References
- Aggestam, L. 2008. Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs 84, no. 1: 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00685.x
- Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 1: 53–80. doi:10.1080/09692299408434268
- Agnew, J. 2004. Geopolitics: Re-Visioning world politics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
- Agnew, J., and S. Corbridge. 2003. Mastering space. London and New York: Routledge.
- Barysch, K., and C. Grant. 2004. Ukraine should not be part of a ‘Great Game’. Open Democracy 7, no. December: 1–3. http://www.opendemocracy.net/content/articles/PDF/2257.pdf
- Bialasiewicz, L. 2011. Europe in the world context: EU geopolitics and the making of European space. Surrey: Ashgate.
- Bialasiewicz, L., S. Elden, and J. Painter. 2005. The constitution of EU territory. Comparative European Politics 3, no. 3: 333–63. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110059
- Bialasiewicz, L., P. Giaccaria, A. Jones, and C. Minca. 2013. Re-Scaling ’EU’rope: EU Macro-Regional fantasies in the mediterranean. European Urban and Regional Studies 20, no. 1: 59–76. doi:10.1177/0969776412463372
- Bigo, D. 2001. “Security(s): Internal and external, the möbius ribbon.” In Identities, Borders, Orders, ed. M. Albert, D. Jacobson, and Y. Lapid, 91–116. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Bilgin, P. 2004. A return to ‘Civilisational Geopolitics’ in the Mediterranean? Changing geopolitical images of the European Union and Turkey in the Post-Cold war era. Geopolitics 9, no. 2: 269–91. doi:10.1080/14650040490442863
- Bilgin, P. 2007. ”Only Strong States Can Survive in Turkey’s Geography”: The uses of “geopolitical truths” in Turkey. Political Geography 26, no. 7: 740–56. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.04.003
- Blake, G. 2000. State limits in the early Twenty-First century: Observations on form and function. Geopolitics 5, no. 1: 1–18. doi:10.1080/14650040008407664
- Bosse, G. 2022. Values, rights, and changing interests: The EU’s response to the war against Ukraine and the responsibility to protect Europeans. Contemporary Security Policy 43, no. 3: 531–46. doi:10.1080/13523260.2022.2099713
- Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, M.A. 2020. The spatial turn, reification and relational epistemologies in ‘knowing about’ security and peace. Cooperation and Conflict 55, no. 4: 421–41. doi:10.1177/0010836720954474
- Campbell, D. 1998. Writing security: United States Foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- The Council. 2023. EU response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Policies. Accessed August 7, 2023. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-response-ukraine-invasion/
- Dalby, S. 1988. Geopolitical discourse: The Soviet Union as other. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 13, no. 4: 415–42. doi:10.1177/030437548801300401
- Dijkink, G. 1996. National identity and geopolitical visions. Maps of pride and pain. London and New York: Routledge.
- European Commission. 2023. Support to people fleeing the war in Ukraine. Employment, Social affairs & Inclusion. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1584&langId=en
- European Council. 2022. Informal meeting of heads of state or government. Versailles. Accessed March 10–11, 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/european-council/2022/03/10-11/
- Füle, Š. 2014a. 2013 ENP package. European commission. Accessed March 31, 2014. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_14_264
- Füle, Š. 2014b. Russian pressure on eastern partnership countries, destabilisation of eastern Ukraine. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_14_331
- Genç, H.D., and N.A.Ş. Öner. 2019. Why not activated? The temporary protection directive and the mystery of temporary protection in the European Union. International Journal of Political Science & Urban Studies 7, no. 1: 1–18. doi:10.14782/ipsus.539105
- Gregory, D., and J. Urry, eds. 1985. Social Relations and Spatial Structures. London: MacMillan Press.
- Härtel, A. 2022. EU candidate status from Ukraine’s perspective. Ukraine’s possible EU accession and its consequences. Accessed July 22, 2022. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/ukraines-possible-eu-accession-and-its-consequences
- Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
- Harvey, D. 1990. Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination 1. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80, no. 3: 418–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00305.x
- Howorth, J. 2017. ‘Stability on the borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s constrained policy towards the eastern neighbourhood. Journal of Common Market Studies 55, no. 1: 121–36. doi:10.1111/jcms.12448
- Huysmans, J. 2000. The European Union and the securitisation of migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38, no. 5: 751–77. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00263
- Hyndman, J. 2012. The geopolitics of migration and mobility. Geopolitics 17, no. 2: 243–55. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.569321
- Kostadinova, V. 2009. The commission, ENP and construction of borders. Geopolitics 14, no. 2: 235–55. doi:10.1080/14650040802693499
- Kramsch, O.T. 2011. Along the borgesian frontier: Excavating the neighbourhood of ‘Wider Europe’. Geopolitics 16, no. 1: 193–210. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.493786
- Kubicek, P. 2005. The European Union and democratization in Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38, no. 2: 269–92. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.03.003
- Kunz, R., and J. Maisenbacher. 2017. Women in the neighbourhood: Reinstating the European Union’s civilising mission on the back of gender equality promotion? European Journal of International Relations 23, no. 1: 122–44. doi:10.1177/1354066115621120
- Kuzio, T. 2003. EU and Ukraine: A turning point in 2004? Occasional Papers ISS 47, no. November 2003: 1–37.
- Kuzio, T. 2017. Ukraine between a constrained EU and assertive Russia. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55, no. 1: 103–20. doi:10.1111/jcms.12447
- Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lefebvre, H. 2009. State, Space, World : Selected essays. Edited by. Neil Brenner and Stuart Elden. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
- Lobjakas, A. 2005. Ukraine: EU commissioner pours cold water on Kyiv’s immediate membership hopes. RFERL: Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty. Accessed February 16, 2005. https://www.rferl.org/a/1057492.html
- Makarychev, A. 2018. Bordering and Identity-Making in Europe after the 2015 Refugee Crisis. Geopolitics 23, no. 4: 747–53. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1499380
- Martín, I. 2022. The war in Ukraine: A migration Crisis like no other. Policy Center for the South. Accessed March 11, 2022. https://www.policycenter.ma/index.php/publications/war-ukraine-migration-crisis-no-other
- Massey, D. 2004. Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler 86, no. 1: 5–18. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x
- Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London and New York: Sage Publications. 10.1002/9781119112297.ch0
- Maurer, H., R.G. Whitman, and N. Wright. 2023. The EU and the invasion of Ukraine: A collective responsibility to act? International Affairs 99, no. 1: 219–38. doi:10.1093/ia/iiac262
- Mc Mahon, M. 2022. Ukraine is one of us and we want them in EU, Ursula von Der Leyen tells Euronews. Euronews. Accessed February 27, 2022. https://www.euronews.com/2022/02/27/ukraine-is-one-of-us-and-we-want-them-in-eu-ursula-von-der-leyen-tells-euronews
- Meister, S. 2022. A Paradigm shift: EU-Russia relations after the war in Ukraine. Carnegie Europe. Accessed November 29, 2022. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2022/11/29/paradigm-shift-eu-russia-relations-after-war-in-ukraine-pub-88476
- Michel, C. [@eucopresident]. 2022. #Ukraine and its people are family. Further concrete support is on its way. [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/eucopresident/status/1497489630865805312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1497489630865805312%7Ctwgr%5E785fae7bf75d2e0f77e21ddbd4abb9643bb00f0f%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2F2022%2F02%2F28%2F1083528087%2Fukraine-european-union
- Molchanov, M.A. 2004. Ukraine and the European Union: A perennial neighbour? Journal of European Integration 26, no. 4: 451–73. doi:10.1080/0703633042000261661
- Neumann, I.B. 1999. “Uses of the other: “The East” in European identity formation.” Borderlines, Vol. 9. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi: 10.17/CBO9781107415324.004
- Nitoiu, C., and M. Sus. 2019. Introduction: The rise of geopolitics in the EU’s approach in its eastern neighbourhood. Geopolitics 24, no. 1: 1–19. doi:10.1080/14650045.2019.1544396
- Orenstein, M.A., and R.D. Kelemen. 2017. Trojan horses in EU foreign policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55, no. 1: 87–102. doi:10.1111/jcms.12441
- O’Rourke, B. 2003. EU: Prodi sets out vision of ‘Ring of Friends,’ closer ties with neighbors. RFERL: Radio Free Europe Radio Libert. Accessed January 31, 2003. https://www.rferl.org/a/1102090.html
- O Tuathail, G., and J. Agnew. 1992. Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography 11, no. 2: 190–204. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(92)90048-X
- Paasi, A. 1995. “The social construction of peripherality: The case of finland and the finnish-Russian border area.” In Competitive European Peripheries, ed. H. Eskelinen and F. Snickars, 235–58. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
- Pace, M. 2008. “The EU as a ‘Force for Good’ in border conflict cases?” In The European Union and border conflicts: The power of integration and association, ed. T. Diez, M. Albert, and S. Stetter, 203–19. Cambridge -: Cambridge University Press.
- Pace, M. 2009. Paradoxes and contradictions in EU democracy promotion in the Mediterranean: The limits of EU normative power. Democratization 16, no. 1: 39–58. doi:10.1080/13510340802575809
- Parfitt, T. 2019. Ukraine approves historic EU deal, Breaking ties with Moscow. The Telegraph. Accessed September 16, 2019. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11100419/Ukraine-approves-historic-EU-deal-breaking-ties-with-Moscow.html
- Penrose, J. 2002. Nations, States and homelands: Territory and territoriality in nationalist thought. Nations and Nationalism 8, no. 3: 277–97. doi:10.1111/1469-8219.00051
- Press Service of the President of Ukraine. 2014. President’s speech at the session of the Verkhovna Rada in the course of the ratification of the association agreement with the EU. Embassy of Ukraine in the republic of Indonesia. Accessed September 17, 2014. https://indonesia.mfa.gov.ua/en/news/27902-vistup-prezidenta-ukrajini-na-zasidanni-verkhovnoji-radi-pid-chas-ratifikaciji-ugodi-pro-asociaciju-z-jes
- Primatarova, A. 2016. “The fifth EU enlargement: Reuniting Europe or reinventing Eastern Europe?” In Exchange, Dialogue, New divisions?: Ethnic groups and political cultures in Eastern Europe, edited by S. Schuler, 145–62. Zürich: LIT Verlag.
- Prodi, R. 2002. A wider Europe-A proximity policy as the key to stability. Speech/02/619. Brussels.
- Sen, S. 2020. On colonial self-perceptions: The European Union, Turkey and the “Bad” leader. Interventions 22, no. 6: 763–82. doi:10.1080/1369801X.2020.1749706
- Siebold, S., J. Chalmers, and P. Blenkinsop. 2022. EU says expects millions of displaced Ukrainians. Reuters. Accessed February 27, 2022. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-says-expects-more-than-7-million-displaced-ukrainians-2022-02-27/
- Simmel, G. 1971. “The stranger.” In Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms: selected writings, edited by D. N. Levine, 143–49. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Sjursen, H. 2002. Why expand?: The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU’s enlargement policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 3: 491–513. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00366
- Sjursen, H. 2008. “Enlargement in perspective: The EU’s quest for identity.” 5. ARENA working papers. Oslo. https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2008/wp08_05.pdf
- Sjursen, H., and K.E. Smith. 2004. “Justifying EU foreign policy: The logics underpinning EU enlargement.” In Rethinking European Union foreign policy, ed. B. Tonra and T. Christiansen, 126–41. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London and New York: Verso.
- Soja, E.W. 1980. The Socio-Spatial Dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70, no. 2: 207–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
- Splidsboel Hansen, F. 2006. The EU and Ukraine: Rhetorical entrapment? European Security 15, no. 2: 115–35. doi:10.1080/09662830600903561
- Tuathail, G.O. 2000. The postmodern geopolitical condition: States, Statecraft, and security at the millennium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, no. 1: 166–78. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00192
- Türkdoğan, S.S. July 2023. Walking a Tightrope: Turkey between the EU and Russia in the Crimea Crisis. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 20(79): 67–86. 10.33458/uidergisi.1325770
- Türkeş-Kılıç, S. 2023. ‘I Thank Greece for being our European shield’: Von Der Leyen Commission’s spatial imaginations during the Turkish-Greek border Crisis in march 2020. Uluslararası İlişkiler 20, no. 77: 109–25. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.1233977
- UNHCR. 2023. Ukraine situation - Global report 2022. Global Focus. Accessed January 1, 2023. https://reporting.unhcr.org/operational/situations/ukraine-situation#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20nearly%20one%20third,Ukraine%20were%20recorded%20across%20Europe
- Urry, J. 1985. “Social relations, Space and time.” In Social relations and spatial structures, edited by D. Gregory and J. Urry, 20–48. London: MacMillan Press.
- US gets a dose of its own medicine. 1999, December 1. Politico. Accessed May 13, 2024. https://www.politico.eu/article/us-gets-a-dose-of-its-own-medicine/.
- Van Houtum, H., and F. Boedeltje. 2011. Questioning the EU’s neighbourhood geopolitics: Introduction to a special section. Geopolitics 16, no. 1: 121–29. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.493779
- Wolczuk, K. 2013. Integration without Europeanisation: Ukraine and its policy towards the European Union. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2344806
- Youngs, R. 2009. ‘A door neither closed nor open’: EU policy towards Ukraine during and since the Orange Revolution. International Politics 46, no. 4: 358–75. doi:10.1057/ip.2009.10