, G. 2015. “The Normal, the Natural, and the Normative: A Merleau-Pontian Legacy to Feminist Theory, Critical Race Theory, and Disability Studies.” Continental Philosophy Review 48 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1007/s11007-014-9316-y.
  • Wilmot, M., and D. Naidoo. 2014. “‘Keeping Things Straight’: The Representation of Sexualities in Life Orientation Textbooks.” Sex Education 14 (3): 323–337. doi:10.1080/14681811.2014.896252.