Input–output and life-cycle emissions accounting: applications in the real world

References

• Biaocchi, G., & Minx, J. C. (2010). Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: A global perspective. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(4), 1177–1184. doi:10.1021/es902662h doi: 10.1021/es902662h
   Google Scholar
• Barnaby, F., & Kemp, J. (2007). Too hot to handle? The future of civil nuclear power. Oxford: Oxford Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Scott, K., Lenzen, M., Roelich, K., & Le Quere, C. (2013). Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy, 13, 451–470. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.788858 doi: 10.1080/14693062.2013.788858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., & Scott, K. (2012). Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study. Global Environmental Change, 22, 299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastianoni, S., Pulselli, F. M., & Tiezzi, E. (2004). The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 49, 253–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, P., Cummis, C., Brown, A., Draucker, L., Rich, D., & Lahd, H. (2011). Greenhouse gas protocol product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer, C., Baldock, D., Kretschmer, B., & Polakova, J. (2012). The GHG emissions intensity of bioenergy: Does bioenergy have a role to play in reducing Europe's GHG emissions? London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
   Google Scholar
• BSI (and Defra, DECC and BIS). (2011). PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Chiswick: British Standards Institution. ISBN 978 0 580 71382 8 BSI.
   Google Scholar
• CE Delft/ICF/EcoLogic. (2011). Impact of electric vehicles. Delft: CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change. (2013). Reducing the UK's carbon footprint and managing competitiveness risks. London: Committee on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service. (n.d.). Bill summary & status – 111th Congress (2009–2010) H.R.2454: American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR02454:@@@D&summ2=m&
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. H. (2008). Validation of hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 496–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DECC. (2011). Sectoral uncertainties in the UK GHG inventory. Department for Energy and Climate Change. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120406061036/http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/stats/climate-change/4194-sectoral-uncertainties-in-the-uk-ghg-inventory-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DECC. (2012). Alternative approaches to reporting UK greenhouse gas emissions. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Dones, R., Heck, T., Emmenegger, M. F., & Jungbluth, N. (2005). Lifecycle inventories for the nuclear and natural gas energy systems and examples of uncertainty analysis. International Journal of Lifecycle Assessment, 10, 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Doust, M. (2012, November). Measuring GHG emissions of a city, The Carbon and Environmental Footprinting Conference 2012, British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Droege, S. (2011). Using border measures to address carbon flows. Climate Policy, 11, 1191–1201. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.592671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA Scientific Committee. (2011). Opinion of the EEA Scientific Committee on the environmental impacts of biofuel utilisation in the EU. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/suspend-10-percent-biofuels-target-says-eeas-scientific-advisory-body
   Google Scholar
• Eora. (n.d.). The Eora MRIO Database. Retrieved from http://www.worldmrio.com
   Google Scholar
• EC. (n.d.). Renewable energy. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/targets_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2009a). Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Fuel Quality Directive’). Official Journal of the European Union, L 140/88, 5 June.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2009b). Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Ecodesign Directive for Energy-Related Products’). Official Journal of the European Union, L 1285/10, 31 October.
   Google Scholar
• EC Joint Research Centre. (2012). Product environmental footprint (PEF) guide (Ref. Ares (2012) 873782). Ispra: Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ferng, J. J. (2003). Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics, 46, 121–141. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00104-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French Permanent Representation to the EU. (n.d.). Briefing note: Carbon inclusion mechanism (CIM). Retrieved from http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/euractiv/files/climat%20-%20MIC%20-%20version%20anglaise%20%282%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche, U. R., & Lim, S. (2006). Comparison of greenhouse-gas emissions and abatement cost of nuclear and alternative energy options from a life-cycle perspective. Darmstadt: Öko Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Fthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2007). Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric- and nuclear power: A life-cycle study. Energy Policy, 35, 2549–2557. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.022
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee. (2012). Consumption-based emissions reporting (12th Report of Session 2010–12 Volume I). London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2012). The carbon crunch: How we are getting climate change wrong- and how to fix it. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2011). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Jungbluth, N., Bauer, C., Dones, R., & Frischknecht, R. (2005). Life cycle assessment for emerging technologies: Case studies for photovoltaic and wind power. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 10, 24–34. doi: 10.1065/lca2004.11.181.3
   Google Scholar
• Kartha, S., Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., & Kemp-Benedict, E. 2008. Sweden's leadership in a climate constrained world. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute/EcoEquity.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M. (2006). Structural path analysis of ecosystem networks. Ecological Modelling, 200, 334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., & Crawford, R. (2009). The path exchange method for hybrid LCA. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 8251–8256. doi: 10.1021/es902090z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007). Shared producer and consumer responsibility – theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 61, 27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Wood, R., & Wiedmann, T. (2010). Uncertainty analysis for multi-region input-output models – A case study of the UK's carbon footprint. Economic Systems Research, 22, 43–63. doi:10.1080/09535311003661226 doi: 10.1080/09535311003661226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. (1974). Structure of the world economy: Outline of a simple input–output formulation. American Economic Review, 64, 823–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, G., Hamal, K., & Jonas, M. (2009). How uncertain are estimates of CO2 emissions? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13, 4–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoo, A., Subramanian, A., van der Mensbruggher, D., & He, J. (2009). Reconciling climate change and trade policy (Working Paper No. 189). Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., & Blair, P. (2009). Input–output: Foundations and extensions (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minx, J. C., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G., Lenzen, M., Owen, A., … Ackerman, F. (2009). Input–output analysis and carbon footprinting: An overview of applications. Economic Systems Research, 21, 187–216. doi: 10.1080/09535310903541298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, Y., & Hua, Y. (2011). Motivating stakeholders to deliver change: Tokyo's cap-and-trade program. Building Research & Information, 39, 518–533. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2011.596419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeh, N. A., & Cockerill, T. T. (2008). Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 36, 367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehnt, M. (2006). Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy, 31, 55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P. (2007). Efficient algorithms for life cycle assessment, input–output analysis, and Monte-Carlo analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12, 373–380. doi:10.1065/lca2006.06.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P., Davis, S. J., & Andrew, R. (2012). A synthesis of carbon in international trade. Biogeosciences, 9, 3247–3276. doi:10.5194/bg-9-3247-2012 doi: 10.5194/bg-9-3247-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdue University. (n.d.) GTAP database. Retrieved from https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., … Pennigton, D. W. (2004). Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition and applications. Environment International, 30, 701–720. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpoint/Ecofys. (2012). Assessment of the appropriate uses of bioenergy feedstocks in the UK energy market. Retrieved from http://hmccc.s3.amazonaws.com/DECC-041%20-%20Redpoint%20Energy%20-%20Appropriate%20uses%20of%20bioenergy%20-%20Final%20Report%2009-04-12%20v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2012). UPDATE 2 – EU vote on tar sands oil delayed until 2013. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/20/energy-tar-idUSL6E8FK33620120420
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo. (n.d.). Preparing for a life cycle CO2 measure. London: Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, H. V., Lundie, S., & Peters, G. M. (2009). A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 508–516. doi: 10.1007/s11367-009-0093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsung SDI. (n.d.). Product development through life cycle thinking. Retrieved from http://www.samsungsdi.com/sustain/s3_5_1t.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., … Yu, T.-H. (2008). Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 1238–1240. doi:10.1126/science.1151861 doi: 10.1126/science.1151861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey. Energy Policy, 36, 2950–2963. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spath, P. L., & Mann, M. (2004). Biomass power and conventional fossil fuel systems with and without CO2 sequestration – comparing the energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions and economics (Report No. NREL/TP-510-32575). Golden, CO: US National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, S. (2003). Input–output and hybrid life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 257. doi: 10.1007/BF02978914
   Google Scholar
• Suh, S., & Hupes, G. (2005). Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 687–697. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamiotti, L. (2011). The legal interface between carbon border measures and trade rules. Climate Policy, 11, 1202–1211. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.592672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TFI. (n.d.) 2013 Supplement to 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands: Table of contents. Hayama, Japan: Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/home/docs/1105_WetlandsToC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tokimatsu, K., Kosugi, T., Asami, T., Williams, E., & Kaya, Y. (2006). Evaluation of lifecycle CO2 emissions from the Japanese electric power sector in the 21st century under various nuclear scenarios. Energy Policy, 34, 833–852. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.011
   Google Scholar
• Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2012). Tokyo and trade. Retrieved from http://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.jp/en/climate/cap_and_trade.html
   Google Scholar
• Tremeac, B., & Meunier, F. (2009). Life cycle analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W wind turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2104–2110. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukker, A., & Dietzenbacher, E. (2013). Global multiregional input–output frameworks: An introduction and outlook. Economic Systems Research ( Special issue), 25(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/09535314.2012.761179.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. L. (2008, July). Uncertainties in constructing environmental multi-regional input–output models. International Input–Output Meeting on Managing the Environment, Seville.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69, 211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2013). Policy-relevant applications of environmentally extended MRIO databases – Experiences from the UK. Economic Systems Research, 25, 143–156. doi: 10.1080/09535314.2012.761596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., & Wood, R. (2008). Uncertainty analysis of the UK-MRIO model – Results from a Monte-Carlo analysis of the UK multi-region input–output model (Embedded Emissions Indicator) (Report to the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). York: Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York/Sydney: Centre for Integrated Sustainability Analysis, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Minx, J., Lnzen, M., Guan, D., & Harris, R. (2010). A carbon footprint time series of the UK – Results from a multi-regional input–output model. Economics Systems Research, 22, 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. (2012). WTO legal texts. Geneva: World Trade Organization. Retrieved from http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/legal_e.htm
   Google Scholar