European Union membership conditionality: the Copenhagen criteria and the quality of democracy

References

• Anastasakis, O. 2008. The EU’s political conditionality in the Western Balkans: Towards a more pragmatic approach. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 8, no. 4: 365–77. doi:10.1080/14683850802556384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. 2018. Patterns of competitive authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. East European Politics 34, no. 3: 337–54. doi:10.1080/21599165.2018.1490272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. 2020. The rise of authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F., and M. Kmezić. 2017. Conclusions. In The crisis of democracy in the Western Balkans. An anatomy of stabilitocracy and the limits of EU democracy promotion, ed. M. Kmezić and F. Bieber, 91–103. Graz: Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group.
   Google Scholar
• BiEPAG. 2017. The crisis of democracy in the Western Balkans. Authoritarianism and EU stabilitocracy. Graz: Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. 2007. Post-communist democracy: The impact of the European Union. Post-Soviet Affairs 23, no. 3: 185–217. doi:10.2747/1060-586X.23.3.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. 2010. The EU and Southeastern Europe: The rise of post-liberal governance. Third World Quarterly 31, no. 1: 69–85. doi:10.1080/01436590903557330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 1979. Commission opinion on the application for accession to the European communities by the Hellenic Republic. http://www.cvce.eu/obj/commission_opinion_on_the_application_for_accession_to_the_european_communities_by_the_hellenic_republic_23_may_1979-en-3f7a93d1-1498-4de4-83ed-edb01558bcec.html.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 2009. Communication from the commission to the European parliament and the council: Kosovo - fulfilling its European perspective. Com(2009) 534 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Delauney, G., 2018. Kosovo’s army dreamers enrage their Serbian neighbours. BBC News, December 14. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46551471.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L.J. 2016. In search of democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L.J., E.C. Green, and W. Gallery. 2016. Measuring democracy. In Search of democracy, ed. L.J. Diamond, 46–75. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L.J., and L. Morlino. 2004. The quality of democracy: An overview. Journal of Democracy 15, no. 4: 20–31. doi:10.1353/jod.2004.0060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L.J., and L. Morlino. 2005. Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Economides, S., and J. Ker-Lindsay. 2015. ‘Pre-accession Europeanization’: The case of Serbia and Kosovo. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53, no. 5: 1027–44. doi:10.1111/jcms.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2020. Democracy index. https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Commission opinion on Montenegro’s application for membership of the European Union: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Enlargement strategy and main challenges 2011–2012. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Montenegro 2013 progress report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014a. Montenegro 2014 progress report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014b. Serbia 2014 progress report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015a. Montenegro 2015 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015b. Serbia 2015 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016a. Montenegro 2016 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016b. Serbia 2016 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018a. A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018b. Montenegro 2018 report. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018c. Serbia 2018 report. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019a. Montenegro 2019 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019b. Serbia 2019 report. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1993. Conclusions of the presidency. European Council in Copenhagen, June 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2018a. European parliament resolution of 29 November 2018 on the 2018 Commission report on Montenegro (2018/2144(ini)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2018b. European parliament resolution of 29 November 2018 on the 2018 Commission report on Serbia (2018/2146(ini)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Assembly. 1961. Report by Willi Birkelbach on the political and institutional aspects of accession to or association with the Community. http://www.cvce.eu/obj/rapport_de_willi_birkelbach_sur_les_aspects_politiques_et_institutionnels_de_l_adhesion_ou_de_l_association_a_la_communaute_19_decembre_1961-fr-2d53201e-09db-43ee-9f80-552812d39c03.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2012. Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Union C 326: 13–45.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2017. Freedom in the World 2017: Montenegro. https://freedomhouse.org/country/montenegro/freedom-world/2017
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2020a. Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2020b. Nations in Transit. https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., and S. Richter. 2010. National identity matters: The limited impact of EU political conditionality in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 2: 263–81. doi:10.1080/13501760903561450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., and O.L. Mathis. 2015. Stability first, development second, democracy third: The European Union’s policy towards the post-conflict Western Balkans, 1991–2010. Europe-Asia Studies 67, no. 6: 916–47. doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1055237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszka, B. 2018. Human rights on the losing end of EU enlargement: The case of Serbia. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56, no. 2: 352–67. doi:10.1111/jcms.12604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović, J. 2016. Tužilaštvo: Uhapšeno 20 ljudi, planirali da uhapse Đukanovića. Vijesti, October 16.
   Google Scholar
• Kapidžić, D. 2020. The rise of illiberal politics in Southeast Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 1–17. doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1709701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatnycky, A., A.J. Motyl, and A. Schnetzer, eds. 2001. Nations in transit, 2001: Civil society, democracy, and markets in East Central Europe and the newly independent states. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kmezić, M., and F. Bieber, eds. 2017. The crisis of democracy in the Western Balkans. An anatomy of stabilitocracy and the limits of EU democracy promotion. Graz: Balkans in Europe Policy Advisory Group.
   Google Scholar
• Komar, O. 2020. The elephant in the room: Illiberal politics in Montenegro. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 61–80. doi:10.1080/14683857.2020.1703495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Toward consolidated democracies. Journal of Democracy 7, no. 2: 14. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2: 235–58. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2006. Normative power Europe reconsidered: Beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 2: 182–99. doi:10.1080/13501760500451600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenov, M., and B. Stahl. 2015. Signaling right and turning left: The response to EU-conditionality in Serbia. In The EU and member state building: Europeanforeign policy in the Western Balkans, ed. S. Keil and Z. Arkan, 122–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noutcheva, G. 2009. Fake, partial and imposed compliance: The limits of the EU’s normative power in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 7: 1065–84. doi:10.1080/13501760903226872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozar, W. 2012. The 100% union: The rise of chapters 23 and 24. https://www.clingendael.org/publication/100-union-rise-chapters-23-and-24.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2017. Montenegro parliamentary elections 2016: OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission final report. Warsaw: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe: Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlović, D. 2020. The political economy behind the gradual demise of democratic institutions in Serbia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 19–39. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1672929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, V., and S. Keil. 2018. The business of state capture in the Western Balkans. Southeastern Europe 42, no. 1: 1–14. doi:10.1163/18763332-04201001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. 2010. Unfinished business: European political conditionality after eastern enlargement. In The European Union and democracy promotion, ed. R. Youngs, 16–37. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 1998. What is democratic consolidation? Journal of Democracy 9, no. 2: 91–107. doi:10.1353/jod.1998.0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2008. EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: Consistency and effectiveness. Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 6: 918–37. doi:10.1080/13501760802196861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., S. Engert, and H. Knobel. 2006. International socialization in Europe: European organizations, political conditionality, and democratic change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 4: 661–79. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C., and T.L. Karl. 1991. What democracy is … And is not. Journal of Democracy 2, no. 3: 75–88. doi:10.1353/jod.1991.0033.
   Google Scholar
• Serbia talks up armed intervention as Kosovo approves new army: Parliament in Pristina backs formation of army despite criticism from NATO. 2018. The Guardian, December 14. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/14/kosovo-to-create-army-in-defiance-of-serbia-and-nato.
   Google Scholar
• Spendzharova, A.B., and M.A. Vachudova. 2012. Catching up? Consolidating liberal democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after EU accession. West European Politics 35, no. 1: 39–58. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.631312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. 2013. Another ‘strategic accession’? The EU and Serbia (2000–2010). Nationalities Papers 41, no. 3: 447–68. doi:10.1080/00905992.2012.743517.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanović, D., 2018. Kosovo’s plan to build an army revives old Balkan tensions. Associated Press, December 12. https://www.apnews.com/2796bc760448419a9b17da21e9029ddf.
   Google Scholar
• Stojarová, V. 2020. Moving towards EU membership and away from liberal democracy. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 221–36. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1709723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N., ed. 2008. Who is a normative foreign policy actor? The European Union and its global partners. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, N. 2013. When the carrot is not sweet enough. Conditionality versus norms as modes of EU influence on Serbia’s foreign policy. Südosteuropäische Hefte 2, no. 1: 77–106. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-360944
   Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M.A. 2005. Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage and integration after communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasovic, A. 2016. Montenegro opposition rejects election outcome due to ‘atmosphere of fear’. Reuters, October 18. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-montenegro-election-protests-idUSKCN12I0UQ?il=0.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, L. 1996. The international dimensions of democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wunsch, N. 2018. EU enlargement and civil society in the Western Balkans: From mobilisation to empowerment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar