Assessment of four inflow conditions on large-eddy simulation of a gently curved backward-facing step

References

• Wu X. Inflow turbulence generation methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2017;49:23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating A, Piomelli U, Balaras E, et al. A priori and a posteriori tests of inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys Fluids. 2004;16:4696–4712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barri M, El Khoury GK, Andersson HI, et al. Inflow conditions for inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2009;60:227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simens MP, Jiménez J, Hoyas S, et al. A high-resolution code for turbulent boundary layers. J Comput Phys. 2009;228:4218–4231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund TS, Wu X, Squires KD. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J Comput Phys. 1998;140:233–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baba-Ahmadi M, Tabor G. Inlet conditions for LES using mapping and feedback control. Comput Fluids. 2009;38:1299–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araya G, Jansen KE, Castillo L. Inlet condition generation for spatially developing turbulent boundary layers via multiscale similarity. J Turb. 2009;10:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor G, Baba-Ahmadi M. Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: a review. Comput Fluids. 2010;39:553–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock C, Tokyay T, Constantinescu G. A method for characterising the sensitivity of turbulent flow fields to the structure of inlet turbulence. J Turb. 2011;12:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronk FT, Hulshoff SJ. A comparison of inflow generation methods for large-eddy simulation. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatronic Manuf Eng. 2012;6:1600–1605.
   Google Scholar
• Piomelli U, Yuan J. Numerical simulations of spatially developing, accelerating boundary layers. Phys Fluids. 2013;25:101304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrin N, Benhamadouche S, Laurence D, et al. A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2006;27:585–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mare L, Klein M, Jones W, et al. Synthetic turbulence inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys Fluids. 2006;18:025107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L. Using isotropic synthetic fluctuations as inlet boundary conditions for unsteady simulations. Adv Appl Fluid Mech. 2007;1:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Perret L, Delville J, Manceau R, et al. Turbulent inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation based on low-order empirical model. Phys Fluids. 2008;20:075107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Z-T, Castro IP. Efficient generation of inflow conditions for large eddy simulation of street-scale flows. Flow Turb Combust. 2008;81:449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M, Sadiki A, Janicka J. A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. J Comput Phys. 2003;186:652–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamies M, Weiss P-E, Garnier E, et al. Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows. Phys Fluids. 2009;21:045103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoepffner J, Naka Y, Fukagata K. Realizing turbulent statistics. J Fluid Mech. 2011;676:54–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilling L, Sørensen NN. Imposing resolved turbulence in CFD simulations. Wind Energy. 2011;14:661–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Castro IP, Xie Z-T. Divergence-free turbulence inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations with incompressible flow solvers. Comput Fluids. 2013;84:56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa RI. Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comput Phys. 1986;62:40–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana Z, Thornber B, Drikakis D. On the importance of generating accurate turbulent boundary condition for unsteady simulations. J Turb. 2011;12:1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abboud AW, Smith ST. Large eddy simulation of a coaxial jet with a synthetic turbulent inlet. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2014;50:240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzel D, Messig D, Piscaglia F, et al. Evaluation of scale resolving turbulence generation methods for Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent flows. Comput Fluids. 2014;93:116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempf A, Klein M, Janicka J. Efficient generation of initial-and inflow-conditions for transient turbulent flows in arbitrary geometries. Flow Turb Combust. 2005;74:67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore T, Batten W, Bahaj A. Inlet grid-generated turbulence for large-eddy simulations. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn. 2013;27:307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi M, Wang B-C. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow and dispersion over a matrix of wall-mounted cubes. Phys Fluids. 2015;27:115104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloudis I, Yang Z, McGuirk J, et al. Novel implementation and assessment of a digital filter based approach for the generation of LES inlet conditions. Flow Turb Combust. 2007;79:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathey F, Cokljat D, Bertoglio JP, et al. Assessment of the vortex method for large eddy simulation inlet conditions. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn. 2006;6:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aider J-L, Danet A, Lesieur M. Large-eddy simulation applied to study the influence of upstream conditions on the time-dependant and averaged characteristics of a backward-facing step flow. J Turb. 2007;8:1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L. Hybrid LES-RANS: inlet boundary conditions for flows with recirculation. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 55–66. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77815-8_6
   Google Scholar
• Vinuesa R, Schlatter P, Malm J, et al. Direct numerical simulation of the flow around a wall-mounted square cylinder under various inflow conditions. J Turb. 2015;16:555–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuera D, Sekhar S, Mansour NN, et al. PANS simulations of turbulent separated flow over a wall-mounted hump. Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference; 2015 Jun 22–26; Dallas (TX): American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2015. p. 2463.
   Google Scholar
• Rumsey CL. Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on CFD Validation of Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control; 2004 Mar 29–31; Williamsburg (VA): Langley Research Center Workshop; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dhamankar NS, Blaisdell GA, Lyrintzis AS. An overview of turbulent inflow boundary conditions for large Eddy simulations. Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference; 2015 Jun 22–26; Dallas (TX): American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2015. p. 3213.
   Google Scholar
• Arolla SK, Durbin PA. LES of spatially developing turbulent boundary layer over a concave surface. J Turb. 2015;16:81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev. 1963;91:99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly DK. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids A: Fluid Dyn (1989–1993). 1992;4:633–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentaleb Y, Lardeau S, Leschziner MA. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent boundary layer separation from a rounded step. J Turb. 2012;13:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardeau S, Leschziner M. The interaction of round synthetic jets with a turbulent boundary layer separating from a rounded ramp. J Fluid Mech. 2011;683:172–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong S, Zhang S. Further examination of the mechanism of round synthetic jets in delaying turbulent flow separation. Flow Turb Combust. 2013;91:177–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zhong S. Turbulent flow separation control over a two-dimensional ramp using synthetic jets. AIAA J. 2011;49:2637–2649.
   Google Scholar
• Kornev N, Shchukin E, Taranov E, et al. Development and implementation of inflow generator for LES and DNS applications in OpenFOAM. Proceedings of the Open Source CFD International Conference; 2009 Nov 12–13; Barcelona, Spain; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dandois J, Garnier E, Sagaut P. Numerical simulation of active separation control by a synthetic jet. J Fluid Mech. 2007;574:25–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar