State and faith: the supply-side theory of religion and the case of Turkey

references

• Aksoy, O., and D. Gambetta. 2021. The politics behind the veil. European Sociological Review 37, no. 1: 67–88. doi:10.1093/esr/jcaa035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J.O., and B.G. Smith. 2009. The nones: Social characteristic of the religiously unaffiliated. Social Forces 87, no. 3: 1251–63. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, S. 2000. The supply side model of religion: The Nordic and Baltic states. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39, no. 1: 32–46. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakir, R., I. Bozan, and B. Talu. 2004. Imam Hatip Liseleri: Efsaneler ve Gercekler [Imam Hatip Schools: Myths and Truths]. Istanbul: TESEV.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.E., G.C. Layman, J.C. Green, and N.G. Sumaktoyo. 2018. Putting politics first: The impact of politics on American religious and secular orientations. American Journal of Political Science 62, no. 3: 551–65. doi:10.1111/ajps.12365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova, J. 2009. The secular and secularisms. Social Research an International Quarterly 76, no. 4: 1049–66. doi:10.1353/sor.2009.0064.
   Google Scholar
• Cesari, J. 2014. The awakening of Muslim democracy: Religion, democracy, and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cesari, J., and J. Fox. 2016. Institutional relations rather than clashes of civilizations: When and how is religion compatible with democracy? International Political Sociology 10, no. 3: 241–57. doi:10.1093/ips/olw011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çevik, S.B., and R. Friedman. 2022. Turkey’s soldier’s matrix: Fighting against internal threats and external enemies. Politics, Groups, and Identities 1–19. 10.1080/21565503.2022.2119873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves, M., and D.E. Cann. 1992. Religion, pluralism and religious market structure. Rationality and Society 4, no. 3: 272–90. doi:10.1177/1043463192004003003.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, M., P.J. Schraeder, and M. Sprindys. 1994. State regulation of religion and Muslim religious vitality in the industrialized West. The Journal of Politics 56, no. 4: 1087–97. doi:10.2307/2132075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokgezen, M. 2022. Can the state make you more religious? Evidence from Turkish experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 61, no. 2: 349–73. doi:10.1111/jssr.12785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, S.E. 2018. Headed East: Turkey’s education system. Turkish Policy Quarterly 16, no. 4: 47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragunm, R.T., J. Stinespring, and A. Tillman. 2018. Sunday Football or Church? A case study in substitutes and complements. Review of Religious Research 61, no. 2: 169–87. doi:10.1007/s13644-019-00367-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djupe, P.A., J.R. Neiheisel, and K.H. Conger. 2018. Are the politics of the Christian right linked to state rates of the nonreligious? The importance of salient controversy. Political Research Quarterly 71, no. 4: 910–22. doi:10.1177/1065912918771526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, M.D. 2010. Religion, state, and democracy: Analyzing two dimensions of church-state arrangements. Politics and Religion 3, no. 1: 55–80. doi:10.1017/S1755048309990435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, M.D. 2014a. Religion and democratization: Framing religious and political identities in Muslim and catholic societies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, M.D. 2014b. Regime type, religion-state arrangements, and religious markets in the Muslim world. Sociology of Religion 75, no. 3: 367–94. doi:10.1093/socrel/sru034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, P.J. 2020. Identity as dependent variable: How Americans shift their identities to align with their politics. American Journal of Political Science 64, no. 3: 699–716. doi:10.1111/ajps.12496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, C.G. 1995. Rational choice explanations of individual religious behavior: Notes on the problem of social embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34, no. 1: 89–97. doi:10.2307/1386525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 2015. Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of worldwide data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. 2018. An introduction to religion and politics: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., R. Finke, and D.R. Mataic. 2018. New data and measures on societal discrimination and religious minorities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 14, no. 14: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and E. Tabory. 2008. Contemporary evidence regarding the impact of state regulation of religion on religious participation and belief. Sociology of Religion 69, no. 3: 245–71. doi:10.1093/socrel/69.3.245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, P. 2001. Hungary for religion: A supply‐side interpretation of the Hungarian religious revival. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40, no. 2: 251–68. doi:10.1111/0021-8294.00054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, P. 2004. Forced secularization in Soviet Russia: Why an atheistic monopoly failed. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43, no. 1: 35–50. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskins, B., M. Golder, and D. Siegel. 2013. Religious participation and economic conservatism. American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 4: 823–40. doi:10.1111/ajps.12024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorski, P.S., and A. Altinordu. 2008. After secularization. Annual Review of Sociology 34, no. 1: 55–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134740.
   Google Scholar
• Gozaydın, I. 2008. Diyanet and politics. The Muslim World 98, no. 2‐3: 216–27. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.2008.00220.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, B.J., and R. Finke. 2011. The price of freedom denied. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511762345.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A. 2012. Why comparative politics should take religion (more) seriously. Annual Review of Political Science 15, no. 1: 421–42. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-033110-130442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Busse, A. 2019. Religious nationalism and religious influence. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. ed. W.R. Thompson, 1–21, 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.813
   Google Scholar
• Gurses, M. 2018. Anatomy of a civil war: Sociopolitical impacts of the kurdish conflict in Turkey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurses, M., A.B. Celik, and E. Balta. 2020. Civil war and democratization: A micro-level analysis. Social Science Quarterly 101, no. 2: 776–91. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M., and A.E. Ozturk. 2020. Religion and armed conflict: Evidence from the kurdish conflict in Turkey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 59, no. 2: 327–40. doi:10.1111/jssr.12652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hout, M., and C.S. Fischer. 2002. Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review 67, no. 2: 165–90. doi:10.2307/3088891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone, L. 1991. The consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society 3, no. 2: 156–72. doi:10.1177/1043463191003002002.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaya-Stump, A. 2018. The AKP, sectarianism, and the Alevis’ struggle for equal rights in Turkey. National Identities 20, no. 1: 53–67. doi:10.1080/14608944.2016.1244935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, A. 2015. Islamisation of Turkey under the AKP rule: Empowering family, faith and charity. South European Society & Politics 20, no. 1: 47–69. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.979031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirdiş, E. 2022. Education, media and civil society: The building of an Islamic cultural hegemony in Turkey. The International Spectator 1–16. 10.1080/03932729.2022.2140504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koev, D. 2022. The influence of state favoritism on established religions and their competitors. Politics and Religion 16, no. 1: 1–31. doi:10.1017/S1755048322000153.
   Google Scholar
• Kuru, A.T. 2009. Secularism and state policies toward religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815096.
   Google Scholar
• Layman, G.C. 2001. The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layman, G.C., D.E. Campbell, J.C. Greem, and N.G. Sumaktoyo. 2021. Secularism and American political behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 85, no. 1: 79–100. doi:10.1093/poq/nfab011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. 2018. Religious politics in Turkey: From the birth of the republic to the AKP. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukuslu, D. 2016. Creating a pious generation: Youth and education policies of the AKP in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 637–49. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1243332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, M.F. 2022. Reversing the causal arrow: Politics’ INfluence On Religious Choices. Advances in Political Psychology 43, no. S1: 261–90. doi:10.1111/pops.12829.
   Google Scholar
• McCleary, R.M., and R.J. Barro. 2006. Religion and international economy in an international panel. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45, no. 2: 149–75. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00299.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, C.M., and C.R. Gwin. 2004. Religious freedom and the unintended consequences of state religion. Southern Economic Journal 71, no. 1: 103–17. doi:10.1002/j.2325-8012.2004.tb00626.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2014. AKP at the crossroads: Erdoğan’s majoritarian drift. South European Society & Politics 19, no. 2: 155–67. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.920571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir-Sarigil, B., and Z. Sarigil. 2021. Who is Patriarchal? The correlates of patriarchy in Turkey. South European Society & Politics 26, no. 1: 27–53. doi:10.1080/13608746.2021.1924986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özturk, A.E. 2016. Turkey’s diyanet under AKP rule: From protector to imposer of state ideology? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16, no. 4: 619–35. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1233663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, S., and K.E. Corcoran. 2012. Power and the purse: Religious economies theory and urban reform in the Holy Roman empire. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51, no. 4: 757–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01680.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, D.J. 2019. Religious freedom in Islam? Intervening in a culture war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, H.M. 2019. Effect of religious legislation on religious behavior: The Ramadan fast. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 15: 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Saiya, N. 2022. The global politics of Jesus: A Christian case for church-state separation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakallioglu, U.C., and M. Cinar. 2003. Turkey 2002: Kemalism, Islamism, and politics in the light of the February 28 process. The South Atlantic Quarterly 102, no. 2/3: 309–32. doi:10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandal, N.A. 2021a. Religious populist parties, nationalisms, and strategies of competition: The case of the AK party in Turkey. Religion, State & Society 49, no. 3: 248–63. doi:10.1080/09637494.2021.1949216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandal, N.A. 2021b. Solidarity theologies and the (re) definition of ethnoreligious identities: The case of the Alevis of Turkey and Alawites of Syria. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 48, no. 3: 473–91. doi:10.1080/13530194.2019.1651632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, A. 2015. The varieties of religious repression: Why governments restrict religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwadel, P. 2020. The politics of religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 59, no. 1: 180–89. doi:10.1111/jssr.12640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A., and H. Starkey. 2020. Citizenship education in Turkey: From militant-secular to Islamic Nationalism. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, M. 2019. Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1: 42–61. doi:10.1177/0002716218818056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of Faith: explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, R., and L.R. Iannaccone. 1994. A supply side reinterpretation of the ‘Secularization’ of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33, no. 3: 230–52. doi:10.2307/1386688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezcur, G.M., T. Azdarmaki, and M. Bahar. 2006. Religious participation among Muslims: Iranian exceptionalism. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 15, no. 3: 217–32. doi:10.1080/10669920600997035.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, G.M. 1968. The religious ‘Nones’: A neglected category. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 7, no. 2: 219–29. doi:10.2307/1384629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. 1998. Acting ‘As If’: Symbolic politics and social control in Syria. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40, no. 3: 503–23. doi:10.1017/S0010417598001388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M.H. 2020. Nostalgia for the empire: The politics of neo-ottomanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar