‘The law comes first?’: the dynamics of victims’ redress in Bosnia and Herzegovina

References

• Armakolas, I., and M. Maksimovic. 2013. Memory and the uses of wartime past in contemporary Bosnia and Herzegovina: The case of the Bosniak campaign for the October 2013 population census’. http://www2.media.uoa.gr/sas/issues/32_issue/02.html
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, P. 2011. Identities in transition: Challenges for transitional justice in divided societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bajtarević, M. 2019. Abandoned by the state: Bosnia’s wartime torture victims. Balkan Insight, 6 May 2019. https://balkaninsight.com/2019/05/06/abandoned-by-the-state-bosnias-wartime-torture-victims/
   Google Scholar
• Barton Hronešová, J. 2020. The struggle for redress: Victim capital in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Memory Politics and Transitional Justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barton Hronešová, J. 2021. Ethnopopulist denial and crime relativisation in Bosnian Republika Srpska’. East European Politics, January. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21599165.2021.1871896.
   Google Scholar
• Barton Hronešová, J. 2022. ‘Understanding the current warmongering in Bosnia and Herzegovina’. ZOiS Spotlight (blog). Summer 2022. https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/zois-spotlight/understanding-the-current-warmongering-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina.
   Google Scholar
• Bassiouni, M.C., 1994. Final report of the commission of experts established pursuant to SC resolution 780 (1992)’. United Nations. https://goo.gl/ut54hp.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M.H., and J. Kubik. 2014. Introduction. In Twenty years after communism : The politics of memory and commemoration. Bernhard, M. H., Kubik, J., 1–6. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstock, T.I.L.M.A.N. 2006. Legal protection of the missing and their relatives: The example of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Leiden Journal of International Law 19, no. 3: 773–93. doi:10.1017/S0922156506003578.
   Google Scholar
• Bouris, E. (2007). Complex political victims. Kumarian Press
   Google Scholar
• Bursać, D., 2015. ‘Branislav Dukić, između ljiljana i krsta [Branislav Dukić, between Lillies and a Cross]’. BUKA Magazin, 15 April 2015. https://goo.gl/YpYtzt.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. 2006. State-Building in Bosnia: The Limits of “Informal Trusteeship”. International Journal of Peace Studies 11: 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N. 1986. The ideal victim. In From crime policy to victim policy. Reorienting the justice system, ed. E.A. Fattah, 17–30. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J.N. 2017. Rape, sexual violence and transitional justice challenges: Lessons from Bosnia Herzegovina. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, C., J. Guillerot, and L. Magarrell. 2009. Reparation and victim participation. In Reparations for victims of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity: Systems in place and systems in the making, ed. C. Ferstman, M. Goetz, and A. Stephens, 385–414. Leiden: BRILL.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A.P., and J.W. Davis. 2000. Understanding the domestic impact of international norms: A research agenda. International Studies Review 2, no. 1: 65–87. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00184.
   Google Scholar
• De Greiff, P. 2006. Justice and reparations. In The handbook of reparations, ed. P.D. Greiff, 451–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vlaming, F, and K. Clark. 2014. War reparations in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Individual stories and collective interests. In Narratives of justice in and out of the courtroom former Yugoslavia and Beyond, Ed. D. Žarkov and M. Glasius. Vol. 8, 163–85. Heidelberg: Springer. Springer Series in Transitional Justice.
   Google Scholar
• De Waardt, M., and S. Weber. 2019. Beyond victims’ mere presence: An empirical analysis of victim participation in transitional justice in Colombia. Journal of Human Rights Practice 11, no. 1: 209–28. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huz002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbyck, K. 2016. Compensating survivors in criminal proceedings: Perspectives from the field. Sarajevo: TRIAL International Bosnia and Herzegovina.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and M. Diani. 2009. Social movements. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delpla, I. 2014. La justice des gens: Enquêtes dans la Bosnie des nouvelles après-guerres [Justice of the people: Investigation of the new post-war in Bosnia]. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., J.D. McCarthy, and M.N. Zald. 1996. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dragović-Soso, J. 2016. History of a failure: Attempts to create a national truth and reconciliation commission in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1997–2006. International Journal of Transitional Justice 10, no. 2: 292–310. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijw005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druliolle, V. . 2018. The politics of victimhood in post-conflict societies: Comparative and analytical perspectives eds Druliolle, V., Brett, R.L. St. Antony’s Series. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duijzings, G. 2007. Commemorating Srebrenica: Histories of violence and the politics of memory in Eastern Bosnia. In The New Bosnian mosaic identities, memories and moral claims in a post-war society, ed. X. Bougarel, E. Helms, and G. Duijzings, 141–66. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J.L. 2012. Judging victims: Why we stigmatize survivors, and how they reclaim respect. Paperback. Social Problems, Social Constructions. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eric, S., and H.M. Weinstein. 2004. My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erjavec, D., 2019. Žrtve rata i torture BiH zajedno za svoja prava. Radio Slobodna Evropa, 20 October 2019. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/logorasi-tortura-platforma-za-mir-bih/30225374.html
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., G. Mejía Bonifazi, and T. Destrooper. 2021. The meaning of participation in transitional justice: A conceptual proposal for empirical analysis. International Journal of Transitional Justice 15, no. 2: 428–47. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijab013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review I 12 , 68–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gordy, E. 2013. Guilt, responsibility, and denial: The past at stake in post-milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordy, E. 2015. Dayton’s annex 4 constitution at 20: Political stalemate, public dissatisfaction and the rebirth of self-organisation. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15, no. 4: 611–22. doi:10.1080/14683857.2015.1134132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, C. 2020. Patterned payments: Explaining victim group variation in West German reparations policy. International Journal of Transitional Justice 14, no. 2: 381–400. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijaa009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, E. 2013. Innocence and victimhood: Gender, nation, and women’s activism in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, D. 2017. Prayer as history. of witnesses, martyrs, and plural pasts in Post-War Bosnia-Herzegovina. Social Analysis 61, no. 4: 41–54. doi:10.3167/sa.2017.610103.
