EU conditionality and desecuritization nexus in Turkey

References

• Acikmese, Sinem. 2010. “Cycles of europeanization in Turkey: The domestic impact of EU political conditionality.” UNISCI Discussion Papers 23: 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Alessandri, Emiliano. 2010. The new Turkish foreign policy and the future of Turkey–EU relations. Istituto Affari Internazionali Documents, no. 1003. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.
   Google Scholar
• Algan, Bülent. 2008. “The brand new version of article 301 of Turkish penal code and the future of freedom of expression cases in Turkey.” German Law Journal 9: 2237–2252.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, Claudia. 2004. “Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, Bülent, and Rabia Karakaya-Polat. 2008. “From conflict to cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey’s relations with Syria and Iran.” Security Dialogue 39: 495–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1968. Men in dark times. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, Mustafa. 2003. “Security conceptualisation in Turkey.” In Security and environment in the mediterranean: Conceptualising security and environmental conflicts, edited by Hans Günter Brauch, P.H. Liotta, Antonio Marquina, Paul Rogers and Mohammed El-Sayed Selim, 345–356. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, Andreas. 2006. “No way out: Desecuritization, emancipation and the eternal return of the political – A reply to Aradau.” Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pınar. 2005. “Turkey’s changing security discourses: The challenge of globalization.” European Journal of Political Research 44: 175–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pınar. 2007. “Making Turkey’s transformation possible: Claiming ‘security-speak’ not desecuritization!.” South East European and Black Sea Studies 7: 555–571.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pınar. 2011. “The politics of studying securitization? The Copenhagen school in Turkey.” Security Dialogue 42: 399–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Cebeci, Münevver. 2007. “The EU’s security impact on Turkey: Democratization and desecuritization.” In The EC/EU: A world security actor, edited by Anne Deighton and Gerard Bossuat, 244–261. Paris: Soleb.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, Ayşe Betul, and Bahar Rumelili. 2006. “Necessary but not sufficient: the role of the EU in resolving Turkey’s Kurdish question and the Greek-Turkish conflicts.” European Foreign Affairs Review 11: 203–222.
   Google Scholar
• Cizre, Umit. 2003. “Demythologyzing the national security concept: The case of Turkey.” The Middle East Journal 57: 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2001. Council decision of 8 March 2001 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with the Republic of Turkey (2001/235/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 85.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2003. Council decision of 19 May 2003 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with Turkey (2003/398/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 145.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2006. Council decision of 23 January 2006 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the accession partnership with Turkey (2006/35/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 22.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2008. Council Decision of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the a Accession partnership with Turkey and repealing decision 2006/35/EC (2008/157/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 51.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, Thomas, Stephan Stettner, and Mathias Albert. 2006. “The European union and border conflicts: The transformative power of integration.” International Organization 60: 563–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, Stefan. 2006. “Should HIV/AIDS be securitized? The ethical dilemmas of linking HIV/AIDS and security.” International Studies Quarterly 50: 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erguvenc, Sadi. 1998. Turkey’s security perceptions. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 3. http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SadiErguvenc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1998. Regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession-1998. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_1998.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1999. 1999 regular report from the Commission on Turkey’s progress towards Turkey’s accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_1999.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. 2000 regular report from the Commission on Turkey’s progress towards Turkey’s accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. 2001 regular report from the Commission on Turkey’s progress towards Turkey’s accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2002. 2002 regular report from the Commission on Turkey’s progress towards Turkey’s accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. 2003 regular report on Turkey’s Progress towards Turkey’s Accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004. 2004 regular report on Turkey’s progress towards Turkey’s accession. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_RealitonsProgress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2005. Turkey 2005 progress report. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. Turkey 2006 progress report. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Turkey 2007 progress report. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/turkey_progress_report_2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Turkey 2008 progress report. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/turkey_progress_report_2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Turkey 2010 progress report accompanying the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council enlargement strategy and main challenges 2010–2011. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Turkey 2011 Progress Report. http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRaporlari/tr_rapport_2011_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Turkey 2012 Progress Report. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2012/package/tr_rapport_2012_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, Rita. 2010. Security and the environment: Securitization theory and US environmental security policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, William. 