Designing policy for deployment of CCS in industry

References

• Ashworth, P., Boughen, N., Mayhew, M., & Millar, F. (2010). From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 426–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birat, J.-P. (2010). Steel sectoral report. In UNIDO (ed.), Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry: Sectoral assessments. Vienna: UNIDO.
   Google Scholar
• Boot-Handford, M., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., … Fennell, P. S. (2014). Carbon capture and storage update. Energy and Environmental Science, 1, 130–189. doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsting, S., Upham, P., Dütschke, E., Waldhober, M. d. B., Oltra, C., Desbarats, J., … Reiner, D. (2011). Communicating CCS: Applying communications theory to public perceptions of carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 1651–1662. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAN. (2010). Steel, cement & paper – identifying the breakthrough technologies that will lead to dramatic greenhouse gas reductions by 2050. Brussels: Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe.
   Google Scholar
• CCAP. (2013). The new deal – an enlightened industrial policy for the EU through structural EU ETS reform. Brussels: Center for Clean Air Policy – Europe.
   Google Scholar
• CCP. (2010). Oxy-combustion fluid catalytic cracking demonstration – field testing of CO2 capture technology for oil refineries. CO2 Capture Project. Retrieved December 12, 2013, from http://www.co2captureproject.org
   Google Scholar
• de Coninck, H., & Bäckstrand, K. (2011). An international relations perspective on the global politics of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Global Environmental Change, 21, 368–378. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Coninck, H., Stephens, J. C., & Metz, B. (2009). Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy, 37, 2161–2165. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., Reinaud, J., Stephenson, J., Weischer, L., & Wooders, P. (2012). A guide for the concerned: guidance on the elaboration and implementation of border carbon adjustment. ENTWINED Policy Report, Stockholm. Retrieved from www.entwined.ivl.se/
   Google Scholar
• DNV (Det Norske Veritas). (2010). Refineries. In UNIDO (ed.), Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry: Sectoral assessments. Vienna: UNIDO.
   Google Scholar
• Dröge, S. (2009). Tackling leakage in a world of unequal carbon prices. London: Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Ecofys. (2009a). Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EU ETS post 2012 – Sector report for the cement industry. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Ecofys.
   Google Scholar
• Ecofys. (2009b). Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EU ETS post 2012 – Sector report for the chemical industry. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Ecofys.
   Google Scholar
• ECRA. (2012). ECRA CCS Project – Report on Phase III (Technical Report, TR-ECRA-119/2012). Dusseldorf: European Cement Research Assocation.
   Google Scholar
• EEX. (2014). Certified emission reductions – prices and trading volumes. European Energy Exchange. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.eex.com
   Google Scholar
• Enhance Energy Inc. (2013a). The ACTL pipeline project. Retrieved from http://www.enhanceenergy.com/actl
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). NER300 - Moving towards a low carbon economy and boosting innovation, growth and employment across the EU (SWD(2012) 224 final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• GEA (Global Energy Assessment). (2012). Global energy assessment – towards a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Smits, R. E. H. M., & Kuhlmann, S. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C., Graus, W., & Bergen, F. v. (2004). Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs (EEP-02001). Utrecht: Ecofys, TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogwijk, M., Faaij, A., Vries, B. D., & Turkenburg, W. (2009). Exploration of regional and global cost–supply curves of biomass energy from short-rotation crops at abandoned crop land and rest land under four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33, 26–43. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). (2009). Technology roadmap carbon capture and storage. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). (2012a). Energy technology perspectives. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). (2012b). A policy strategy for carbon capture and storage. Paris: OECD/IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IEA/UNIDO. (2011). Technology roadmap carbon dioxide capture and storage in industrial applications. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, J., & Berntsson, T. (2012). Analysing the potential for implementation of CCS within the European pulp and paper industry. Energy, 44, 641–648. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaydjian, F., Zhang, J., Broutin, P., Hetland, J., Xu, S., Poulsen, N. E., … Espie, T. (2011). Preparing the ground for the implementation of a large-scale CCS demonstration in China based on an IGCC-CCS thermal power plant: The China–EU COACH Project. Proceedings of the International Greenhouse Gas Technologies Conference, Energy Procedia, pp. 6021–6028.
