Dyadic sexual communication scale: psychometrics properties and translation of the Persian version

References

• Anderson, A. B., Rosen, N. O., Price, L., & Bergeron, S. (2016). Associations between penetration cognitions, genital pain, and sexual well-being in women with provoked vestibulodynia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(3), 444–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab Alidousti, A., Nakhaee, N., & Khanjani, N. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the ENRICH marital satisfaction (brief version) and Kansas marital satisfaction scales. Journal of Health and Development, 4(2), 158–150. http://jhad.kmu.ac.ir/article-1-101-en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Arman, S., & Hasanzahraei, R. (2010). Diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction. Isfahan: kankash.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (methodology in the social sciences). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butzer, B, & Campbel, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (2011). Beyond the birds and the bees and was it good for you? Thirty years of research on sexual communication. Canadian Psychology, 52(1), 20–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania, J. A. (1998). Dyadic sexual communication. In: C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & L. D. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dastan, N., Rajabi, G. H., Khoshkonesh, A., & Khojasteh Mehr, R. (2010). Developing and validating of couples communication skills inventory in married couples in Tehran. Journal of Psychological Models and Methods, 1(1), 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gheisari, S., & Karimian, N. (2013). A causal model based on relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, marital quality, anxiety of sexual relationship, sexual assertiveness, and the frequency of intercourse in female maried students of Bandarabbas. The Journal of Culture Counseling, 4(16), 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gheshlaghi, F., Dorvashi, G., Aran, F., Shafiei, F., & Najafabadi, G. M. (2014). The study of sexual satisfaction in Iranian women applying for divorce. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 8(3), 281–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins, J. A., Mullinax, M., Trussell, J., Davidson, J. K., Sr., & Moore, N. B. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and sexual health among university students in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 101(9), 1643–1654. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2011.300154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser, J. (2008). Nursing research: Reading, using and creating evidence. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(5), 409–424. doi: 10.1080/00926230591006719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, A. K. (2005). The relationship among marital quality, sexual frequency, sexual disagreement, depression, and married women sexual satisfaction (B.S.). USA: University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Maltby, J., Day, L., McCutcheon, L. E., Gillett, R., Houran, J., & Ashe, D. D. (2004). Personality and coping: A context for examining celebrity worship and mental health. British Journal of Psychology, 95(Pt 4), 411–428. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mark, K. P., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2013). The mediating role of sexual and nonsexual communication between relationship and sexual satisfaction in a sample of college-age heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 39(5), 410–427. doi: 10.1080/0092623x.2011.644652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell. I. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Michaeli Manee, F. (2011). Internal consistency and confirmatory factor analysis of Wells and Davis thought control questionnaire. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 16(4), 468–478. http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-1211-en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, BH. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott: William & Wilkins co.
   Google Scholar
• Pazmany, E., Bergeron, S., Verhaeghe, J., Van Oudenhove, L., & Enzlin, P. (2015). Dyadic sexual communication in pre-menopausal women with self-reported dyspareunia and their partners: Associations with sexual function, sexual distress and dyadic adjustment. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 516–528. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plitcha, S. B., & Elizabeth, A. K. (2013). Munro’s statistical methods for health care research (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Wiliams & Wikins.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, U. S., Rellini, A. H., & Fallis, E. (2011). The importance of sexual self-disclosure to sexual satisfaction and functioning in committed relationships. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(11), 3108–3115. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02439.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiss, J. A. (2011). Modeling dyadic effects in the associations between relational uncertainty, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction for husbands and wives. Communication Research, 38(4), 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., Sassler, S., & Nicholson, L. M. (2008). For better or for worse? The consequences of marriage and cohabitation for single mothers. Social Forces, 86(4), 1481–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, A. U., & Shuraydi, M. (2002). Perceptions of arranged marriages by young Pakistani Muslim women living in a Western society. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/41603839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar