Development of an intermittency transport equation for modeling bypass, natural and separation-induced transition

References

• Menter FR, Smirnov PE, Liu T, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2015;95:583–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langtry RB, Menter FR. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA Journal. 2009;47:2894–2906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu S, Wang L. RANS modelling of high-speed aerodynamic flow transition with consideration of stability theory. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 2013;58:36–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin PA. Perspectives on the phenomenology and modeling of boundary layer transition. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2017;99:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin PA. Some recent developments in turbulence closure modeling. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2018;55:77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dick E, Kubacki S. Transition models for turbomachinery boundary layer flows: A review. International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power. 2017;2:4–48.
   Google Scholar
• Schubauer GB, Klebanoff PS. (1955). “Contributions on the mechanics of boundary-layer transition,” NACA TN 3489.
   Google Scholar
• Mayle RE, Schulz A. The path to predicting bypass transition. J Turbomach. 1997;119:405–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodefier K, Merci B, De Langhe C, et al. Trnsition modelling with the turbulence model and an intermittency transport equation. Journal of Thermal Science. 2004;13:220–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhawan S, Narasimha R. Some properties of boundary layer during the transition from laminar to turbulent flow motion. J Fluid Mech. 1958;3:418–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driest ER, Blumer CB. Boundary layer transition: freestream turbulence and pressure gradient effects. AIAA Journal. 1963;1(6):1303–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Langtry RB, Likki SR, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables, part 1: model formulation. J Turbomach. 2006b;128:413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suluksna K, Dechaumphai P, Juntasaro E. Correlations for modeling transitional boundary layers under influences of freestream turbulence and pressure gradient. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2009;30:66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Fu S. “Development of an intermittency equation for the modeling of the supersonic/hypersonic boundary layer flow transition,” flow. Turbulence and Combustion. 2011;87:165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin PA. An intermittency model for bypass transition. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2012;36:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge X, Arolla S, Durbin P. A bypass transition model based on the intermittency function. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2014;93:37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. (1993). “Turbulence Modeling for CFD,” DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ge X, Durbin PA. An intermittency model for predicting roughness induced transition. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2015;54:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubacki S, Dick E. An algebraic model for bypass transition in turbomachinery boundary layer flows. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2016a;58:68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters DK, Cokljat D. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of transitional flow. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2008;130, pp. 121401/1–121401-14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. Formulation of the turbulence model revisited. AIAA Journal. 2008;46:2823–2838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubacki S, Dick E. An algebraic intermittency model for bypass, separation-induced and wake-induced transition. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2016b;62:344–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters DK, Leylek JH. A new model for boundary layer transition using a single-point RANS approach. J Turbomach. 2004;126:193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina H, Beechook A, Fadhila H, et al. A novel laminar kinetic energy model for the prediction of pretransitional velocity fluctuations and boundary layer transition. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2018;69:150–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntasaro E, Ngiamsoongnirn K. A new physics-based transition model. Int J Comut Fluid Dyn. 2014;28:204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntasaro E, Narejo AA. A transition model for transitional flow with pressure gradient effects. Engineering Journal. 2017;21:279–304.
   Google Scholar
• Xu JK, Bai JQ, Qiao L, et al. Fully local formulation of a transition closure model for transitional flow simulations. AIAA Journal. 2016;54(10):3015–3023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu JK, Bai JQ, Fu ZY, et al. Parallel compatible transition closure model for high-speed transitional flow. AIAA Journal. 2017;55(9):3040–3050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez M, Walters DK. Prediction of transitional and fully turbulent flow using an alternative to the laminar kinetic energy approach. Journal of Turbulence. 2016;17:253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan KP, Zaki TA. Conditional sampling of transitional boundary layers in pressure gradients. J Fluid Mech. 2013;728:306–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanjalic K, Launder B. (2011). “Modelling Turbulence in Engineering and the Environment: Second-Moment Routes to Closure,” Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin PA, Pettersson-Reif BA. Statistical theory and modeling for turbulent flows. 2nd ed., Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal. 1994;32(8):1598–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe BR, Yaras MI. Transition mechanisms in separation bubbles under low- and elevated-freestream turbulence. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery. 2010;132(1), pp. 011004/1-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Langtry R, Völker S. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2006a;77:277–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki TM, Wissink JG, Rodi W, et al. Direct numerical simulation of transition in a compressor cascade: the influence of free-stream turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2010;665:57–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers DM. (1997). “Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil,” NREL/SR-440-6918, January 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland J. (1993). “ERCOFTAC Classic Database,” http://cfd.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ercoftac, accessed in May 2005.
   Google Scholar