Benefit cost analysis, resilience and climate change

References

• Albuquerque, E. (2013). The New Zealand Transport Agency's transport appraisal framework. Policy Quarterly, 9(4), 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transport Research Part A, 46, 68–78. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A., & Robinson, J. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14, 467–487. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.876342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. (2004). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26, 5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, V., Brown, S., Haeubern, R. A., Hobbs, N. T., Huntly, N. J., Naiman, R. J., … Valone, T. J. (2001). Ecological guidelines for land use and management. In V. H. Dale & R. A. Haeuber (Eds.), Applying ecological principles to land management (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 299–333. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2012). Urban growth and transportation. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 1407–1440. doi: 10.1093/restud/rds010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2005). Machiavellian megaprojects. Antipode, 37, 18–22, cited in Gunder, 2014. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, c ited in Gunder, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockstrom, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557–581. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. (2014). Fantasy in planning organisations and their agency: The promise of being at home in the world. Urban Policy and Research, 32(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2013.835261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., & Peterson, G. D. (2012). Interacting traps: Resilience assessment of pasture management systems in northern Afghanistan. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 312–319. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., Ahisru, O., & Banister, D. (2010). Transport and climate change: Simulating the options of carbon reduction in London. Transport Policy, 17, 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof, B., Heyma, A., & van der Hoorn, T. (2012). Comparing the performance of models for wider economic benefits of transport infrastructure: Results of a Dutch case study. Transportation, 39, 1241–1258. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9383-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–44). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme & World Meteorological Society. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 1(1), 38–52. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Google Scholar
• Laird, J. J., & Mackie, P. J. (2014). Wider economic benefits of transport schemes in remote rural areas. Research in Transportation Economics, 47, 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MfE. (2011). Environmental Stewardship for a Prosperous New Zealand: Briefing for the incoming Minister for the Environment and Minister for Climate Change Issues. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE. (2012). New Zealand's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2010. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE. (2014). New Zealand's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2012. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE. (2015). New Zealand's Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2013. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MoT. (2011). Briefing to the incoming Minister of Transport: Policy challenges and upcoming decisions. Wellington: Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. (2011). Government policy statement on land transport funding 2012/13–2021/22. Wellington: Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Government. (2014). Government policy statement on land transport 2015/16–2024/25. Wellington: Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2014). Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Concepts and results from the DICE-2013R Model and alternative approaches. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1, 273–312. doi: 10.1086/676035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickford, M. (2013). State highway investment in New Zealand: The decline and fall of economic efficiency. Policy Quarterly, 9(3), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Proag, S. L., & Proag, V. (2014). The cost benefit analysis of providing resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 361–368. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00951-4
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, R. (2004). The post-normal science of precaution. Futures, 36, 347–357. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00160-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (2012). Resilience & the city: Change, (dis)order and disaster. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• RTPI. (2014). Transport infrastructure investment: Capturing the wider benefits of investment in transport infrastructure (Policy Paper). London: Royal Town Planning Institute.
   Google Scholar
• SAHA. (2010). Roads of national significance: Economic assessment review. Wellington: SAHA International Ltd & New Zealand Transport Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, cited in Davoudi 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. (2012). ‘Reframing’ resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 308–312. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, F., Weaver, C., & Grambsch, A. (2014). Challenges in applying the paradigm of welfare economics to climate change. Journal of Benefit Cost Analysis, 5, 347–376.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Anderies, J., Kinzig, A. P., & Ryan, P. (2006). Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: Introduction to the special issue. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 12. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzig, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. H., Abel, N., Anderies, J. M., & Ryan, P. (2009). Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art12/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, I., Wignall, D., & Parker, C. (2012). The implications of road investment (Report No. 507). Wellington: New Zealand Transport Agency.
   Google Scholar
• White, I., & O'Hare, P. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 934–950. doi:10.1068/c12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerbe, R. O., & Dively, D. D. (1994). Benefit–cost analysis: In theory and practice. New York, NY: HaperCollins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar