Post-anthropocentric Rehearsal Studies. A conceptual framework to account for the social and material mediations in performance-making

References

• Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. “A Summary of A Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society Studies in Sociotecnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 259–264. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allain, P. 2016. “Thick Description/Thin Lines: Writing about Process in Contemporary Performance.” Contemporary Theatre Review 26 (4): 485–495. doi:10.1080/10486801.2016.1216409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. 2003. “Methodology for Close up Studies – Struggling with Closeness and Closure.” Higher Education 46 (2): 167–193. doi:10.1023/A:1024716513774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoine Hennion, Cecile Meadel and Geoffrey Bowker. 1989. The Artisans of Desire: The Mediation of Advertising between Product and Consumer, Sociological Theory, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 191–209, https://www.jstor.org/stable/201895
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., A. Coffey, and S. Delamont. 1999. “Ethnography: Post, Past, and Present.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 28 (5): 460–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaubois, V. 2015. “Design, Assemblage and Functionality.” In Deleuze and Design,  edited by Betty Marenko and Jamie Brassett, 173–190. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S, 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, A. 2003. Lo studio etnografico delle organizzazioni. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. L. 2001. Playwrights in Rehearsal: The Seduction of Company, Routledge, New York, London
   Google Scholar
• Conkie, R. 2012. “Rehearsal: The Pleasures of the Flesh.” Shakespeare Bulletin 30 (4): 411–429. doi:10.1353/shb.2012.0077.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. “Introducing the New Materialisms.” New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• De La Fuente, E. 2007. “TheNew Sociology of Art’: Putting Art Back into Social Science Approaches to the Arts.” Cultural Sociology 1 (3): 409–425. doi:10.1177/1749975507084601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1980. Mille Plateaux. Paris: Minuit Paris.
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. 2000. Everyday Life. England: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. 2003. After Adorno: Rethinking Music Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1994. “The Fifth Moment.” Handbook of Qualitative Research 1 (1994): 575–586.
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., and M. Lisa. 2006. Music as Social Perfomance. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., and M. Ring. 1998. “Review Essay: Towards a New Sociology of Art Worlds: Bringing Meaning Back In.” Acta Sociologica 41 (2–3): 277–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farías, I., and A. Wilkie. 2016. Studio Studies. Topologies, Operations and Displacements. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lichte, E. 2014. The Routledge Introduction to Theatre and Performance Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. 2016. The Trouble with Women. London, UK: Square Peg.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. 2015. “Creativity, Anti-Humanism and the “New Sociology of Art”.” Journal of Sociology 51 (3): 522–536. doi:10.1177/1440783313498947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea, M., and S. Musca. 2020. Redefining Theatre Communities: International Perspectives on Community-Conscious Theatre-Making. Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harvie, J., and A. Lavender. 2010. Making Contemporary Theatre: International Rehearsal Processes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. 1997. “Baroque and Rock: Music, Mediators and Musical Taste.” Poetics 24 (6): 415–435. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00005-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. 2012. “Music and Mediation. Toward a New Sociology of Music’.” In The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by M. Clayton, T. Herbert, and R. Middleton, 249–260. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. 2015. The Passion for Music: A Sociology of Mediation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A., and Grenier, L., 2000. “16 Sociology of Art: New Stakes in a Post-Critical Time.” In The international handbook of sociology, edited by Stella R. Quah and Arnaud Sales340–355. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Taylor & Francis: Milton Park.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, R. 2004. Reading the Material Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage Libr. Social Res 80. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, H.-T. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lise, J. 2020. “Actor-Network Theory as an Analytical Approach.” In Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences, edited by M. Järvinen and N. Mik-Meyer, 327–244. Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester Harvie, Jen. 2010. ’Introduction: Contemporary theatre in the making’. In Making Contemporary Theatre: International Rehearsal Processes, edited by Harvie J. and Lavender A., 1–16. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. 2012. “What Is a Workshop?” Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 3 (3): 349–361. doi:10.1080/19443927.2012.719832.
   Google Scholar
• Mattozzi, A. 2019. “What Can ANT Still Learn from Semiotics?” In The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, edited by A. Blok, I. Farías, and C. Roberts, 87–100. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattozzi, A., and L. L. Parolin. 2020. “Bodies Translating Bodies: Methodological Reflections on How to Tackle Aesthetic Practices from an ANT Point of View.” Science & Technology Studies. doi:10.23987/sts.79694 .
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, G. 1998. “Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal.” New Theatre Quarterly 14 (53): 75–85. doi:10.1017/S0266464X00011751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, G. 2006 “The emerging field of rehearsal studies.” About performance, (6), 7–13
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, G. 2008. “Not Magic but Work: Rehearsal and the Production of Meaning.” Theatre Research International 33 (3): 276. doi:10.1017/S0307883308003970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, G. 2012. “A Taxonomy of Spatial Function: Gay McAuley.” In Theatre and Performance Design, 113–118. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, G. 2015. “Editing: In the Rehearsal Room.” Contemporary Theatre Review 25 (1): 35–38. doi:10.1080/10486801.2015.992235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melrose, S. 2007. “Still Harping on (About Expert Practitioner-centred Modes of Knowledge and Models of Intelligibility).” In E-science institute workshop: digital representations in the performing arts, 18th July 2007, Edinburgh. Available at: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/9287/, accessed 18/ 11/2020.
   Google Scholar
• Melrose, S. 2009. “Expert-intuitive Processing and the Logics of Production.” In Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader, edited by J. Butterworth and L. Wildschut, 23–37.  London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L. 2010a. “L’innovazione Nelle Relazioni Tra i Nodi Di Un Network. Il Caso Dei Fornitori Artigiani Nell’industria Del Mobile.” In Studi Organizzativi (1): 55–74
   Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L. 2010b. “Sulla Produzione Materiale. Qualità Sensibili e Sapere Pratico Nella Stabilizzazione Degli Artefatti.” Tecnoscienza 1 (1): 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., and A. Mattozzi. 2013. “Sensitive Translations: Sensitive Dimension and Knowledge within Two Craftsmen’s Workplaces.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29 (4): 353–366. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., and A. Mattozzi. 2014. “«Come Meglio Credi». Conoscenza Tacita e Innovazione Nel Distretto Del Legno-Arredo Della Brianza.” Polis 28 (3): 365–392.
   Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., and C. Pellegrinelli. 2020a. “Unpacking Distributed Creativity: Analysing Sociomaterial Practices in Theatre Artwork.” Culture & Psychology 26 (3): 434–453. doi:10.1177/1354067X19894936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., and C. Pellegrinelli. 2020b. “Where Does It Come From? Collaborative Emergence in Creative Work Practices.” New Ideas in Psychology 59: 100800. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parolin, L. L., and Mattozzi, A., “How to account for tacit knowledge in innovation processes: the concept of ‘network within’.” RASK(51) 39–54
   Google Scholar
• Strandvad, S. M. 2009. “Inspirations for a New Sociology of Art.” In A Sociomaterial Study of Development Processes in the Danish Film Industry. Copenhagen: Doctoral School of Organization and Management Studies, CBS/Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Valtonen, A., S. Meriläinen, P.-M. Laine, and S.-L. Tarja. 2017. “The Knowing Body as a Floating Body.” Management Learning 48 (5): 520–534. doi:10.1177/1350507617706833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar