The case of Alevis in Turkey: a challenge to liberal multiculturalism

References

• Açikel, F, and K. Ateş. 2011. Ambivalent citizens: The Alevi as the ‘authentic self’ and the ‘stigmatized other’ of Turkish nationalism. European Societies 13 (5): 713–33. 10.1080/14616696.2011.597868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdemir, A. 2014. Alevis and the JDP: From cautious or neutral relations to open conflict. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology 5: 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ateş, K. 2012. Yurttaşlığın kıyısında: ‘Öz Türkler’ ve ‘heretik ötekiler’. Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K, and W. Kymlicka (eds.). 2017. The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardakçı, M, A. Freyberg-Inan, C. Giesel, and O. Leisse. 2017. Religious minorities in Turkey: Alevi, Armenians, and Syriacs and the struggle to desecuritize religious freedom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Borovalı, M, and C. Boyraz. 2014. Turkish secularism and Islam: A difficult dialogue with the Alevis. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (4–5): 479–88. 10.1177/0191453714522476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braude, B, and B. Lewis. 1982. Introduction. In Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society, volume 1, ed.B. Braude and B. Lewis, 1–34. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Castellino, J, and K. Cavanaugh. 2014. Transformations in the Middle East: The importance of the minority question. In Multiculturalism and minority rights in the Arab world, ed.W. Kymlicka and E. Pföstl, 53–73. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 1995. Framework convention for the protection of national minorities and explanatory report. https://rm.coe.int/16800c10cf.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, R. 1982. The Millets as agents of change in the nineteenth century Ottoman Empire. In Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society, volume 1, ed.B. Braude and B. Lewis, 319–37. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dressler, M. 2014. ‘Our Alevi and Kurdish brothers’: Some remarks on nationalism and minority politics in Turkey. In Religious minorities in Kurdistan beyond mainstream, ed.K. Omarkhali, 139–57. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T, and E. Göker. 2000. Alevi politics in contemporary Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 36 (4): 99–118. 10.1080/00263200008701334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, C. 1982. The acid test of Ottomanism: The acceptance of non-Muslims in the late Ottoman bureaucracy. In Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society, volume 1, ed.B. Braude and B. Lewis, 339–68. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Göner, Ö. 2005. The transformation of Alevi collective identity. Cultural Dynamics 17 (2): 107–34. 10.1177/0921374005058582.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, E.S. 2014. Alevis under law: The politics of religious freedom in Turkey. Journal of Religion and Law 29 (3): 416–35. 10.1017/jlr.2014.18.
   Google Scholar
• Issawi, C. 1982. The transformation of the economic position of the Millets in the nineteenth century. In Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society, volume 1, ed.B. Braude and B. Lewis, 261–85. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. 1982. Millets and nationality: The roots of the incongruity of nation and state in the post-Ottoman era. In Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society, volume 1, ed.B. Braude and B. Lewis, 141–69. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kehl-Bodrogi, K. 1997. On the significance of musahiplik among the Alevis of Turkey: The case of the Tahtacı. In Syncretistic religious communities in the Near East, ed.K. Kehl-Bodrogi, B. Kellner-Heinkele, and A. Otter-Beaujean, 119–38. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. 2014. The minority question: A view from history and the Kurdish periphery. In Multiculturalism and minority rights in the Arab world, ed.W. Kymlicka and E. Pföstl, 27–52. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2003. Multicultural states and intercultural citizens. Theory and Research in Education 1 (2): 147–69. 10.1177/1477878503001002001.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2007. Multicultural odysseys: Navigating the new international politics of diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lausanne Peace Treaty. 1923. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/lausanne-peace-treaty-part-i_-political-clauses.en.mfa.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C. 2017. Between Islam and the nation: Nation-building, the ulama and Alevi identity in Turkey. Nations and Nationalism 23 (1): 48–67. 10.1111/nana.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, A, and J. Raz. 1990. National self-determination. The Journal of Philosophy 87 (9): 439–61. 10.2307/2026968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mélikoff, I. 1998. Bektashi/Kızılbaş: Historical bipartition and its consequences. In Alevi identity: Cultural, religious, and social perspectives, ed.T. Olsson, E. Ozdalga, and C. Raudvere, 1–9. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 1995. On nationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oran, B. 2018. Etnik ve dinsel azınlıklar: Tarih, teori, hukuk, Türkiye. Istanbul: Literatür.
   Google Scholar
• Özyürek, E. 2009. The light of the Alevi fire was lit in Germany and then spread to Turkey: A transnational debate on the boundaries of Islam. Turkish Studies 10 (2): 233–53. 10.1080/14683840902864028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkul, D. 2015. Alevi ‘openings’ and politicization of the ‘Alevi issue’ during the AKP rule. Turkish Studies 16 (1): 80–96. 10.1080/14683849.2015.1022722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B, and F. Keyman. 2015. Enacting multi-layered citizenship: Turkey’s Armenians’ struggle for justice and equality. Citizenship Studies 20 (1): 67–83. 10.1080/13621025.2015.1107027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, Ş. 2005. The rise of Alevism as a public religion. Current Sociology 53 (3): 465–85. 10.1177/0011392105051336.
   Google Scholar
• Soner, B.A, and Ş. Toktaş. 2011. Alevis and Alevism in the changing context of Turkish politics: The Justice and Development Party’s Alevi Opening. Turkish Studies 12 (3): 419–34. 10.1080/14683849.2011.604214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suciyan, T. 2016. The Armenians in modern Turkey: Post-genocide society, politics and history. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Tamir, Y. 1991. The right to national self-determination. Social Research 58: 565–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, Y. 1993. Liberal nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1992. Declaration on the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/minorities.aspx
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wpcontent/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yaman, A. 1998. Alevilikte dedeler ocaklar. Istanbul: Ufuk Matbaacılık.
   Google Scholar