2,057
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Muddling through with climate change targets: a multi-level governance perspective on the transport sector

, , , &

References

  • Allison, C., & Saint-Martin, D. (2011). Half a century of ‘muddling’: Are we there yet? Policy and Society, 30, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.001
  • Anderton, K. (2010). The need for integrated institutions and organizations in transport policy: The case for transport and climate change. In M. Givoni & D. Banister (Eds.), Integrated transport: From policy to practice (pp. 55–74). Oxford: Routledge.
  • Bache, I. (2012). Multi-level governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 628–641). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
  • Banister, D., Hickman, R., & Stead, D. (2008). Looking over the horizon: Visioning and backcasting. In A. H. Perrels, V. Himanen, & M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.), Building blocks for sustainable transport: Obstacles, trends, solutions (pp. 25–54). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Banister, D., Schwanen, T., & Anable, J. (2012). Introduction to the special section on theoretical perspectives on climate change mitigation in transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 467–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.004
  • Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53, 1044–1074. doi: 10.2307/2131866
  • Bertolini, L., le Clercq, F., & Straatemeier, T. (2008). Urban transportation planning in transition. Transport Policy, 15, 69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.11.002
  • Betshill, M., & Bulkeley, H. (2006). Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. Global Governance, 12, 141–159.
  • Braybrooke, D., & Lindblom, C. (1963). A strategy of decision. London: The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan.
  • Bromley, D. (1989). Economic interests and institutions. The conceptual foundations of public policy. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
  • Bulkeley, H., & Betshill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14, 42–63. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000310178
  • Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 532–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x
  • CCC. (2012). How local authorities can reduce emissions and manage climate risk. London: Committee on Climate Change.
  • CCC. (2013). Meeting carbon budgets: 2013 Progress Report to Parliament. London: Committee on Climate Change.
  • DEFRA. (2008). Climate Change Bill: Key provisions. London: Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs.
  • DfT. (2009). Low carbon transport: A greener future. A carbon reduction strategy for transport (Vol. Cm 7682). London: Department for Transport.
  • Dror, Y. (1964). Muddling through – ‘science’ or inertia? Public Administration Review, 24, 153–157. doi: 10.2307/973640
  • Durant, R., & Diehl, P. (1989). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 179–205. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00008114
  • ECR. (2011). Edinburgh City Region economic review. Edinburgh: Edinburgh City Region.
  • Forester, J. (1984). Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 44, 23–31. doi: 10.2307/975658
  • GMCCS. (2011). Greater Manchester Climate Change Strategy 2011–2020. Retrieved from http://manchesterismyplanet.com/gmccsip
  • Glasgow City Council. (2008). Metropolitan Vision – our vision for the Glasgow city region 2008–2013. Retrieved from http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=5461
  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. London: Polity Press.
  • Groer, S., & Boltze, M. (2013). Motivations for local climate protection measures in the transport sector. Paper presented at the World Conference on Transport Research, Rio de Janeiro.
  • Gustavsson, E., Elander, I., & Lundmark, M. (2009). Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 59–74. doi: 10.1068/c07109j
  • Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
  • Hickman, R., & Banister, D. (2012). Thinking strategically: Pathways towards low carbon transport. In T. Ryley & L. Chapman (Eds.), Transport and climate change (pp. 341–368). Bingley: Emerald.
  • HMG. (2011). The carbon plan: Delivering our low carbon future. London: Her Majesty Government.
  • Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66, 515–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00612.x
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97, 233–243.
  • Hovi, J., Greaker, M., Hagem, C., & Holtsmark, B. (2012). A credible compliance enforcement system for the climate regime. Climate Policy, 12, 741–754. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2012.692206
  • Howlett, M., & Migone, A. (2011). Charles Lindblom is alive and well and living in punctuated equilibrium land. Policy and Society, 30, 53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.006
  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2009 [2010]). Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the ‘super wicked’ problem of global climate change. Paper presented at the Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions Congress, Copenhagen.
  • Lindblom, C. (1958). Policy analysis. The American Economic Review, 48, 298–312.
  • Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88. doi: 10.2307/973677
  • Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517–526. doi: 10.2307/976178
  • Lustick, I. (1980). Explaining the variable utility of disjointed incrementalism: Four propositions. American Political Science Review, 74, 342–353. doi: 10.2307/1960631
  • MacKinnon, D., Shaw, J., & Docherty, I. (2008). Diverging mobilities? Devolution, transport and policy innovation, current research in urban and regional studies (Vol. 4). Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Marks, G. (1992). Structural policy in the European community. In A. Sbragia (Ed.), Europolitics: institutions and policy making in the ‘New’ European community (pp. 191–225). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
  • Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and and multilevel governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The state of the European Community (Vol. 2): The Maastricht debates and beyond (pp. 391–410). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  • Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18, 501–512. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.006
  • Marsden, G., Kelly, C., & Nellthorp, J. (2009). The likely impacts of target setting and performance rewards in local transport. Transport Policy, 16, 55–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.03.003
  • Marsden, G., Mullen, C., Bartle, I., Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2013). Carbon reduction and travel behaviour: Discourses, disputes and contradictions in governance. Paper presented at the Policy and Politics 2013 Conference, Transforming Policy and Politics: The future of the State in the 21st Century, Bristol.
  • Marsden, G., & Rye, T. (2010). The governance of transport and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.014
  • May, A., & Marsden, G. (2010). Urban transport and mobility (Vol. 5). Leipzig: OECD/ITF.
  • Niemeier, D., Beamish, T., Kendall, A., Grattet, R., London, J., de la Pena, C., & Sze, J. (2012). Characterising the impacts of uncertainty in the policy process: Climate science, policy construction, and local governance decisions. In H. Geerlings, Y. Shiftan, & D. Stead (Eds.), Transition towards sustainable mobiloity: The role of instruments, individuals and institutions (pp. 119–136). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • NRS. (2012). Mid-2010 population estimates for settlements and localities in Scotland. Edinburgh: National Records of Scotland.
  • ONS. (2011). Nomis official labour market statistics. London: Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/
  • Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ryley, T., & Chapman, L. (2012). Transport and climate change issues. Bingley: Emerald.
  • SESTRAN. (2008). SESTRAN Regional Transport Strategy 2008–2023. Retrieved from www.sestran.gov.uk
  • Söderbaum, P. (1982). Positional analysis and public decision making. Journal of Economic Issues, 16, 391–400.
  • Söderbaum, P. (1992). Neoclassical and institutional approaches to development and the environment. Ecological Economics, 5, 127–144. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(92)90042-Q
  • Söderbaum, P. (1993). Values, markets, and environmental policy: An actor-network approach. Journal of Economic Issues, 27, 387–408.
  • SPT. (2008). A catalyst for change: The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland 2008–2021. Retrieved from http://www.spt.co.uk/corporate/about/strategy/regional-transport-strategy/
  • Stead, D. (2008). Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transport Policy, 15, 139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.12.001
  • Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., … Zenghelis, D. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
  • TSG. (2009). Carbon management plan. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government Carbon Management Programme in collaboration with the Carbon Trust.
  • Weiss, A., & Woodhouse, E. (1992). Reframing incrementalism: A constructive response to the critics. Policy Sciences, 25, 255–273. doi: 10.1007/BF00138785

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.