Making Sense of Turkey's Rising Power Status: What Does Turkey's Approach Within NATO Tell Us?

Bibliography

• “Active Engagement, Modern Defense Strategic Concept for the Defense and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Lisbon, November 19–20, 2010. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_68580.htm
   Google Scholar
• Akçali, E., and M. Perinçek. “Kemalist Eurasianism: An Emerging Geopolitical Discourse in Turkey.” Geopolitics 14, no. 3 (2009): 550–569.
   Google Scholar
• Aybet, Gülnur. “The Evolution of NATO's Three Phases and Turkey's Transatlantic Relationship.” Perceptions 17, no. 1 (2012): 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Aykan, Mahmut B. “Turkey and European Security and Defence Identity/Policy (ESDI/P): A Turkish View.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 13, no. 3 (2005): 335–359. doi: 10.1080/14782800500378433
   Google Scholar
• Bacık, Gökhan. “Turkey and the BRICS: Can Turkey Join the BRICS?” Turkish Studies 14, no. 4 (2013): 758–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burges, Sean W. “Brazil as a Bridge Between Old and New Powers?” International Affairs 89, no. 3 (2013): 577–594. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikpala, Mitat. “Escalating Rivalries and Diverging Interests: Prospects for Stability and Security in the Black Sea Region.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10, no. 3 (2010): 287–302. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2010.503640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davutoğlu, Ahmet. “Transformation of NATO and Turkey's Position.” Perceptions 17, no. 1 (2012): 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, Trine. NATO and the (Re)-Constitution of Roles: ‘Self’, ‘We’ and ‘Other’? Working Paper 2010/4. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, Ann. “Rising Asian Powers and Changing Global Governance.” International Studies Review 13, no. 1 (2011): 24–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Richard, and D. M. Kliman. “International Order and Global Swing States.” The Washington Quarterly 36, no. 1 (2013): 93–109. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2013.751653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, George E. “Turkey's Role in Peacekeeping Missions.” American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy 28, no. 6 (2006): 435–449. doi: 10.1080/10803920601072025
   Google Scholar
• Güney, Aylin. “Anti-Americanism in Turkey: Past and Present.” Middle Eastern Studies 44, no. 3 (2008): 471–487. doi: 10.1080/00263200802021632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güvenç, Serhat, and S. Özel. “NATO and Turkey in the Post-Cold War World: Between Abandonment and Entrapment.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 12, no. 4 (2012): 533–553. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2012.741845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallams, Ellen. “The Transatlantic Alliance Renewed: The United States and NATO Since 9/11.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 7, no. 1 (2009): 38–60. doi: 10.1080/14794010802658823
   Google Scholar
• Hart, Andrew F., and B. D. Jones. “How Do Rising Powers Rise?” Survival 52, no. 6 (2010–2011): 63–88. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2010.540783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Arita. “The Changing Role of NATO: Exploring the Implications for Security Governance and Legitimacy.” European Society 20, no. 4 (2011): 529–546.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, Jolyon. “ESDP and NATO Wedlock or Deadlock?” Cooperation and Conflict 38, no. 3 (2003): 235–254. doi: 10.1177/00108367030383003
   Google Scholar
• Ian, Traynor. “Turkey and France Clash Over Libya Air Campaign.” The Guardian, March 24, 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/24/turkey-france-clash-libya-campaign
   Google Scholar
• İsmail, Duman. “What is Turkey's Position on Libya?” World Bulletin, April 12, 2011. http://www.worldbulletin.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=72425
   Google Scholar
• Kardaş, Şaban. Quest for Strategic Autonomy Continues, or How to Make Sense of Turkey's ‘New Wave’. GMF Series on Turkey Analysis. Ankara: German Marshall Fund, 2011: 1–4. http://www.gmfus.org/archives/quest-for-strategic-autonomy-continues-or-how-to-make-sense-of-turkeys-new-wave/
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Sean. “What Went Wrong with NATO?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18, no. 1 (2005): 69–83. doi: 10.1080/09557570500059589
