The Rise of Populism in Turkey: A Content Analysis

References

• Akkerman, A., C. Mudde, and A. Zaslove. 2014. How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies 47, no. 9: 1324–53. doi:10.1177/0010414013512600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Jazeera. 2017. Turkey opens trial of suspected military coup plotters. aljazeera.com. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/05/turkey-opens-trial-suspected-military-coup-plotters-170522125444791.html ( accessed May 22.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2016. Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies 64, no. 1: 88–104. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. 2017. Measuring populist discourse with semantic text analysis: an application on grassroots populist mobilization. Quality & Quantity 1, no. 23. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0517-4.
   Google Scholar
• Avcı, G. 2011. The nationalist movement party’s euroscepticism: Party ideology meets strategy. South European Society and Politics 16, no. 3: 435–47. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.598359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayata, S., and A.G. Ayata. 2007. The center left parties in Turkey. Turkish Studies 8, no. 2: 211–32. doi:10.1080/14683840701314126.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and E. Elçi. 2019. Populism in Turkey. In Populism around the world, ed. D. Stockemer, 89–108. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and Ç. Ali. 2019. Ethnicity and religiosity-based prejudice in Turkey: Evidence from a survey experiment. International Political Science Review 40, no. 1: 58–72. doi:10.1177/0192512117696333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and Ö. Ziya. 2014. Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics 47, no. 1: 41–59. doi:10.5129/001041514813623137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R.R. 2009. Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics 15, no. 1: 29–48. doi:10.1177/1354068808097890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, N. 1964. The development of secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2016. On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1: 5–19. doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., and N. Gidron. 2015. The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces 94, no. 4: 1593–621. doi:10.1093/sf/sov120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora, T., and N. Canefe. 2008. Türkiye’de Popülist Milliyetçilik [Populist nationalism in Turkey]. In Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Milliyetçilik [Political thought in modern Turkey: Nationalism], ed. T. Bora and M. Gültekingil, 635–62. Istanbul: İletişim.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 2005. The people. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and M.J. Hinich. 2006. A spatial analysis of Turkish party preferences. Electoral Studies 25, no. 2: 369–92. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2012. Voting behavior in Turkey. In Handbook of modern Turkey, ed. M. Heper and S. Sayarı, 160–70. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, M., and Ç. Çağkan Sayın. 2014. Reproducing the paradigm of democracy in Turkey: Parochial democratization in the decade of justice and development party. Turkish Studies 15, no. 3: 365–85. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.954743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, M. 2018. Turkey’s ‘Western’ or ‘Muslim’ identity and the AKP’s civilizational discourse. Turkish Studies 19, no. 2: 176–97. doi:10.1080/14683849.2017.1411199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşar, S., and Özman A. 2004. Centre-right politics in Turkey after the November 2002 general election: Neo-liberalism with a Muslim face. Contemporary Politics 10, no. 1: 57–74. doi:10.1080/13569770410001701233.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 2016. Facing up the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy 26, no. 1: 141–55. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçşahin, Ş. 2012. A symptomatic analysis of the justice and development party’s populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition 47, no. 4: 618–40. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elchardus, M., and B. Spruyt. 2014. Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: An empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology. Government and Opposition 51, no. 1: 111–33. doi:10.1017/gov.2014.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. Agglutination. britannica.com. https://www.britannica.com/topic/agglutination-grammar ( accessed February 10.)
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, N. 1998. Demokratik soldan devrimci Yol’a: 1970ʹlerde Sol Popülizm Üzerine Notlar. Toplum Ve Bilim 78: 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Erem, O., 2018. OHAL sona erdi: İki yıllık sürecin bilançosu. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-44799489 ( accessed July 19).
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and Ş. Gümüşçü. 2017. Turkey: How the coup failed. Journal of Democracy 28, no. 1: 59–73. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and G. Şebnem. 2016. Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 37, no. 9: 1581–606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinal, C., 2015. A case study into the making and evolution of populist discourse: Examining Hugo Chávez’s discourse and its radicalisation through time. LSE Research. http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/degreeProgrammes/programmes/undergraduate/pdf/GV390-Cristina-Espinal.pdf ( accessed August 3).
