Youth participation in local politics: city councils and youth assemblies in Turkey

References

• Agenda 21. 1992. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E., and P. Zetterberg. 2010. A political science perspective on socialization research: Young Nordic citizens in a comparative light. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, eds. L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, and C. A. Flanagan, 43–65. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470767603.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Ataman, A., F. Çok, and T. Şener. 2012. Understanding civic engagement among young Roma and young Turkish people in Turkey. Human Affairs 22, no. 3: 419–433.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. 2015. An integrative model of political and civic participation: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 162–189. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, S., F. Çok, and T. Şener. 2015. Government perspectives on civic and political participation of youth and women in Turkey: Deriving insights from policy documents. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 420–435. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and E. Kalaycıoğlu. 2015. Citizenship in Turkey and in the world. 2014 ISSP Research Report. http://ipc.sabanciuniv.edu/en/publication/citizenship-in-turkey-and-in-the-world-2014-issp-research-report/ (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Çetin, Z.Ö. 2014. The end of local Agenda 21 and its transition to the city councils in Turkey. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology 1, no. 2: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cicognani, E., and B. Zani. 2015. Social and psychological factors influencing political and civic participation: A psychosocial perspective. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 124–145. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doğanay, Ü. 2004. Rethinking democratic procedures: Democracy and deliberative experiences in Turkey’s LA21 process. Political Studies 52, no. 4: 728–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., and E. Amna. 2012. Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs 22: 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Emler, N.P. 2015. Explaining political participation: Integrating levels of analysis. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 146–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emrealp, S. 2005. Türkiye Yerel Gündem 21 Programı [Local Agenda 21 Program in Turkey]. Istanbul: Uluslararası Yerel Yönetimler Birliği, Doğu Akdeniz ve Ortadoğu Bölge Teşkilatı.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Regular report on Turkey’s progress towards accession. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Regular Report on Turkey’s Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, C.A., A.K. Syvertsen, and M.D. Stout. 2007. Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55, May.
   Google Scholar
• Henn, M., and N. Foard. 2012. Young people, political participation and trust in Britain. Parliamentary affairs 65, no. 1: 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvarth, A., and G. Paolini. 2013. Political participation and EU citizenship: Perceptions and behaviours of young people. Report produced by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, C. 2007. Pillars of support for wellbeing in the community: The role of public sector. http://www.e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/handle/2173/17972 (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Karakurt Tosun, E., and E.B. Keskin. 2015. City councils as a means of local participation in Turkey during the EU membership process: The investigation of the awareness of the Bursa city council. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 13, no. 3: 363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Keeter, S., K. Jenkins, C. Zukin, and M. Andolina. 2003. Three core measures of community-based civic engagement: Evidence from the youth civic engagement indicators project. Presented at the Child Trends Conference on Indicators of Positive Development, March 11–12, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• The City Council Regulation. 2006. Resmi Gazete, no. 26313, October 8.
   Google Scholar
• KONDA. 2011. Türkiye Gençliği Araştırması. http://www.konda.com.tr/tr/raporlar/2011_05_KONDA_Turkiye_Gencligi_Arastirmasi.pdf (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• KONDA. 2016. Demokrasi Nöbeti Araştırması, Meydanların Profili. http://konda.com.tr/demokrasinobeti/ (accessed August 25, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtaran, Y. 2008. The role of the state in youth-related activities. In Youth work and policies in Turkey, eds. N. Yentürk, Y. Kurtaran, and G. Nemutlu, 70–100. Youth studies unit research paper no. 3, November. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University, Youth Studies Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtaran, Y., G. Nemutlu, and N. Yentürk. 2008. About, for, and Together with Youth - A Summary of “Youth Work and Policy in Turkey.” In Youth work and policies in Turkey, eds. N. Yentürk, Y. Kurtaran, and G. Nemutlu, 7–21. Youth studies unit research paper no. 3, November. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University, Youth Studies Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Lüküslü, D. 2008. Günümüz Türkiye gençliği: ne kayıp bir kuşak ne de ülkenin aydınlık geleceği [Modern-day Youth in Turkey: Neither a lost generation, nor the bright future of the country]. In Türkiye’de Gençlik Çalışması ve Politikaları [Youth Research and Politics in Turkey], eds. N. Yentürk and Y. Kurtaran, 287–297. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Lüküslü, D. 2011. Bilişim Teknolojileriyle Örgütlenen Gençlik Hareketleri ve Yeni Bir Siyaset Arayışı [Youth Movements Organized via Information Technologies and a New Search for Politics]. In Katılımın E-Hali: Gençlerin Sanal Alemi [The E-Version of Participation: The Virtual World of the Youth], ed. A. Telli Aydemir. İstanbul: Alternatif Bilişim.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, C. 2015. Democratic ownership and deliberative participation. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 124–145. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Municipal Law. 2005. Law No. 5393, Acceptance Date: 3.7.2005, Official Gazette Date: 13.07.2005. www.ibb.gov.tr/en-US/.../MUNICIPAL%20Law%20Nr.5393.doc (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Nemutlu, G., and Y. Kurtaran. 2008. Youth work-based policy proposals. In Youth work and policies in Turkey, eds. N. Yentürk, Y. Kurtaran, and G. Nemutlu, 22–41. Youth studies unit research paper no. 3, November. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University, Youth Studies Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Neyzi, L. 2001. Object or subject? The paradox of ‘youth’ in Turkey. International Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 3: 411–432.10.1017/S002074380100304X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyzi, L. 2011. Türkiye’de Kamusal Söylemde Gençlik Kurgusunun Degisimi [The Change of Youth Construct in Public Discourse in Turkey]. In Katılımın E-Hali: Gençlerin Sanal Alemi [The E-Version of Participation: The Virtual World of the Youth], ed. A. Telli Aydemir. İstanbul: Alternatif Bilişim.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, S. 2014. A moment of elation: The Gezi protests/resistance and the fading of the AKP project. In The making of a protest movement in Turkey, ed. U. Ozkirimli, 7–24. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• The PIDOP Project. 2012. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/775796/1/Barrett%20(2012).pdf (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6, no. 1: 65–78.10.1353/jod.1995.0002
   Google Scholar
• Sander, T.H., and R.D. Putnam. 2010. Still bowling alone?: The post-9/11 split. Journal of Democracy 21, no. 1: 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samara’s Democracy. 2015. Message not delivered: The myth of apathetic youth and the importance of contact in political participation. http://www.samaracanada.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/samara-messagenotdelivered-g.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Saral, B. 2011. Türkiye’de Gençlik Örgütlenmelerinin Yasal Düzenlemelere Katkısı [Contribution of Youth Organizations in Turkey to Legal Acts]. In Katılımın E-Hali: Gençlerin Sanal Alemi [The E-Version of Participation: The Virtual World of the Youth], ed. A. Telli Aydemir. İstanbul: Alternatif Bilişim.
   Google Scholar
• Şener, T. 2014a. Civic and political participation of women and youth in Turkey: An examination of perspectives of public authorities and NGOs. Journal of Civil Society 10, no. 1: 69–81.10.1080/17448689.2013.862083
   Google Scholar
• Şener, T. 2014b. Participation among Turkish, Roma, and Bulgarian resettler youth living in Turkey. In Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives, eds. M. Barrett and B. Zani, 334–351. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 2003. Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedenburg, T. 2007. Imagined youths. Middle East Report 37, no. 245: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Telli Aydemir, Aslı. ed. 2011. Katılımın e-hali, Gençlerin Sanal Alemi [The E-Version of Participation: The Virtual World of the Youth]. İstanbul: Alternatif Bilişim.
   Google Scholar
• Toprak, B. 2009. Türkiye’de Farklı Olmak; Din ve Muhafazakârlık Ekseninde Ötekileştirilenler [Being Different in Turkey: Otherization on the Axis of Religion and Conservatism]. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, J., R. Lehmann, H. Oswald, and W. Schulz. 2001. Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen (CIVED). The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~jtpurta/interreport.htm (accessed July 13, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Turan, İ. 2016. İlter Turan’dan ‘Nöbet’ yorumu: AKP’nin amacı safları sıklaştırmak [‘Rally’ Comment from Ilter Turan: Goal of the AKP is to close the ranks]. Cumhuriyet, August 29.
   Google Scholar
• Van Stekelenburg, J., and B. Klandermans. 2013. The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology, 61, no. 5–6: 886–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, and H.E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yentürk, N. 2008. Youth policy proposals in areas surrounding the lives of young people. In Youth work and policies in Turkey, eds. N. Yentürk, Y. Kurtaran, and G. Nemutlu, 41–70. Youth studies unit research paper no. 3, November. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University, Youth Studies Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Zani, B., and M. Barrett. 2012. Engaged citizens? Political participation and social engagement among youth, women, minorities, and migrants. Human Affairs 22: 273–282.
   Google Scholar