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroğlu, Mustafa. “Turkey's Place in the ‘Missile Shield’.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 15, no. 2 (2013): 223–236. doi: 10.1080/19448953.2013.775761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, Deborah W., and A. Shevchenko. “Status Seekers Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy.” International Security 34, no. 4 (2010): 63–95. doi: 10.1162/isec.2010.34.4.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, Ian O. Turkey, the NATO Summit, and After. GMF Series on Turkey Analysis. German Marshall Fund. 2010: 1–4. http://www.gmfus.org/galleries/ct_publication_attachments/Lesser_NATO_Nov10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moens, Alexander. “Transatlantic Bipolarity and NATO's Global Role.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 4, no. 2 (2006): 241–252. doi: 10.1080/14794010708656849
   Google Scholar
• Mowle, Thomas S., and D. H. Sacko. “Global NATO: Bandwagoning in a Unipolar World.” Contemporary Security Policy 28, no. 3 (2007): 597–618. doi: 10.1080/13523260701738107
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Robert W., and J. McCoy. “From Middle Power to Peacebuilder: The Use of the Canadian Forces in Modern Canadian Foreign Policy.” American Review of Canadian Studies 40, no. 2 (2010): 171–188. doi: 10.1080/02722011003734712
   Google Scholar
• Neack, L. The New Foreign Policy Power Seeking in A Globalized Era, New Millennium Books in International Studies. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, Detlef. “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics.” Review of International Studies 36, no. 4 (2010): 881–901. doi: 10.1017/S026021051000135X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oğuzlu, Tarık. “An Analysis of Turkey's Prospective Membership in the European Union from a ‘Security Perspective’.” Security Dialogue 34, no. 3 (2003): 285–299. doi: 10.1177/09670106030343004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oğuzlu, Tarık. “NATO ve Türkiye: Dönüşen İttifakın Sorgulayan Üyesi.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 9, no. 34 (2012): 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Oğuzlu, Tarık. “Turkey and the West: The Rise of ‘Turkey-Centric Westernizm’.” International Journal 66, no. 4 (2011): 981–998. doi: 10.1177/002070201106600422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oğuzlu, Tarık. “Turkey's Eroding Commitment to NATO: From Identity to Interests.” Washington Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2012): 153–164. doi: 10.1080/0163660X.2012.706578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. “Turkey in the Post-Cold War Era: In Search of Identity.” The Middle East Journal 49, no. 1 (1995): 48–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel, Soli. NATO Summit: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. GMF Series on Turkey Analysis. German Marshall Fund, 2010: 1–4. http://www.gmfus.org/archives/nato-summit-implications-for-turkish-foreign-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V. “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy.” International Security 30, no. 1 (2005): 46–71. doi: 10.1162/0162288054894652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirm, Stefan A. “Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 16, no. 2 (2010): 197–221. doi: 10.1177/1354066109342922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, Zachary. “Balancing Against or Balancing With? The Spectrum of Alignment and the Endurance of American Hegemony.” Security Studies 22, no. 2 (2013): 330–364. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2013.786918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, Helene. “On the Identity of NATO.” International Affairs 80, no. 4 (2004): 687–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, Matthew D. “Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa.” Global Society 26, no. 3 (2012): 289–309. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2012.682277
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, Nathalie. “Let's Talk Turkey! US Influence on EU–Turkey Relations.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25, no. 3 (2012): 399–416. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2011.646243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Turkey Owns, Leads, Serves to ‘New Mideast:’ Davutoğlu.” Accessed July 14, 2013. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-owns-leads-serves-to-new-mideastdavutoglu.aspx?pageID=238&nid=19400
   Google Scholar
• Türkmen, Füsun. “Anti-Americanism as a Default Ideology of Opposition: Turkey as a Case Study.” Turkish Studies 11, no. 3 (2010): 329–345. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2010.506738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakas, Petros. “NATO and Turkey in Afghanistan and Central Asia: Possibilities and Blind Spots.” Turkish Studies 10, no. 1 (2009): 57–74. doi: 10.1080/14683840802648661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Andrew T. “The Structural and Political Crisis of NATO Transformation.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 7, no. 4 (2009): 476–492. doi: 10.1080/14794010903286318
   Google Scholar