   Google Scholar
• Hronešová, J. 2016. Might makes right: War-related payments in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10, no. 3: 339–60. doi:10.1080/17502977.2016.1199477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, M. 2012. Victims, civil society and transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Temida 15, no. 1: 59–75. doi:10.2298/TEM1201059H.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowitz, S. 2018. Order of victimhood: Violence, hierarchy and building peace in Northern Ireland. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. 2007. Remembering with a difference: Clashing memories of Bosnian conflict in everyday life. In The new Bosnian mosaic identities, memories and moral claims in a post-war society, ed. X. Bougarel, G. Duijzings, and E. Helms, 193–210. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jouhanneau, C. 2013a. La résistance des témoins: Mémoires de guerre, nationalisme et vie quotidienne en Bosnie-Herzégovine (1992-2010) [The resistance of the witnesses. War memories, nationalism and everyday life in BiH]. Paris: CERI-Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Jouhanneau, C. 2013b. Would-Be guardians of memory: An association of camp inmates of the 1992-5 Bosnian war under ethnographic scrutiny. In History, memory and politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory games, ed. G. Mink and L. Neumayer, 23–38. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Karge, H. 2010. Transnational knowledge into Yugoslav practices? The legacy of the second world war on social welfare policy in Yugoslavia. In Veterans and victims in Eastern Europe during the 20th century. A comparison, ed. K. Boeckh and N. Stegmann, 75–86. Leipzig: Comparativ.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klepal, J. 2018. “The only thing i ‘earned’ in the damned war was PTSD.” Reconsidering veteran sociality and politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18, no. 4: 489–507. doi:10.1080/14683857.2018.1546941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtic, A. 2022. Bosnia’s federation to extend benefits for civilian war victims. Balkan Insight, 2 June 2022. https://balkaninsight.com/2022/06/02/bosnias-federation-to-extend-benefits-for-civilian-war-victims/.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtović, L. 2015. “Who sows hunger, reaps rage”: On protest, indignation and redistributive justice in Post-Dayton Bosnia-Herzegovina. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15, no. 4: 639–59. doi:10.1080/14683857.2015.1126095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, D. 2020. Socioeconomic justice: International intervention and transition in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina LSE International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108871075.
   Google Scholar
• Lakic, M. 2018. Bosnian Serb war victims law praised and criticised. Balkan Insight, 9 May 2018. https://balkaninsight.com/2018/05/09/bosnian-serb-war-victims-law-praised-and-criticised-05-08-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, S. 2011. Surviving the Bosnian genocide: The women of Srebrenica speak. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. 2013. Local understandings and experiences of transitional justice: A review of the Evidence’. The Justice and Security Research Programme. London: LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. 2017. Transitional justice and political economies of survival in post-conflict Northern Uganda. Development and Change 48, no. 2: 286–311. doi:10.1111/dech.12298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, K, and K. McConnachie. 2013. Victims and transitional justice: Voice, agency and blame. Social & Legal Studies 22, no. 4: 489–513. doi:10.1177/0964663913499062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merwe, H.V.D. 2014. Reparations through different lenses. The culture, rights and politics of healing and empowerment after mass atrocities. In Reparation for victims of crimes against humanity: The healing role of reparation, ed. J.-A.M. Wemmers, 143–54. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihajlovic-Trbovc, J. 2014. Public narratives of the past in the framework of transitional justice processes: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Miklos, B., D. Ajdukovic, D. Corkalo, D. Djipa, P. Milin, and H.M. Weinstein. 2004. Attitudes toward justice and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity, ed. H. Weinstein and E. Stover, 183–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milanovic, M. 2006. Narratives of justice for the Balkans: Establishing responsibility for genocide in the Bosnian War. Serbian Yearbook of International Law 2: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, C. 2012. “Who’Ll pay reparations on my soul?” Compensation, social control and social suffering. Social & Legal Studies 21, no. 2: 187–99. doi:10.1177/0964663911433670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettelfield, L.J. 2010. Courting democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague tribunal’s impact in a postwar state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nettelfield, L.J., and S. Wagner. 2013. Srebrenica in the aftermath of Genocide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C.A. 2013. Surmounting the myopic focus on genocide: The case of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Genocide Research 15, no. 1: 21–39. doi:10.1080/14623528.2012.759397.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C.A. 2018. Collective and competitive victimhood as identity in the former Yugoslavia. In Understanding the age of transitional justice: Crimes, Courts, Commissions, and Chronicling ed. Adler, N., eBook: Rutgers University Press. 175–93.
   Google Scholar
• Obradovic, J. 2013. Ethnic conflict and war crimes in the Balkans: The narratives of denial in post-conflict Serbia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Obradovic-Wochnik, J. 2009. Knowledge, acknowledgement and denial in Serbia’s responses to the Srebrenica massacre. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17, no. 1: 61–74. doi:10.1080/14782800902844719.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T.D., L.A. Payne, and A. Reiter. 2010. Transitional justice in balance: Comparing processes, weighing efficacy. Washington D.C: US Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, K., and H. Viehrig. 2011. Issue salience in international politics. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oslobođenje. 2006. Silovane žene na margini zakona [Raped women on the margins of law]. 11 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, V., and P.N. Pham. 2014. Consulting survivors: Evidence from Cambodia, Northern Uganda, and other countries affected by mass violence. In The human rights paradox: Universality and its discontents, ed. S.J. Stern and S. Straus, 107–24. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, P.N., P. Vinck, B. Marchesi, D. Johnson, P.J. Dixon, and K. Sikkink. 2016. Evaluating transitional justice: The role of multi-level mixed methods datasets and the Colombia reparation program for war victims. Transitional Justice Review 1, no. 4: 60–94.
   Google Scholar
• Popić, L., and B. Panjeta. 2010. Compensation, transitional justice and conditional international credit in Bosnia and Herzegovina attempts to reform government payments to victims and veterans of the 1992-1995 war. Sarajevo. https://goo.gl/6crClh.
   Google Scholar
• Popovic, M. 2010. Vodic Kroz Tranzicijsku Pravdu u Bosni i Herzegovini. Sarajevo: UNDP. http://www.mpr.gov.ba/web_dokumenti/Vodic%20kroz%20tranzicijsku%20pravdu%20u%20BiH.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, K.L., and K. Proctor. 2017. Victim’s justice in the aftermath of political violence: Why do countries award reparations? Foreign Policy Analysis. 13(4). 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radio Slobodna Evropa. 2019. Predsjednik Saveza logoraša uhapšen zbog lažnih karata [Chairman of the Union of Camp Inmates Arrested for Falsified Tickets], 16 December 2019. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/30328353.html.
   Google Scholar
• Radisavljević, D., and M. Petrov. 2017. Srebrenica and genocide denial in the former Yugoslavia: What has the ICTY done to address it? In Holocaust and genocide denial. eds. Behrens, P., Terry, N., Jensen, O., London/New York: Routledge. 145–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkin, J., L.J. Nettelfield, M. Matthews, and R. Kosalka. 2014. Bosnia and Herzegovina. Missing persons from the armed conflicts of the 1990s: A stocktaking. Sarajevo: ICMP.
   Google Scholar
• Schwöbel-Patel, C. 2018. The ‘Ideal’Victim of international criminal law. European Journal of International Law 29, no. 3: 703–24. doi:10.1093/ejil/chy056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwöbel-Patel, C. 2021. Marketing global justice: The political economy of international criminal law. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia, A. 2006. Financing reparations programs. In The handbook of reparations, ed. P. de Greiff, 650–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simić, O. 2012. “Pillar of shame”: Civil SOCIETY, UN accountability and genocide in srebrenica. In Transitional justice and civil society in the Balkans, ed. O. Simić and Z. Volčić, 181–200. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S.C., T. Dunning, M. Nazareno, and V. Brusco. 2013. Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. 2021. Holocaust and the meaning of the Srebrenica genocide: A reflection on a controversy. Journal of Genocide Research 1–12. September. doi: 10.1080/14623528.2021.1979294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepanic, A., 2021. Bosnian War’s “Disappeared” remembered with roses. Balkan Insight, 30 August 2021. https://balkaninsight.com/2021/08/30/bosnian-wars-disappeared-remembered-with-roses/.
   Google Scholar
• Vulliamy, Ed. 1994. Seasons in hell: Understanding Bosnia’s war. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, S.E. 2008. To know where he lies: DNA technology and the search for Srebrenica’s missing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldorf, L. 2012. Anticipating the past: Transitional justice and socio-economic wrongs. Social & Legal Studies 21, no. 2: 171–86. doi:10.1177/0964663911435827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M.U. 2016. Transformative reparations? A critical look at a current trend in thinking about gender-just reparations. International Journal of Transitional Justice 10, no. 1: 108–25. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijv029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.A., and R.D. Brown. 2009. Humanitarianism and suffering: The mobilization of empathy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. Poverty and Inequality in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2007-2011. 97643. https://goo.gl/3uvZrA.
   Google Scholar