Discursive (re)production of social cleavages in the 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary elections

References

• Aasland, A.A., and S. Kropp, eds. 2021. The Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80971-3
   Google Scholar
• Arel, D. 2018. How Ukraine has become more Ukrainian. Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (2–3): 186–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1445460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, K., and M. Shapovalov. 2022. Populism for the ambivalent: Anti-polarization and support for Ukraine’s Sluha Narodu party. Post-Soviet Affairs 38 (6): 460–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2082823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bértoa, F. 2012. Party systems and cleavage structures revisited: A sociological explanation of party system institutionalization in East Central Europe. Party Politics 20 (1): 16–36. doi:10.1177/1354068811436042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortnykov, V. 2007. ““«Розмежування» в Україні в контексті ціннісної ідентифікації населення” [‘Delimitation’ in Ukraine in the context of value identification of the population].” Політичний менеджмент [Political Management Journal] 1: 36–47. Available at https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/bortnykov_rozmezhuvannia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1985. The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theory and Society 14 (6): 723–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyko, D., R. Zaporozhchenko, A. Lytovchenko, O. Nekhaienko, and D. Yashkina. 2021. Group Nominations as an Instrument of Electoral Struggle: Ukrainian Discourse of 2019 Parliamentary Elections. Sociological Studios 2 (19): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2021-02-41-52.
   Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P., and S. Whitefield. 2018. Critical election or frozen cleavages? How voters chose parties in the 2014 Ukrainian parliamentary election. Electoral Studies 56: 158–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dublikash, T., A. Lytovchenko, O. Muradyan, and N. Viacheslav. 2015. ”Радикализм в идеологиях и практиках поддержки интеграционных и дезинтеграционных проектов в разделенных обществах” [Radicalism in the ideologies and practices of supporting integration and disintegration projects in divided societies]. Методология, теория и практика социологического анализа современного общества. [Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publisher. 38–45. http://socio.karazin.ua/resources/346ee9c7c2ec2660a3799cc15a61d6d2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2013. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, A. 2015. Left–right ideology as a dimension of identification and of competition. Journal of Political Ideologies 20 (1): 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2015.991493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Front News Ukraine. 2022. “The Russian language was banned in schools in Mykolaiv.” Accessed 2 February 2023. Front News Ukraine. https://frontnews.eu/en/news/details/33773.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. 2020. “Ukrainians Support Fighting Until Victory.” Gallup. Accessed 1 February 2023. https://news.gallup.com/poll/403133/ukrainians-support-fighting-until-victory.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Guelke, A. 2012. Politics in deeply divided societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guelke, A. 2013. Politics in Deeply Divided Societies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzisavvidou, S. 2020. Studying political disputes: A rhetorical perspective and a case study. Politics 42 (2): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720940883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinich, M., V. Khmelko, M. Klochko, and P.C. Ordeshook. 2008. A Coalition Lost, Then Found: A Spatial Analysis of Ukraine’s 2006 and 2007 Parliamentary Elections. Post-Soviet Affairs 24 (1): 63–96. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.24.1.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation. 2020. National survey “Patriotism, Language and Foreign Policy Priorities – Public Opinion in Ukraine.” Accessed 1 February 2023. https://dif.org.ua/article/%20patriotyzm_mova.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, M., and L. Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1995. Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions. Party Politics 1 (4): 447–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulyk, V. 2011. Language identity, linguistic diversity and political cleavages: Evidence from Ukraine. Nations and Nationalism 17 (3): 627–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00493.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2020. “National survey ‘Confessional structure of the population of Ukraine and the creation of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine.’” Accessed 1 February 2023. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=862&page=1&fbclid=IwAR1TL8EA2ANw0RR2RF-Z7tT6BTX8XmF33hhoxCr_3kGCikgEAHq64jG9J1Q
   Google Scholar
• Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2022. “National survey ‘Dynamics of the population’s attitude to Russia and the emotional background due to the war: The results of a telephone survey.’” Accessed 1 February 2023. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1112.
   Google Scholar
• Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. 2023. “National survey ‘Dynamics of prevalence among the population of ‘split’ narratives: December 2022.” Accessed 1 February 2023. https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1171&page=2.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, K., A. Römmele, and G. Karasimeonov. 1999. Cleavages, parties, and voters: Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, H. 2011. Making constitutions in deeply divided society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793394.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, А. 1969. Consociational Democracy. World Politics 21 (2): 207–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian & Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S., and S. Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litovchenko (Lytovchenko), A., and O. Muradyan. 2014. “Preconditions for Regional Divisions in Ukraine and the Global Implications of the Ukrainian Crisis.” In Uluslararası Politikada Ukrayna Krizi, ed. E.H. Çomak, C. Sancaktar, and Z. Yıldırım, 37–112. Istanbul: BETA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Litovchenko (Lytovchenko), A., and O. Muradyan. 2015. Social and Political Preconditions for Regional Divisions in Ukraine. Sociological Studies of Contemporary Society: Methodology, Theory, Methods 1148: 90–99. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhISD_2015_1148_34_17.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. 1979. Stability in Deeply Divided Societies: Consociationalism versus Control. World Politics 31 (3): 325–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytovchenko, A. 2004. Понятие дискурса в социологическом применении. [The concept of discourse in sociological application]. Методологія, теорія та практика соціологічного аналізу сучасного суспільства. [Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publisher. 137–39. (Accessed October 8 2021)http://sociology.univer.kharkov.ua/images/docs/chtenia/2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lytovchenko, A. 2014. ‘Единая страна’: критико-социологический анализ обоснованности государственной пропаганды. [‘United Country’: A critical-sociological analysis of the validity of state propaganda]. Методология, теория и практика социологического анализа современного общества. [Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Publisher. 150–65. (Accessed October 8 2021). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mtpsa_2014_20_27.
   Google Scholar
• Lytovchenko, A., D. Boiko, D. Yashkina, and J. Holm-Hansen. 2021. “The Discourse of Moderation and Cohesion as an Effective Electoral Tool: Sluha Narodu in Ukraine’s 2019 Parliamentary Campaign.” In The Accommodation of Regional and Ethno-cultural Diversity in Ukraine, ed. A. Aasland and S. Kropp 111–41. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80971-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Lytovchenko, A., and O. Nekhaienko 2018. “Sociologist in a divided society: From diagnostician to propagandist.” Advances of science: Proceedings of articles of the international scientific conference. Czech Republic, KarlovyVary – Ukraine, Kyiv, 28 September. 1506–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355163173_Sociolog_v_razdelennom_obsestve_ot_diagnosta_do_propagandista.
   Google Scholar
• Merkl, P. 1969. Review: Political Cleavages and Party Systems. World Politics 21 (3): 469–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekhaienko, O., D. Boyko, and A. Lytovchenko. 2018. Дискурсивное насилие как инструмент социологической легитимации идеологического порядка разделенного общества. [Discursive Violence as a Tool for Sociological Legitimation of the Ideological Order of a Divided Society]. Социологические студии [Sociological studios] 2 (13): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-37-44.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, E. 1972. Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies: Occasional Papers in International Affairs. American Behavioral Scientist 15 (6): 952–952.
   Google Scholar
• Podolian, O., and V. Romanova. 2018. “Ukraine: The Dynamics of Cross-Cutting Cleavages During Quadruple Transition.” In Crises in the Post-Soviet Space. From the dissolution of the Soviet Union to the conflict in Ukraine, ed.F. Jaitner, T. Olteanu, and T. Spori, 103–20. London: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351234467-6.
   Google Scholar
• Savka, V., and M. Shkoliar. 2018. “Нові ідентичності: реальність плюралістичного суспільства, чи гра на розкол? [New identities: The reality of a pluralistic society or a game of division?] Вісник Львівського університету.” Серія соціологічна [Bulletin of Lviv National University Sociology Series] 12: 53–68. Accessed 8 October 2021. http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/bulletins/index.php/sociology/article/viewFile/10814/10959.
   Google Scholar
• Sokyrka, Y. 2009. Теоретико-методологічні основи аналізу соціополітичного поділу: поняття і види. [Theoretical and methodological foundations of the analysis of socio-political division: concepts and types]. Український науковий журнал -освіта регіону- політологія психологія комунікації. [Ukrainian Scientific Journal “Education of the Region”] 3: 20–24. https://social-science.uu.edu.ua/article/137.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, Y. 2020. Sociological Knowledge in the Concept of Conflict Transformation J. P. Ledaraca. SOCIOPROSTIR: The Interdisciplinary Online Collection of Scientific Works on Sociology and Social Work 10: 21–27. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/socioprostir/article/view/16784/15476.
   Google Scholar
• Sovenko, O., and A. Suprunenko. 2018. “Class and extracurricular consciousness of Ukrainians in the conditions of social division.” East European Scientific Journal 2 (30): 17–24. Accessed 8 October 2021 (in Ukrainian). https://eesa-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/EESA_30_2.pdf#page=17.
   Google Scholar
• Telishevska, S. 2023. “In the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, the use of the Russian language will not be punished, but it remains prohibited.” Вabel. Accessed 2 February 2023. https://babel.ua/en/news/89897-in-the-kyiv-mohyla-academy-the-use-of-the-russian-language-will-not-be-punished-but-it-remains-prohibited.
   Google Scholar
• Tyshchenko, Y., and S. Horobchyshyna. 2010. Громадянське суспільство в Україні та ‘політика ідентичності’ [Civil society in Ukraine and identity politics]. Kyiv: Ukraine Agency Publisher. http://ito.vspu.net/ENK/Inf_Syspilstvo/sam_rob/1Sam_rob_/%D0%A1_6/%D0%A1_6_1/identity2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vozniuk, P. 2015. ““Державна політика злагоди у глибоко розділених суспільствах” [Public policy of harmony in deeply divided societies].” Альманах Молода нація Спецвипуск [Almanac ‘Young Nation’] 53: 352–56. Accessed 8 October 2021. http://old2.niss.gov.ua/content/articles/files/derzh_gromada-289cd.pdf#page=352.
   Google Scholar
• Whitefield, S. 2002. Political cleavages and post-communist politics. Annual Review of Political Science 5 (1): 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112601.144242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaporozhchenko, R. 2021. Sovereigntism as a vocation and profession: Imperial roots, current state, possible prospects. Ideology and Politics Journal 1 (17): 44–71. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2021.01.00003.
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski, J. 2002. Translating Social Cleavages into Party Systems: The Significance of New Democracies. World Politics 54 (2): 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, A. 1975. Political Cleavage: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 231–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008140.
   Google Scholar