Price and prejudice: the politics of carbon market establishment in Turkey

Bibliography

• Adaman, F., B. Akbulut, and M. Arsel. Neoliberal Turkey and Its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment Under Erdoğan. London: IB Tauris, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., and Y. M. Madra. “Understanding Neoliberalism as Economization: The Case of the Environment.” In Global Economic Crisis and the Politics of Diversity, edited by Yıldız Atasoy, 29–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Akçay, Ü. Neoliberal populism in Turkey and its crisis. No. 100/2018. Working Paper, Institute for International Political Economy Berlin, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Andreucci, D., M. García-Lamarca, J. Wedekind, and E. Swyngedouw. “‘Value Grabbing’: A Political Ecology of Rent.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 28, no. 3 (2017): 28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Arı, İ. “Voluntary Emission Trading Potential of Turkey.” Energy Policy 62 (2013): 910–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arı, I., and M. Aydınalp Köksal. “Carbon Dioxide Emission From the Turkish Electricity Sector and its Mitigation Options.” Energy Policy 39, no. 10 (2011): 6120–6135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I. “The EU Emissions Trading Scheme.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1, no. 1 (2010): 144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., and S. Maresh. “Scales and Networks of Neoliberal Climate Governance: the Regulatory and Territorial Logics of European Union Emissions Trading.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34, no. 4 (2009): 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berta, N., E. Gautherat, and Ö. Gün. “Transactions in the European Carbon Market: A Bubble of Compliance in a Whirlpool of Speculation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41, no. 2 (2017): 575–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuret, N. “Counting Carbon: Calculative Activism and Slippery Infrastructure.” Antipode 49, no. 5 (2017): 1164–1185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, A. “Clash of the Eco-sciences: Carbon Marketization, Environmental NGOs and Performativity as Politics.” Economy and Society 40, no. 3 (2011): 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. “Resource Geographies 1: Making Carbon Economies, old and new.” Progress in Human Geography 35, no. 6 (2011): 820–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., B. Özkaynak, and E. Turhan. “Energy Infrastructure and the Fate of the Nation: Introduction to Special Issue.” Energy Research & Social Science 41 (2018): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, G. “The Politics of Carbon Market Design: Rethinking the Techno-Politics and Post-Politics of Climate Change.” Antipode 48, no. 4 (2016): 877–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, G. “Nature as Accumulation Strategy? Finance, Nature, and Value in Carbon Markets.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108, no. 3 (2018): 605–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A. G. “The Matter of Carbon: Understanding the Materiality of tCO2e in Carbon Offsets.” Antipode 43, no. 3 (2011): 612–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumpus, A. G., and D. M. Liverman. “Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets.” Economic Geography 84, no. 2 (2008): 127–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calel, R. “Carbon Markets: a Historical Overview.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4, no. 2 (2013): 107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. “Civilizing Markets: Carbon Trading Between in Vitro and in Vivo Experiments.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, no. 3 (2009): 535–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, F. “Türkiye'de Uygulanan ve Gönüllü Karbon Piyasalarında Faaliyette Bulunan Projelerin Paydaş Katılımı Açısından Değerlendirilmesi.” Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 3, no. 1 (2018): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Carton, W. “Environmental Protection as Market Pathology? Carbon Trading and the Dialectics of the ‘Double Movement.’” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32, no. 6 (2014): 1002–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W. “Dancing to the Rhythms of the Fossil Fuel Landscape: Landscape Inertia and the Temporal Limits to Market-Based Climate Policy.” Antipode 49, no. 1 (2017): 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. “Crisis, Continuity and Change: Neoliberalism, the Left and the Future of Capitalism.” Antipode 41, no. 1 (2010): 185–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., and J. Timmons Roberts. “Climate Change and the Transition to Neoliberal Environmental Governance.” Global Environmental Change 46 (2017): 148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J., and D. C. Suarez. “Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of ‘Selling Nature to Save it.’” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106, no. 3 (2016): 653–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development). “Carbon Markets”, n.d. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://turkishcarbonmarket.com/carbon-markets.
   Google Scholar
• Ecofys. Roadmap for the consideration of establishment and operation of a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading System in Turkey, 2016. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://pmrturkiye.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ETSFinalReport_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace. Raising Ambition State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2016, 2016. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_5242.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace. Fortifying the Foundation: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2009, 2009. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_2343.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace. Unlocking Potential State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2017, 2017. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://www.cbd.int/financial/2017docs/carbonmarket2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, C. “The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business.” European Management Journal 25, no. 6 (2007): 453–463.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğdu, E. “Turkish Support to Kyoto Protocol: A Reality or Just an Illusion.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 3 (2010): 1111–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, A. “Transformation of the Water-Energy Nexus in Turkey: Re-Imagining Hydroelectricity Infrastructure.” Energy Research and Social Science 41 (2018): 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, E., and A. Kandemir. “Turkey Faces Ticking Bomb with Energy Loans of $51 Billion.” Accessed July 30, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-11/turkey-faces-ticking-time-bomb-with-energy-loans-of-51-billion.
   Google Scholar
• Ervine, K. “How Low Can It Go? Analysing the Political Economy of Carbon Market Design and Low Carbon Prices.” New Political Economy (2017): 1–21. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1384454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. Turkey Progress Report 2014. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-turkey-progress-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Turkey 2015 Report. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_report_turkey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Turkey 2016 Report. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_report_turkey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Turkey 2018 Report. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felli, R. “On Climate Rent.” Historical Materialism 22, no. 3-4 (2014): 251–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felli, R. “Environment, not Planning: the Neoliberal Depoliticisation of Environmental Policy by Means of Emissions Trading.” Environmental Politics 24, no. 5 (2015): 641–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felli, R. “Beyond the Critique of Carbon Markets: The Real Utopia of a Democratic Climate Protection Agency.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences (in press. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertson, T. Carbon Pricing: A Critical Perspective for Community Resistance. Indigenous Environmental Network and Climate Justice Alliance. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://www.ienearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Carbon-Pricing-A-Critical-Perspective-for-Community-Resistance-Online-Version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. “Don't Link Carbon Markets.” Nature 543, no. 7646 (2017): 484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffron, R. J., and D. McCauley. “What is the ‘Just Transition’?” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 88 (2018): 74–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C. “Carbon Trading: a Review of the Kyoto Mechanisms.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32 (2007): 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership). Emissions Trading Worldwide ICAP Status Report, 2016. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://icapcarbonaction.com/images/StatusReport2016/ICAP_Status_Report_2016_Online.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). World Energy Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jevnaker, T., and J. Wettestad. “Linked Carbon Markets: Silver Bullet, or Castle in the Air?” Climate Law 6, no. 1-2 (2016): 142–151.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., and P. Newell. “Sustainability Transitions and the State.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (in press. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., R. K. Wurzel, and A. R. Zito. “Still the Century of ‘New’ Environmental Policy Instruments? Exploring Patterns of Innovation and Continuity.” Environmental Politics 22, no. 1 (2013): 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. “Radical Dematerialization and Degrowth.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, no. 2095 (2017): 20160383.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., E. Gómez-Baggethun, and C. Zografos. “To Value or not to Value? That is not the Question.” Ecological Economics 94 (2013): 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-Hayes, J. “The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Value in Financialization: Analysis of the Infrastructure of Carbon Markets.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 50 (2013): 117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuch, D. The Rise and Fall of Carbon Emissions Trading. Hampshire: Springer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kuş, M., H. Ülgen, Y. Güneş, R. Kırış, A. Özel, and U. Zeydanlı. “Carbon Certification of Afforestation and Reforestation Areas in Turkey.” In Carbon Management, Technologies, and Trends in Mediterranean Ecosystems, edited by Sabit Erşahin, Selim Kapur, Erhan Akça, Ayten Namlı, and Hakkı Emrah Erdoğan, 131–137. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R. “The Promiscuous History of Market Efficiency: The Development of Early Emissions Trading Systems.” Environmental Politics 21, no. 4 (2012): 583–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R., and P. Newell. “The Political Economy of Carbon Markets.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy, edited by T. Van de Graaf, B. K. Sovacool, A. Ghosh, F. Kern, and M.T. Klare, 247–267. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R., and B. Stephan. “Zombie Markets or Zombie Analyses? Revivifying the Politics of Carbon Markets.” In The Politics of Carbon Markets, edited by Benjamin Stephan, and Richard Lane, 1–23. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Larry, L. Carbon trading: A critical conversation on climate change, privatisation and power, Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2006. http://www.daghammarskjold.se/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/carbon_trading_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, M. “Carbon Trading: Who Gets What, When, and How?” Global Environmental Politics 17, no. 3 (2017): 134–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, E. “Carbon Trading Dogma: Theoretical Assumptions and Practical Implications of Global Carbon Markets.” Ephemera 17, no. 1 (2017): 61–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, L. “Climate as Investment.” Development and Change 40, no. 6 (2009): 1063–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, L. “Capital and Climate Change.” Development and Change 42, no. 2 (2011): 649–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machaqueiro, R. “The Semiotics of Carbon: Atmospheric Space, Fungibility, and the Production of Scarcity.” Economic Anthropology 4, no. 1 (2017): 82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R., and M. Paterson. “Neoliberal Climate Policy: From Market Fetishism to the Developmental State.” Environmental Politics 21, no. 2 (2012): 230–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, V. N., S. Afionis, J. Paavola, A. J. Dougill, and L. C. Stringer. “Experiences of Host Communities with Carbon Market Projects: Towards Multi-Level Climate Justice.” Climate Policy 14, no. 1 (2014): 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. “A Socioecological fix to Capitalist Crisis and Climate Change? The Possibilities and Limits of Renewable Energy.” Environment and Planning A 47, no. 12 (2015): 2485–2502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., and S. Jenner. “Varieties of Market-Based Policy: Instrument Choice in Climate Policy.” Environmental Politics 25, no. 5 (2016): 853–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methmann, C., and B. Stephan. “Political Sellout! Carbon Markets Between Depoliticising and Repoliticising Climate Politics.” In The Politics of Carbon Markets, edited by Benjamin Stephan, and Richard Lane, 261–279. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• MOEU (Ministry of Environment and Urbanization). Sixth National Communication of Turkey under the UNFCCC, 2016. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/application/pdf/6_bildirim_eng_11_reducedfilesize.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MOEU (Ministry of Environment and Urbanization). Market Readiness Proposal Under the Partnership for Market Readiness Programme, 2013. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/TUR-FINAL-MRP_2013-05-03%20Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini, F. Adaman, B. Aguilar, B. Agarwal, E. Corbera, et al. “Payments for Ecosystem Services and the Fatal Attraction of win-win Solutions.” Conservation Letters 6, no. 4 (2013): 274–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., S. Fankhauser, T. Townshend, M. Collins, T. Landesman, A. Matthews, C. Pavese, K. Rietig, P. Schleifer, and J. Setzer. The GLOBE Climate Legislation Study: A Review of Climate Change Legislation in 66 Countries. Fourth Edition. London: GLOBE International and the Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Narassimhan, E., K. S. Gallagher, S. Koester, and J. R. Alejo. “Carbon Pricing in Practice: a Review of Existing Emissions Trading Systems.” Climate Policy 18, no. 8 (2018): 967–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olçum, G. A., and E. Yeldan. “Economic Impact Assessment of Turkey's Post-Kyoto Vision on Emission Trading.” Energy Policy 60 (2013): 764–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, E. “Türkiye'de gönüllü karbon piyasaları.” 2017. Accessed July 30, 2018. http://bizden.lifenerji.com/bizden-haberler/turkiyede-gonullu-karbon-piyasalari/.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. “Political Economies of Climate Change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 9, no. 2 (2018): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, R. Pricing Carbon in Australia: Contestation, the State and Market Failure. London: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, R., and S. Böhm. “Ten Reasons why Carbon Markets Will not Bring About Radical Emissions Reduction.” Carbon Management 5, no. 4 (2014): 325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMR (Partnership for Market Readiness) Turkey. PMR Project Implementation Status Report, 2017. Accessed July 30, 2018. https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/Turkey_PMR%20ISR_2017_03032017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, O. “Zombie Carbon and Sectoral Market Mechanisms.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 22, no. 4 (2011): 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo Energy & Environment. Assessment of Market Based Climate Change Policy Options for Turkey. 2017. http://pmrturkiye.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/PMR-Turkey_MBI-Final-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., and L. B. Collins. “From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5, no. 3 (2014): 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., and S. La Hoz Theuer. “Environmental Integrity of International Carbon Market Mechanisms Under the Paris Agreement.” Climate Policy (2018): 1–15. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever, D., and N. Bağdadioğlu. “International Arrangements, the Kyoto Protocol and the Turkish Carbon Market.” In Energy and Finance: Sustainability in the Energy Industry, edited by André Dorsman, Özgür Arslan-Ayaydin, and Mehmet Baha Karan, 49–67. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B. “The European Commission’s Shifting Climate Leadership.” Global Environmental Politics 17, no. 3 (2017): 84–104.
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B., and J. Wettestad. EU Emissions Trading: Initiation, Decision-Making and Implementation. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. “Nature as Accumulation Strategy.” Socialist Register 43 (2007): 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Spash, C. L. “The Brave new World of Carbon Trading.” New Political Economy 15, no. 2 (2010): 169–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. H. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E., N. Stern, M. Duan, O. Edenhofer, G. Giraud, G. Heal, E. la Rovere, et al. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, 2017. https://www.carbonpricingleadership.org/s/CarbonPricing_FullReport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. “Apocalypse Forever?” Theory, Culture & Society 27, no. 2-3 (2010): 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansel, C. B. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress.” South European Society and Politics 23, no. 2 (2018): 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telli, Ç., E. Voyvoda, and E. Yeldan. “Economics of Environmental Policy in Turkey: A General Equilibrium Investigation of the Economic Evaluation of Sectoral Emission Reduction Policies for Climate Change.” Journal of Policy Modeling 30, no. 2 (2008): 321–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietenburg, T. H. Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Toklu, E. “Overview of Potential and Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources in Turkey.” Renewable Energy 50 (2013): 456–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turhan, E. “Climate Change Policy in Turkey: Current Opportunities, Persistent Problems: Introduction.” New Perspectives on Turkey 56 (2017): 131–133.
   Google Scholar
• Turhan, E., S. C. Mazlum, Ü. Şahin, A. H. Şorman, and A. Cem Gündoğan. “Beyond Special Circumstances: Climate Change Policy in Turkey 1992–2015.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7, no. 3 (2016): 448–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachou, A., and G. Pantelias. “The EU’s Emissions Trading System, Part 2: A Political Economy Critique.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 28, no. 3 (2017): 108–127.
   Google Scholar
• Yeldan, E. “The Economics of Climate Change Action in Turkey: A Commentary.” New Perspectives on Turkey 56 (2017): 139–145.
   Google Scholar