   Google Scholar
• Keppo, I., & van der Zwaan, B. (2011). The impact of uncertainty in climate targets and CO2 storage availability on long-term emissions abatement. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 17, 177–191. doi: 10.1007/s10666-011-9283-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kober, T., de Coninck, H., Mikunda, T., & Bazilian, M. (2012). CCS in industry: The case for an undervalued mitigation option (CATO Research Report WP2.3 D09). Retrieved from www.co2-cato.org
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2012). The future of the European refining industry. London: KPMG Global Energy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Reiner, D., & Li, J. (2011). Perceptions of opinion leaders towards CCS demonstration projects in China. Applied Energy, 88, 1873–1885. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, I., Lowe, C., Reddy, S., Bhakta, M., & Balkenede, S. (2009). Designing a climate friendly hydrogen plant. Energy Procedia, 1, 4095–4102. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.217
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Gallagher, K. S. (2010). Catalyzing strategic transformation to a low-carbon economy: A CCS roadmap for China. Energy Policy, 38, 59–74. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Langhelle, O. (2009). Caching the carbon. The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). (2013). Carbon capture and sequestration project database. Retrieved from http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/
   Google Scholar
• MottMacDonald. (2010). Cement. In UNIDO (ed.), Global technology roadmap for CCS in industry sectoral assessments. Vienna: UNIDO. Retrieved from www.unido.org
   Google Scholar
• PBL. (2013). Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2013 report. Utrecht/Petten, The Netherlands: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)/European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC).
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, I., & Whiriskey, K. (2013). Driving CO₂ capture in the EU – new policies, new perspectives. Oslo: Bellona Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Reinaud, J. (2008). Issues behind competitiveness and carbon leakage, focus on heavy industry. Paris: OECD/IEA 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2014). ArcelorMittal says not permanently ditching ULCOS plan. Retrieved from http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/12/06/arcelormittal-france-ulcos-plan-idINDEE8B508O20121206
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century (KSG Working Paper No. RWP04-047). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=617544
   Google Scholar
• Santos, S. (2013). Challenges to the deployment of CCS in the energy intensive industries – Part 1: Iron and steel sector. Cheltenham: IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Straelen, J. v., Geuzebroek, F., Goodchild, N., Protopapas, G., & Mahony, L. (2009). CO2 capture for refineries, a practical approach. Proceedings of International Greenhouse Gas Conference, Energy Procedia, Washington, DC, pp. 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Thrän, D., Seidenberger, T., Zeddies, J., & Offermann, R. (2010). Global biomass potentials – resources, drivers and scenario results. Energy for Sustainable Development, 14, 200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2005). The White Tiger oil field carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Vietnam (NM0167). Project Design Document. Retrieved from https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/pnm/byref/NM0167
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2006). The capture of the CO2 from the liquefied natural gas (LNG) complex and its geological storage in the aquifer located in Malaysia (NM0168). Project Design Document. Retrieved from https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/pnm/byref/NM0168
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2010). Cancun agreements. Bonn: UNFCCC.
   Google Scholar
• World Steel Association. (2012). World steel in figures 2012. Brussels: World Steel Association.
   Google Scholar
• World Steel Association. (2013). Monthly crude steel production in the 65 countries included in the report, in thousands of tonnes (Press Release). Brussels: World Steel Association.
   Google Scholar
• WBCSD. (2013). Sectoral market mechanisms. World Business Council for Sustainable Development/Cement Sustainability Inititative. Retrieved from www.wbcsdcement.org/index.php/key-issues/climate-protection/sectoral-market-mechanisms#1
   Google Scholar
• Zakkour, P., & Cook, G. (2010). High-purity CO2 sources. In UNIDO (ed.), Global technology roadmaps for CCS in industry: Sectoral assessments. Vienna: UNIDO. Retrieved from www.unido.org
   Google Scholar
• Zeman, F., & Lackner, K. (2008). The reduced emission oxygen kiln (A White Paper Report). New York: Cement Sustainability Initiative of the World Business Council on Sustainable Development, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• ZEP (European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants). (2013). CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) in energy-intensive industries – an indispensable route to an EU low-carbon economy. Brussels: European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants.
   Google Scholar
• ZEW. (2013). CO₂ barometer 2013 – Carbon edition the EU emissions trading scheme: Firm behaviour during the crisis. Mannheim and Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) and KfW Bankengruppe.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Dongjie, Z., Linwei, M., West, L., & Weidou, N. (2011). The necessity of and policy suggestions for implementing a limited number of large scale, fully integrated CCS demonstrations in China. Energy Policy, 39, 5347–5355. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zwaan, B., Rösler, H., Kober, T., Aboumahboub, T., Calvin, K., Gernaat, D., … McCollum, D. (2014). A crossmodel comparison of global long-term technology diffusion under a 2 °C climate change target. Climate Change Economics ( forthcoming).
   Google Scholar