The ties that don’t bind: trading state debates and role of state capacity in Turkish foreign policy

References

• Acemoglu, D. 2005. Politics and economics in weak and strong states. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, no. 7: 1199–226. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armijo, L.E., and S.N. Katada. 2015. Theorizing the financial statecraft of emerging powers. New Political Economy 20, no. 1: 42–62. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.866082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlı, A. 2011a. Business associations and Turkey’s foreign economic policy: From the ‘Özal Model’ to the AKP period. Bogaziçi Journal 25, no. 2: 171–88.
   Google Scholar
• Atlı, A. 2011b. Businessmen as diplomats: The role of business associations in turkey’s foreign economic policy. Insight Turkey 13, no. 1: 109–28.
   Google Scholar
• Baru, S. 2012. Geo-Economics and Strategy. Survival 54, no. 3: 47–58. doi:10.1080/00396338.2012.690978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D., and T. Xiaoyang. 2012. Economic statecraft in China’s new overseas special economic zones: Soft power, business or resource security? International Affairs 88, no. 4: 799–816. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buğra, A. 1994. State and business in modern Turkey: A comparative study. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çakırözer, U., 2014. AKP’li Bakanın DEİK İsyanı. Cumhuriyet, September 22. http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/koseyazisi/121853/AKP_li_Bakanin_DEiK_isyani.html
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.J. 2002. Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo‐liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26, no. 5: 539–59. doi:10.1093/cje/26.5.539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, M.J.C. 2003. Economic exit, interdependence, and conflict. The Journal of Politics 65, no. 3: 809–32. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C. 2003. Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Review of International Political Economy 10, no. 2: 246–77. doi:10.1080/0969229032000063225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doner, R.F., and B.R. Schneider. 2016. The middle-income trap: More politics than economics. World Politics 68, no. 4: 608–44. doi:10.1017/S0043887116000095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroğlu, A., 2017. Keşke ellerim kırılsaydı. Yeni Şafak, October 26. https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/keske-ellerim-kirilsaydi-2805251
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and S. Gumuscu. 2018. Building a competitive authoritarian regime: State–business relations in the AKP’s Turkey. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 20, no. 4: 349–72. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1385924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, P.B. 1995. Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12, no. 2: 219–45. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göktaş, M., 2018. 6 suspects released in FETO’s business network case. Anadolu Agency, March 30. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/6-suspects-released-in-fetos-business-network-case/1104108
   Google Scholar
• Gowa, J. 1994. Allies, adversaries, and international trade. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, M., ed. 1991. Strong state and economic interest groups, the post-1980 Turkish experience. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, J.A., and A. Prakash. 1997. Strategic trade and investment policies: Implications for the study of international political economy. The World Economy 20, no. 4: 457–76. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S.P. 1993. Why international primacy matters. International Security 17, no. 4: 68–83. doi:10.2307/2539022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürriyet. 2012. Başbakan Erdoğan TUSKON’da konuştu. March 31. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/basbakan-erdogan-tuskonda-konustu-20245708
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet Daily News. 2014. Turkish PM Erdoğan slams top business group head for probe warnings. January 24. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-pm-erdogan-slams-top-business-group-head-for-probe-warnings-61543
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.M., and D.J. Young. 2008. A violent future? Political risk insurance markets and violence forecasts. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52, no. 4: 527–47. doi:10.1177/0022002708316744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoğuz, H.E. 2018. The political dynamics of R&D policy in Turkey: Party differences and executive interference during the AKP period. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 20, no. 4: 388–404. doi:10.1080/19448953.2018.1385928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1973. Transnational relations and world politics. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674593152.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 2011. Power & Interdependence. 4 ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kirişçi, K. 2009. The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: The rise of the trading state. New Perspectives on Turkey 40: 29–56. doi:10.1017/S0896634600005203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirişçi, K., and N. Kaptanoğlu. 2011. The politics of trade and Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies 47, no. 5: 705–24. doi:10.1080/00263206.2011.613226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M. 2012. The political economy of “new Turkish foreign policy’’: A critical appraisal. Uluslararasi Iliskiler 9, no. 35: 101–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M., and H.E. Karaoğuz. 2018. Neo-developmentalist turn in the global political economy? The Turkish case. Turkish Studies 19, no. 2: 289–316. doi:10.1080/14683849.2017.1405727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M., and H.E. Karaoğuz. 2020. Regionalism in the Middle East: Turkish case in perspective. In The Routledge handbook to global political economy, ed. E. Vivares, 569–80. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M. 2021. “Turkey as ‘Trading State’: The High Hopes for Commerce from the Boom Years to the Arab Spring.” In Soft-Power Internationalism (edited by Burcu Baykurt and Victoria de Grazia). New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 108–28.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg C and Georghiou C. (2015). The foreign policy and diplomatic attributes of a developmental state: South Africa as case study. South African Journal of International Affairs, 22(4), 479–495. 10.1080/10220461.2015.1124805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, D., 2016. Do Bureaucracies enhance or constrain policy effectiveness? Evidence from Turkey’s central management of public investment. LEQS Paper No. 109/2016. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E.D., and B.M. Pollins. 2001. The study of interdependence and conflict: Recent advances, open questions, and directions for future research. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45, no. 6: 834–59. doi:10.1177/0022002701045006007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maull, H.W. 2014. Foreign policy: From ‘civilian’ to ‘trading state’? In The Routledge handbook of German politics & culture, Edited By Sarah Colvin, Mark Taplin, 409–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J.S. 1988. Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton N.J: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. 1999. The political economy of international trade. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 91–114. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MÜSİAD 2011. Bölgesel Uyanış, Çerçeve Dergisi, no: 57. Retreived from: https://www.musiad.org.tr/uploads/yayinlar/cerceve-dergileri/pdf/cerceve-57.pdf (accessed 4 August).
   Google Scholar
• MÜSİAD 2018. Ekonomi Raporu: Ekonomik Refah ve Güvenlik Bağlamında Ticaret Diplomasisi (2018 Economy Report, Trade Diplomacy). İstanbul. Retreived from: https://www.musiad.org.tr/uploads/yayinlar/arastirma-raporlari/pdf/ekonomi-raporu-2018.pdf (accessed 4 August).
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 1991. The Logic of the Developmental State. Comparative Politics 24, no. 1: 109–26. doi:10.2307/422204.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and U. Türem. 2002. Entrepreneurs, democracy, and citizenship in Turkey. Comparative Politics 34, no. 4: 439–56. doi:10.2307/4146947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş Z. (2009). Beyond the 2001 financial crisis: The political economy of the new phase of neo-liberal restructuring in Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 409–432. 10.1080/09692290802408642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. 2013. Rising powers in a changing global order: The political economy of Turkey in the age of brics. Third World Quarterly 34, no. 8: 1409–26. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.831541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2019. Turkey under the challenge of state capitalism: The political economy of the late AKP era. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 19, no. 2: 201–25. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1594856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. 2021. The anatomy of Turkey’s New Heterodox crisis: The interplay of domestic politics and global dynamics. Turkish Studies 22, no. 4: 499–529. doi:10.1080/14683849.2020.1833723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, R.N. 1986. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, R. 2000. The rise of the virtual state wealth and power in the coming century. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Saygılı, Ş., C. Cihan, C. Yalçın, and T. Hamsici 2010. Türkiye İmalat Sanayiin İthalat Yapısı. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Çalışma Tebliği No: 10/02.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, G. 2014. Towards a new political economy of development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tür, Ö. 2011. Economic relations with the Middle East under the AKP—trade, business community and reintegration with neighboring zones. Turkish Studies 12, no. 4: 589–602. doi:10.1080/14683849.2011.622515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tür, Ö. 2013. The political economy of Turkish-Syrian relations in the 2000s - the rise and fall of trade, investment and integration. In Turkey-Syria relations: between enmity and amity, ed. R. Hinnebusch and Ö. Tür, 159–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ünay, S. 2010. Economic diplomacy for competitiveness: Globalization and Turkey’s new foreign policy. Perceptions XV, no. 3–4: 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R.H. 2018. The developmental state: Dead or alive? Development and Change 49, no. 2: 518–46. doi:10.1111/dech.12381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yagci, M. 2021. The Turkish variety of state-permeated capitalism and mutually dependent state-business relations. Journal of Contemporary Asia 51, no. 5: 759–81. doi:10.1080/00472336.2021.1887320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksel, A. 2011. Türkiye’de KOBİ’lerin Banka Kredilerine Erişimi. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı. Ankara: Uzmanlık Tezi.
   Google Scholar