2003. “Human rights, the European Union and the Turkish accession process.” In Turkey and the European Union: Domestic politics, economic integration and internal dynamics, edited by Ali Çarkoglu and Barry Rubin, 107–126. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene. 2012. “Reconstructing desecuritization: The normative-political in the Copenhagen school and directions for how to apply it.” Review of International Studies 38: 525–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Lene, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. “Digital disaster, cyber security and the Copenhagen school.” International Studies Quarterly 53: 1155–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin, and Aylin Güney. 1996. “The military and democracy in the third Turkish Republic.” Armed Forces & Society 22: 619–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, Jef. 1998. “The question of limit: Desecuritization and the aesthetics of horror in political realism.” Millenium: Journal of International Studies 27: 569–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, Jef. 2004. “Minding exceptions: Politics of insecurity and liberal democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory 3: 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Gareth. 2001. Context and circumstance: The Turkish military and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jutila, Matti. 2006. “Desecuritizing minority rights: Against determinism.” Security Dialogue 37: 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliber, Alper. 2005. “Securing the ground through securitized ‘foreign’ policy: The Cyprus case.” Security Dialogue 36: 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakaya-Polat, Rabia. 2009. “The 2007 parliamentary elections in Turkey: Between securitization and desecuritization.” Parliamentary Affairs 62: 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaosmanoglu, Ali. 2000. “The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey.” Journal of International Affairs 54: 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Karmon, Ely. 1998. “Islamist terrorist activities in Turkey in the 1990s.” Terrorism and Political Violence 10: 101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazan, Isil. 2003. Regionalisation of security and securitisation of a region: Turkish security policy after the Cold War. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Megan. 2009. “Securitization and desecuritization: Female soldiers and reconstruction of women in post-conflict Sierra-Leone.” Security Studies 18: 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Matt. 2008. “Securitization and the construction of security.” European Journal of International Relations 14: 563–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, Gencer. 2006. “National Security Council.” In Almanac Turkey 2005: Security sector and democratic oversight, edited by Umit Cizre, 36–49. Istanbul: TESEV.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, Gencer. 2012. 2000’i yillarda Turkiye’de dis politika yapim sureci [Foreign policy-making process in Turkey in 2000s]. In XXI yüzyılda Türk dis politikasinin analizi [The analysis of Turkish foreign policy in XXI century], ed. Faruk Sonmezoglu, Nurcan Ozgur Baklacioglu and Ozlem Terzi, 5–54. Istanbul: Der.
   Google Scholar
• Paker, Evren Balta. 2010. “Dış tehditten ic tehdide: Turkiye’de doksanlarda ulusal güvenligin yeniden insasi [From external to domestic threat: the re-construction of national security in Turkey in the 90s].” In Turkiye’de ordu, devlet ve guvenlik siyaseti [Army, state and politics of security in Turkey], edited by Evren Balta Paker and Ismet Akca, 351–406. Istanbul: Bilgi.
   Google Scholar
• Political Reforms in Turkey (2007). Ankara: Secretariat General for EU Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Progress Report Prepared by Turkey. 2012. Ankara: Ministry for EU Affairs.http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/2012_ilerleme_raporu_02_01_13_fotomat_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, Paul. 2004. “Securitization and minority rights: Conditions of desecuritization.” Security Dialogue 35: 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, Paul. 2012. “Is securitization a ‘negative’ concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics.” Security Dialogue 43: 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty Trans. G. Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The concept of the political Trans. G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat General for EU Affairs. 2007. Political reforms in Turkey. Ankara: Secretariat General for EU Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Karen. 2003. “The evolution and application of EU membership conditionality.” In The enlargement of the European Union, edited by Marise Cremona, 105–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tank, Pınar. 2002. “Re-solving the Cyprus problem: Changing perceptions of state and societal security.” European Security 11: 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Tank, Pınar. 2005. “The effects of the Iraq war on the Kurdish issue in Turkey.” Conflict, Security and Development 5: 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Turkey’s road to European Union membership: National identity and political change Verney Susannah Ifantis Kostas Routledge Abingdon NY 2009
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. 1995. “Securitisation and desecuritisation.” In On security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. 2000. “EU as a security actor: Reflections from a pessimist constructivist on post-sovereign security order.” In International relations theory and the politics of European integration: Power, security and community, edited by Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams, 250–294. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. 2001. “Identity, communities and foreign policy: Discourse analysis as a foreign policy theory.” In European integration and national identity: The challenge of the Nordic States, edited by Lene Hansen and Ole Wæver, 20–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. 2011. “Politics, security, theory.” Security Dialogue 42: 465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael C. 2003. “Words, images, enemies: Securitisation and international politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47: 511–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael C. 2011. “Securitization and the liberalism of fear.” Security Dialogue 42: 453–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetkin, Murat. 2013. A rare chance in the Kurdish problem. Hurriyet Daily News, January 7.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, Amberin. 1998. Turkish generals vow relentlessly fight. Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 393.
   Google Scholar