Large-eddy simulation of shock-turbulence interaction in supersonic diffuser flows

References

• Matsuo K, Miyazato Y, Kim H. Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows. Prog Aerosp Sci. 1999;35:33–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann EP, Lustwerk F. Supersonic diffusers for wind tunnels. J Appl Mech. 1949;16:195–202.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll BF, Dutton JC. Characteristics of multiple shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions in rectangular ducts. J Propul Power. 1990;6:186–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll BF, Dutton JC. Turbulence phenomena in a multiple normal shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. AIAA J. 1992;30:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Meier G, Szumowski A, Selerowicz W. Self excited oscillations in internal transonic flows. Prog Aerosp Sci. 1990;27:145–200.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman GN, Kim J, Moser RD. A numerical study of turbulent supersonic isothermal-wall channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1995;305:159–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foysi H, Sarkar S, Friedrich R. Compressibility effects and turbulence scalings in supersonic channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 2004;509:207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Foysi H, Friedrich R. Compressible turbulent channel and pipe flows: similarities and differences. J Fluid Mech. 2010;648:155–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Friedrich R. Effects of distributed pressure gradients on the pressure-strain correlations in a supersonic nozzle and diffuser. J Fluid Mech. 2014;742:466–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams NA. Direct simulation of turbulent boundary layer along a compression ramp at M = 3 and Reθ = 1685. J. Fluid Mech. 2000;420:47–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe S, Martin MP. Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave turbulent boundary layer interaction. J Fluid Mech. 2012;699:1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touber E, Sandham N. Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn. 2009;23:79–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirozzoli S, Grasso F. Direct numerical simulation of shockwave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M = 2.25. Phys Fluids. 2006;18:065113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier E, Adams NA, Sagaut P. Large-eddy simulation for compressible flows. Berlin: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pirozzoli S. Numerical methods for high-speed flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech. 2011;43:163–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loginov MS, Adams NA, Zheltovodov AA. Large -eddy simulation of shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction. J Fluid Mech. 2006;565:135–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli M, Schmid P, Hickel S, Adams NA. Analysis of unsteady behaviour in shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 2012;700:16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo S, Raman V. Detailed numerical simulations of a supersonic inlet isolator. In Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena; 22–24 June 2009; Seoul, Korea; 2009. p. 1368–1373.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan B, Lele S. Large-eddy and RANS simulations of a normal shock train in a constant-area isolator. AIAA J. 2012;43:163–194.
   Google Scholar
• Quaatz J, Giglmaier M, Hickel S, et al. Large eddy simulation of a pseudo shock system in a Laval nozzle. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2014;49:108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesterhenn J. A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes. Comput Fluids. 2001;30:37–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lele S. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J Comput Phys. 1992;103:16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson JK. Low-storage Runge–Kutta schemes. J Comput Phys. 1980;35:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni K, Colonius T. Numerical treatment of polar coordinate singularities. J. Comput. Phys. 2000;157:787–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz S, Adams NA, Kleiser L. An approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulation with application to incompressible flows. Phys Fluids. 2001;13:997–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams NA, Leonard A. Deconvolution of subgrid scales for the simulation of shock-turbulence interaction. In: P. Voke, N.D. Sandham, L. Kleiser, editors. Direct and large-eddy simulation III. Dordrecht: Springer; 1999. p. 201.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew J, Lechner R, Foysi H, et al. An explicit filtering method for large eddy simulation of compressible flows. Phys Fluids. 2003; 15:2279–2289.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz S. Large eddy simulation of complex shear flows using an approximate deconvolution model. Zurich: ETH; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Sesterhenn J, Friedrich R. Large-eddy simulation of supersonic turbulent flow in axisymmetric nozzles and diffusers. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:579–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot TJ, Lele SK. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J Comput Phys. 1992;101:104–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar