Economic voting in Turkey: single- vs. multi-party governments

References

• Akarca, A., and C. Başlevent. 2009. Inter-party vote movements in Turkey: The sources of AKP Votes in 2007. Iktisat, Işletme Ve Finans 24, no. 285: 32–47. doi:10.3848/iif.2009.285.2511.
   Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2009. A prediction for AKP’s nationwide vote share in the 29 March 2009 Turkish local elections. Iktisat Işletme Ve Finans 24, no. 276: 7–22. doi:10.3848/iif.2009.276.4172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2010. Analysis of the 2009 Turkish election results from an economic voting perspective. European Research Studies Journal 13: 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2011. A prediction for AKP’s nationwide vote share in the 12 June 2011 Turkish parliamentary election. Iktisat Işletme Ve Finans 26, no. 302: 53–74. doi:10.3848/iif.2011.302.5374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2015a. Putting Turkey’s June and November 2015 election outcomes in perspective. Insight Turkey 17: 81–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2015b. Modeling political performance of Islamist and Islamist-rooted parties in Turkey. Middle East Development Journal 7: 49–69. doi:10.1080/17938120.2015.1019295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T. 2019. Political determinants of Turkish government structure and economic performance since 1950. In Economic miracles in european economies, ed. M. Osinska, 35–60. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T., and A. Tansel. 2006. Economic performance and political outcomes: An analysis of the Turkish parliamentary and local election results between 1950 and 2004. Public Choice 129: 77–105. doi:10.1007/s11127-005-9013-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T., and A. Tansel. 2007. Social and economic determinants of Turkish voter choice in the 1995 parliamentary election. Electoral Studies 26: 633–47. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T., and A. Tansel. 2016. Turkish voter response to government incompetence and corruption related to the 1999 earthquakes. Journal of Economic Studies 43: 309–35. doi:10.1108/JES-07-2014-0115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akarca, A.T., and C. Başlevent. 2011. Persistence in regional voting patterns in Turkey during a period of major political realignment. European Urban and Regional Studies 18: 184–202. doi:10.1177/0969776411399342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C.J. 2000. Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies 19: 151–70. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelova, M., T. Konig, and S. Proksch. 2016. Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Electoral Studies 43: 133–49. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C. 2012. The region-of-origin effect revisited: More on the behavior of Turkey’s internal migrants. Economics Bulletin 32: 112–21.
   Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., and H. Kirmanoğlu. 2016. Economic voting in Turkey: Perceptions, expectations, and the party choice. Research and Policy on Turkey 1: 88–101. doi:10.1080/23760818.2015.1099784.
   Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., H. Kirmanoğlu, and B. Şenatalar. 2009. Party preferences and economic voting in Turkey (Now That the Crisis Is Over). Party Politics 15: 377–391. doi:10.1177/1354068808097896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, K., and F. Rosenbluth. 2006. Short versus long coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the size of the public sector. American Journal of Political Science 50: 251–265. doi:10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar, S., B. Mukherjee, and W.H. Moore. 2011. Time horizons matter: The hazard rate of coalition governments and the size of government. Economics of Governance 12: 201–235. doi:10.1007/s10101-011-0096-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2008. Ideology or economic pragmatism: Profiling Turkish voters in 2007. Turkish Studies 9: 317–344. doi:10.1080/14683840802012074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2012. Economic evaluations vs. ideology: Diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002–2011. Electoral Studies 31: 513–521. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, K. 2016. Local determinants of an emerging electoral hegemony: The case of justice and development party (AKP) in Turkey. Democratization 23: 1216–1235. doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1077228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, M., M. Stegmaier, and J. Tosun. 2014. Economic voting under coalition governments: Evidence from Germany. Political Science Research and Methods 2: 49–67. doi:10.1017/psrm.2013.16.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, R., W. Przepiorka, and R.T. Stevenson. 2015. Responsibility attribution for collective decision makers. American Journal of Political Science 59: 372–389. doi:10.1111/ajps.12140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J. 1970. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 38: 410–421. doi:10.2307/1909547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S.D., and S.B. Hobolt. 2010. Coalition government and electoral accountability. Electoral Studies 29: 358–69. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., and M. Nishikawa. 2014. The dynamics of within-regime stability: Party tenure and economic performance. International Political Science Review 35: 430–447. doi:10.1177/0192512113492261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y. 2007. Electoral volatility in Turkey: Cleavages vs. the economy. Institute of Developing Economies: Chiba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y., 2009. Economic voting and electoral volatility in Turkish provinces. Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper No. 202, Chiba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y., 2012. Non-economic voting and incumbent strength in Turkey. Institute of developing economies. Discussion Paper No. 340, Chiba, Japan. .
   Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y. 2018. Economic and corruption voting in a predominant party system: The case of Turkey. Acta Politica 53: 121–148. doi:10.1057/s41269-017-0041-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, T., and D. Samuels. 2008. Electoral accountability and the variety of democratic regimes. British Journal of Political Science 38: 65–90. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., J. Tilley, and S. Banducci. 2013. Clarity of responsibility: How government cohesion conditions performance voting. European Journal of Political Research 52: 164–187. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2013.52.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işık, O., and M.M. Pınarcıoğlu. 2010. Back to the year when it all started: Local determinants of party preferences in 2002 Turkish elections. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 27: 161–183. doi:10.4305/METU.JFA.2010.1.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2014. Local elections and the Turkish voter: Looking for the determinants of party choice. South European Society and Politics 19: 583–600. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.993511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2018. Two elections and a political regime in crisis: Turkish politics at the crossroads. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18: 21–51. doi:10.1080/14683857.2017.1379148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köksal, B., A. Civan, and S. Genç. 2010. An analysis of the shift in the voter preferences in 2009 Turkish local elections. Iktisat Işletme Ve Finans 25: 9–28. doi:10.3848/iif.2010.289.2683.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. Effective number of parties: A measure with application to west europe. Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2015. Economic evaluations and electoral consequences. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2nd. ed. J.D. Wright. Vol. 7, 26–32. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M.C. Lobo. 2017. The economic vote: Ordinary vs. extraordinary times. In The Sage Handbook of electoral behaviour, ed. K. Arzheimer, J. Evans, and M.S. Lewis-Beck, 606–629. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2019. Economic voting. In The Oxford Handbook of public choice, ed. R.D. Congleton, B. Grofman, and S. Voight. Vol. 1, 247–265. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Paldam. 2000. Economic voting: An introduction. Electoral Studies 19: 113–121. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00042-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2008. The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18: 303–323. doi:10.1080/17457280802227710.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, D. 2016. Votes and regional economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. World Development 78: 477–95. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., R.G. Niemi, and A. Yoshinaka. 2002. A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context across time and nations. Electoral Studies 21: 403–423. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G.B., and G.D. Whitten. 1993. A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37: 391–414. doi:10.2307/2111378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, M., and M.S. Lewis-Beck. 2013. Economic voting. In Oxford bibliographies in political science, ed. R. Valelly, 1–25. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, M., M.S. Lewis-Beck, and B. Park. 2017. The VP-function: A review. In The Sage Handbook of electoral behaviour, ed. K. Arzheimer, J. Evans, and M.S. Lewis-Beck, 584–605. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmaier, M., and L.K. Williams. 2016. Forecasting the 2015 British election through party popularity functions. Electoral Studies 41: 260–263. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, E. 2011. Forecasting elections in Turkey. International Journal of Forecasting 27: 1248–1258. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, E. 2012. Forecasting local elections in Turkey. International Journal of Forecasting 28: 813–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G.,. 1995. Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325. doi:10.1017/S0007123400007225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press/Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2002. Osmanlıdan Günümüze Seçimler: 1877–1999. Ankara, Turkey: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2007. 22 Temmuz 2007 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2009. 29 Mart 2009 İl Genel Meclisi ve Belediye Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2010. 1950 Seçimleri. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2011a. 1954 Seçimleri. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2011b. 12 Haziran 2011 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2012a. 1957 Seçimleri. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. 2012b. 1961 Seçimleri. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E., and B. Tuncer. 2016. 1 Kasım 2015 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E.,, and C. Kasapbaş. 2004. 28 Mart 2004 İl Genel Meclisi ve Belediye Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E. C. Kasapbaş, and B. Tuncer. 2003. 3 Kasım 2002 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E., and H. Yurtseven. 2018. 24 Haziran 2018 Cumhurbaşkanlığı ve Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E., H. Yurtseven, and B. Tuncer. 2014. 30 Mart 2014 İl Genel Meclisi ve Belediye Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncer, E., H. Yurtseven, and B. Tuncer. 2015. 7 Haziran 2015 Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri: Sayısal ve Siyasal Değerlendirme. Ankara: TESAV.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817–838. doi:10.2307/1912934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten, G.D.,, and H.D. Palmer. 1999. Cross-national analyses of economic voting. Electoral Studies 18: 49–67. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00043-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L.K., M. Stegmaier, and M. Debus. 2017. Relaxing the constant economic vote restriction: Economic evaluations and party support in Germany. Party Politics 23: 286–296. doi:10.1177/1354068815593458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksel, H., and A. Civan. 2013. The impact of economic factors on the 2011 Turkish general election. Boğaziçi Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies 27: 53–67.
   Google Scholar