Entering the Brussels arena: Slovenian interest groups and the pursuit of a dual strategy

References

• Arras, S., and C. Braun. 2017. Stakeholders wanted! Why and how European Union agencies involve non-state stakeholders. Journal of European Public Policy doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1307438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., J. Beyers, C. Braun, M. Hanegraaff, and D. Lowery. 2018. Making inference across mobilisation and influence research: Comparing top-down and bottom-up mapping of interest systems. Political Studies 66, no. 1: 43–62. doi:10.1177/0032321717702400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. 2002. Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation on domestic interest associations. European Journal of Political Research 41, no. 5: 585–612. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., and B. Kerremans. 2007. Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 460–81. doi:10.1080/13501760701243822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A.S., and A. Rasmussen. 2015. Comparing the domestic and the EU lobbying context: Perceived agenda-setting influence in the multi-level system of the European union. Journal of European Public Policy 22, no. 4: 552–69. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1008553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouza García, L. 2015. Linking disconnected spaces or venue shopping? Trade-offs in participatory opportunities in the EU. Social Movement Studies 14, no. 5: 557–75. doi:10.1080/14742837.2014.945074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouza García, L. 2016. The representation of spanish civil society in contentious policy debates. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, September 7–10, in Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Chaqués Bonafont, L., and L.M. Márquez. 2016. Venue shopping strategies in multilevel system of governance. Paper presented at ECPR General Conference, September 7–10, in Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 2007. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 333–45. doi:10.1080/13501760701243731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Črnak-Meglič, A., and T. Rakar. 2009. The role of the third sector in the Slovenian welfare system. Teorija in Praksa 46, no. 3: 237–54.
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, C., B. Steunenberg and R. Corbett. 2000. Forum section: understanding the EU Legislative process: codecision: towards a bicameral European Union. European Union Politics 1, no. 3: 365–71.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2017. The participating gap. Social status and political inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2012. Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 7: 969–87. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.672103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2014. The Europeanization of interest groups: Group type, resources and policy areas. European Union Politics 15, no. 4: 572–94. doi:10.1177/1465116514532556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2004. Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union. Governance. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 17, no. 2: 211–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2008. Interest Groups in EU Policy-making. Living Reviews in European Governance 3: 4. http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-4.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Standard Eurobarometer 88. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Fink Hafner, D. 2007. Lobiranje in njegova regulacija. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fink Hafner, D., and D. Lajh. 2008. The 2008 Slovenian EU presidency: A new synergy for Europe? A midterm report. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fink Hafner, D., M. Hafner Fink, and M. Novak. 2015. Europeanisation as a factor of national interest group political-cultural change: The case of interest groups in Slovenia. East European Politics and Societies 29, no. 1: 287–305. doi:10.1177/0888325414535625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink-Hafner, D., D. Lajh, M. Hafner-Fink, S. Kustec-Lipicer, A. Krašovec, T. Deželan, M. Knep, and M. Novak. 2012. Formation of policy networks and lobbying in slovenia [data file]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Fink-Hafner, D., M. Hafner-Fink, M. Novak, L. Kronegger, D. Lajh, and Ž. Ana. 2016. Primerjalno raziskovanje organizacijskega razvoja nacionalnih interesnih skupin v Evropi. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Fink, M., M. Novak, D. Fink-Hafner, R. Eising, R. Daniel, and P. Rozbicka. 2016. Giants and dwarfs: The multilevel lobbying strategies of national interest organisations. Teorija in Praksa 53, no. 3: 605–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2017. The organic crisis of the british state: Putting brexit in its place. Globalizations 14, no. 1: 133–41. doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1228783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., R. Scaramuzzino, and M. Wennerhag. 2016. In and beyond the Brussel bubble? domestic civil society organizations use of Europe as a means to seek political influence. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, September 7–10, in Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, G., D. Halpin, and W. Maloney. 2004. Defining interests: Disambiguation and the need for new distinctions? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6, no. 2: 195–212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00134.x
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. 2003. Civil society and accountability. Journal of Human Development 4, no. 1: 5–27. doi:10.1080/1464988032000051469
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. 2010. Europeanization of lobbying activities: When national interest groups spill over to the European level. Journal of European Integration 32, no. 2: 175–91. doi:10.1080/07036330903486037
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 1997. Organized Interests in the EC and the European Parliament. European Integration Online Paper 1, no. 9. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-009a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 2009. The three worlds of European civil society—What role for civil society for what kind of Europe? Policy and Society 28, no. 1: 47–57. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 2010. Civil society and EU democracy: ‘Astroturf’ representation? Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 1: 100–16. doi:10.1080/13501760903464986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krašovec, A., and L. Damjan. 2010. Specialisti za zadeve Evropske unije in njihova vloga v volilnih procesih. In Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009, ed. A. Krašovec, 117–40. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Lajh, D. 2012. Twenty years of relations between the Republic of Slovenia and the European Union. Studia Historica Slovenica 12, no. 1: 125–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, E., and T. Sedelius. 2014. National linkages and ambiguous EU approaches among European civil society organisations. Journal of Contemporary European Research 10, no. 3: 322–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. 2004. The power of institutions. State and interest group activity and the European Union. European Union Politics 5, no. 4: 441–66. doi:10.1177/1465116504047312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C., and M.J. Beckstrand. 2011. Following the money: European Union funding of civil society organizations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 6: 1339–61. doi:10.1111/jcms.2011.49.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. 2002. NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies 2, no. 1: 5–22. doi:10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., and E. Bomberg. 2003. Making sense of EU decision making. In The European Union. Readings on the theory and practice of European integration, 3rd ed., ed. B.F. Nelsen and A. Stubb, 313–33. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Quittkat, C. 2011. The European commission’s online consultations: A success story? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 3: 653–74. doi:10.1111/jcms.2011.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozbicka, P., 2016. National venue shopping in the European policy making. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Multi-level representation in the European Union’, April 28–29, in Bochum, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzza, C. and E. Bozzini. 2008. Organised civil society and European governance: Routes of contestation. European Political Science 7: 296–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez Salgado, R. 2014a. Europeanizing civil society. How the EU shapes civil society organizations. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Salgado, R. 2014b. Rebalancing EU interest Representation? Associative democracy and EU funding of civil society organizations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no. 2: 337–53. doi:10.1111/jcms.2014.52.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union). 2012. Official journal of the European Union C 326/47. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A., F.R. Baumgartner, C. Mahoney, and J. Berkhout. 2009. Measuring the size and scope of the EU interest group population. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, September 10–12, in Potsdam, Germany.
   Google Scholar