   Google Scholar
• Font, N., P. Graziano, and M. Tsakatika. 2019. Varieties of inclusionary populism? SYRIZA, podemos and the five star movement. Government and Opposition 1–21. doi:10.1017/gov.2019.17.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, I.N. 2016. The Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) and the 2015 elections. Turkish Studies 17, no. 1: 39–46. doi:10.1080/14683849.2015.1136086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülmez, S.B. 2013. The EU Policy of the Republican People’s Party under Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu: A new wine in an old wine cellar. Turkish Studies 14, no. 2: 311–28. doi:10.1080/14683849.2013.802924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., and R. Vliegenthart. 2019. The rise of a populist zeitgeist? A content analysis of populist media coverage in newspapers published between 1990 and 2017. Journalism Studies 1–18. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2019.1620114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K.A. 2009. Is chavez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 8: 1040–67. doi:10.1177/0010414009331721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K.A. 2010. Venezuela’s chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K.A., and B. Castanho Silva. 2018. Textual analysis. In The ideational approach to populism, ed. K.A. Hawkins, R.E. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, 27–42. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, R., 2013. Rmisc: Ryan miscellaneous. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rmisc.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S.P. 1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46, no. 3: 319–45. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 1994. Elections and party preferences in Turkey: changes and continuities in the 1990s. Comparative Political Studies 27, no. 3: 402–24. doi:10.1177/0010414094027003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, W. 2011. Yoshikoder: Cross-platform multilingual content analysis. Java Software Version 0.6 5. http://www.yoshikoder.org
   Google Scholar
• Luhn, H.P. 1966. Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (KWIC Index). In Readings in Automatic Language Processing, ed. D.G. Hays, 159–67. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C.D., and H. Schutze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, L. 2017. Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, no. 2: 282–303. doi:10.1177/1369148117701753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardin, Ş. 1973. Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics?. Daedalus 102, no. 1: 169–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., and Y. Surel. 2002. The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Democracies and the populist challenge, ed. Y. Mény and Y. Surel, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mert, N. 2007. Merkez Sağın Kısa Tarihi [A concise history of the centre-right]. Istanbul: Selis Kitaplar.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B., and S. Tormey. 2014. Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies 62, no. 2: 381–97. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2017. An ideational approach. In The oxford handbook of populism, ed. C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P.A. Taggart, P.O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy, 27–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48, no. 2: 147–74. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.W. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Öktem, K., and K. Akkoyunlu. 2016. Exit from democracy: illiberal governance in Turkey and beyond. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 469–80. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1253231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTV. 2017. MHP Genel Başkanı Devlet Bahçeli NTV’de [MHP Chairman Devlet Bahceli on NTV]. ntv. http://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/mhp-genel-baskani-devlet-bahceli-ntvde,c6CZp-ksz0y8IpxK-I6BRg ( accessed April 14).
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J.E., and W.M. Rahn. 2016. Rise of the trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667, no. 1: 189–206. doi:10.1177/0002716216662639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2015. Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator 50, no. 2: 22–41. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. 2017. Global shifts and the limits of the EU’s transformative power in the European periphery: Comparative perspectives from Hungary and Turkey. Government and Opposition 15, no. 2: 226–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ostiguy, P. 2017. Populism: A socio-cultural approach. In The oxford handbook of populism, ed. C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P.O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy, 73–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2000. Contemporary Turkish politics: challenges to democratic consolidation. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2006. From political Islam to conservative democracy: The case of the justice and development party in Turkey. South European Society and Politics 11, no. 3–4: 543–57. doi:10.1080/13608740600856561.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, T.S. 2014. Populist democracies: Post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary. Government and Opposition 49, no. 1: 1–23. doi:10.1017/gov.2013.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, T. 2011. Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 21, no. 1: 97–119. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.539483.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., T. Aalberg, F. Esser, J. Strömback, and C.H. de Vreese. 2017. Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In Populist political communication in Europe, ed. T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömback, and C.H. de Vreese, 12–24. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. 2014. The mesmerizing message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies 62, no. 4: 726–44. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., B. Burgoon, E.J. van Elsas, and H.G. van de Werfhorst. 2017. Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics 18, no. 4: 536–59. doi:10.1177/1465116517718091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., and T. Pauwels. 2011. Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics 34, no. 6: 1272–83. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.616665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. 2017. Drivers of populism: A Four-country comparison of party communication in the run-up to the 2014 European Parliament Elections. Political Studies. doi:0032321717723506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selçuk, O. 2016. Strong presidents and weak institutions: populism in Turkey, Venezuela, and Ecuador. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 571–89. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C., I.A. Bruno, E. Anduiza, N. Blanuša, Y.M. Corti, G. Delfino, G. Rico, et al. 2018. Public opinion surveys: A new scale. In The ideational approach to populism, ed. K.A. Hawkins, R.E. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C. Rovira Kaltwasser, 150–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C., F.V. Bruno, and L. Littvay. 2017. The elite is up to something: Exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories. Swiss Political Science Review 23, no. 4: 423–43. doi:10.1111/spsr.12270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, M. 2016. Understanding Turkey’s democratic breakdown: old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 481–503. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1246548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, M. 2019. Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1: 42–61. doi:10.1177/0002716218818056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. 2011. Populism, nationalism, or national populism? An analysis of Slovak voting behaviour at the 2010 parliamentary election. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44, no. 4: 257–70. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunar, İ. 1990. Populism and patronage: The demokrat party and its legacy in Turkey. Il Politico 55, no. 4: 745–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tekdemir, Ö. 2016. Conflict and reconciliation between Turks and Kurds: the HDP as an agonistic actor. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 651–69. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1246521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekdemir, Ö. 2019. Left-wing populism within horizontal and vertical politics: the case of Kurdish-led radical democracy in agonistic pluralism. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 21, no. 3: 335–49. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1497756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toprak, Z. 2013. Türkiye’de Popülizm [Populism in Turkey]. Istanbul: Doğan Kitap.
   Google Scholar
• Türk, H.B. 2018. ‘Populism as a medium of mass mobilization’: The case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. International Area Studies Review 21, no. 2: 150–68. doi:10.1177/2233865918761111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. 2001. Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics 34, no. 1: 1–22. doi:10.2307/422412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. http://ggplot2.org
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., F. Esser, M. Wettstein, S. Engesser, D. Wirz, A. Schulz, N. Ernst, et al. 2016. The appeal of populist ideas, strategies, and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. Zurich: NCCR Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Yabanci, B. 2016. Populism as the problem child of democracy: the AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 591–617. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1242204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M.H., and B. Balcı. eds. 2018. Turkey’s July 15th coup what happened and Why. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar