What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies

References

• Adaman, F., Karalı, N., Kumbaroğlu, G., Or, İ., Özkaynak, B., & Zenginobuz, Ü. (2011). What determines urban households’ willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: A contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy, 39, 689–698. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akter, S., & Bennett, J. (2011). Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia. Climatic Change, 109, 417–436. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0034-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akter, S., Bennett, J., & Ward, M. B. (2012). Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: Evidence from an Australian choice experiment. Global Environmental Change, 22, 736–745. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alló, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2014). The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 563–574. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdur, D., Rabe, B. G., & Borick, C. (2014). Public views on a carbon tax depend on the proposed use of revenues. Issue in Energy and Environmental Policy, 13. Retrieved from http://closup.umich.edu/issues-in-energy-and-environmental-policy/13/public-views-on-a-carbon-tax-depend-on-the-proposed-use-of-revenue/
   Google Scholar
• Attari, S. Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C. I., DeKay, M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dawes, R., & Small, M. J. (2009). Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecological Economics, 68, 1701–1710. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2, 600–603. doi:10.1038/nclimate1532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. C., & Bearce, D. H. (2013). End-times theology, the shadow of the future, and public resistance to addressing global climate change. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 267–279. doi:10.1177/1065912912442243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, M. M., & Scheve, K. F. (2013). Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 110, 13763–13768. doi:10.1073/pnas.1306374110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., & Gampfer, R. (2013). Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 23, 439–449. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Leeper, T. J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2013). Doing what others do: Norms, science, and collective action on global warming. American Politics Research, 42, 65–89. doi:10.1177/1532673X13484173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–218. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, N., & Lanz, B. (2008). Voting on the environment: Price or ideology? Evidence from Swiss referendums. Ecological Economics, 67, 430–440. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., O'Connor, R. E., Böhm, G., Hanss, D., Bodi, O., Ekström, F., … Sælensminde, I. (2012). Causal thinking and support for climate change policies: International survey findings. Global Environmental Change, 22, 210–222. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannlund, R., & Persson, L. (2012). To tax, or not to tax: Preferences for climate policy attributes. Climate Policy, 12, 704–721. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.675732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2010). Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69, 1824–1837. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., Brander, L., & Van Beukering, P. (2008). ‘A convenient truth’: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Climatic Change, 90, 299–313. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9414-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29–40. doi:10.1177/106591290305600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, B., Cameron, T. A., & Gerdes, G. R. (2010). Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in climate change policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 429–458. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9348-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century: International trends in public perceptions of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 35–61. doi:10.1002/wcc.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, S. B., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., Krupnick, A., Lampi, E., Löfgren, Å., Qin, P., … Sterner, T. (2012). Paying for mitigation: A multiple country study. Land Economics, 88, 326–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., Louviere, J. J., & Wei, E. (2010). Alternative Australian climate change plans: The public's views. Energy Policy, 38, 902–911. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2012). The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation. Environmental Science & Policy, 16, 90–96. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, A., Markowitz, E., & Pidgeon, N. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 411–422. doi:10.1002/wcc.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBono, R., Vincenti, K., & Calleja, N. (2012). Risk communication: climate change as a human-health threat, a survey of public perceptions in Malta. European Journal of Public Health, 22, 144–149. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Schuitema, G. (2012). How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 19–20, 100–107. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, J., & Goeschl, T. (2014). Willingness to pay for voluntary climate action and its determinants: Field-experimental evidence. Environmental Resource Economics, 57, 405–429. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9686-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472. doi:10.1177/1043463103154002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Dan, A. (2009). How deliberation affects stated willingness to pay for mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions: An experiment. Land Economics, 85, 329–347. doi:10.3368/le.85.2.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1, 462–466. doi:10.1038/nclimate1295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, S., Dunne, L., Clinch, P., & Beuermann, C. (2006). Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy, 34, 895–904. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S. J., & Walker, I. (2013). Acceptance and support of the Australian carbon policy. Social Justice Research, 26, 343–362. doi:10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J., & Jonsson, L. (2011). The unexpected ‘yes’: Explanatory factors behind the positive attitudes to congestion charges in Stockholm. Transport Policy, 18, 636–647. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42, 1117–1128. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., Peters, V., Vávra, J., Neebe, M., & Megyesi, B. (2011). Energy use, climate change and folk psychology: Does sustainability have a chance? Results from a qualitative study in five European countries. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1025–1034. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1001–1008. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampfer, R. (2014). Do individuals care about fairness in burden sharing for climate change mitigation? Evidence from a lab experiment. Climatic Change, 124, 65–77. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1091-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2013). The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67–95. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2012.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Gelissen, J. (2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection a multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39, 392–415. doi:10.1177/0013916506292014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbheer, D., Niggli, S., & Schmutzler, A. (2006). What does it take to sell environmental policy? An empirical analysis of referendum data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 441–462. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-4993-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate Policy, 5, 613–625. doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2007). What is a fair CO2 tax increase? On fair emission reductions in the transport sector. Ecological Economics, 61, 377–387. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). A dirty word or a dirty world?: Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86–92. doi:10.1177/0956797609355572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harring, N., & Jagers, S. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5, 210–227. doi:10.3390/su5010210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33, 28–51. doi:10.1177/1075547010366400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2009). Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of the day after tomorrow. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3, 355–366. doi:10.1080/17524030903265823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701–723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Li, Z. (2013). Referendum voting in road pricing reform: A review of the evidence. Transport Policy, 25, 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, J., & Viscusi, W. K. (2006). The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence. Climatic Change, 77, 121–136. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9074-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.-L., Walters, J., & Purgas, A. (2008). Pollution tax heuristics: An empirical study of willingness to pay higher gasoline taxes. Energy Policy, 36, 3612–3619. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 525–531. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28, 57–72. doi:10.2307/420583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Hammar, H. (2009). Environmental taxation for good and for bad: the efficiency and legitimacy of Sweden's carbon tax. Environmental Politics, 18, 218–237. doi:10.1080/09644010802682601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. M. (2013). Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: Ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Nemet, G. F. (2010). Willingness to pay for climate policy: A review of estimates (Working Paper Series). Madison, WI: La Follette School.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D., Sherman, S. J., & Varian, H. R. (2000). Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. In Elicitation of Preferences (pp. 203–242). Norwell, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Aasen, M. (2010). The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecological Economics, 69, 2183–2190. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., Kroll, S., & Cherry, T. L. (2011). Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39, 2966–2973. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Schmöcker, J.-D., Fujii, S., & Noland, R. B. (2013). Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S., Dowlatabadi, H., & McDaniels, T. (2012). Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas. Global Environmental Change, 22, 862–876. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., Boyle, K. J., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 55, 617–625. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77, 7–43. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9068-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–260. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & MacInnis, B. (2013). Does the American public support legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Daedalus, 142, 26–39. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. (2012). Public attitudes toward climate science and climate policy in federal systems: Canada and the United States compared. Review of Policy Research, 29, 334–357. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4, 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, S.-P. (2014). Predicting support of climate policies by using a protection motivation model. Climate Policy, 15, 321–338. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.916599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., & Cameron, T. A. (2008). Popular support for climate change mitigation: Evidence from a general population mail survey. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41, 223–248. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9189-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Marlon, J., & Howe, P. (2013). Public support for climate and energy policies in April 2013. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A. Y., Alexander, K. S., Proctor, W., & Ryan, A. (2013). Reciprocity as deliberative capacity: Lessons from a citizen's deliberation on carbon pricing mechanisms in Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 444–459. doi: 10.1068/c11192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2011). Does the framing of climate policies make a difference to public support? Evidence from UK marginal constituencies. Climate Policy, 11, 1097–1112. doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.579301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, Å., & Nordblom, K. (2010). Attitudes towards CO2 taxation – is there an Al Gore effect? Applied Economics Letters, 17, 845–848. doi:10.1080/13504850802584849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, A., Hoyos, D., & Markandya, A. (2012). Willingness to pay for ancillary benefits of climate change mitigation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51, 119–140. doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9491-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior, 29, 391–413. doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE, 6, e17571. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M. (2008). Social bases of climate change knowledge, concern, and policy support in the U.S. general public. Hofstra Law Review 37(4), 1017–1046.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013a). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119, 511–518. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013b). Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006–12. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6, 194–201. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00058.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., Duncan, R., & Parton, K. A. (2013). Targeting segments in the Australian community to increase support for climate change policy. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21, 212–217. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M., & Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2011). The success and failure of an inconvenient truth and the Stern report in influencing Australian public support for greenhouse policy. Economic Record, 87, 269–281. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2010.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., & Biel, A. (2008). Acceptance of climate change policy measures: Role framing and value guidance. European Environment, 18, 203–215. doi:10.1002/eet.477
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., von Borgstede, C., & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., Yarnal, B., & Wiefek, N. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1–17. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A. L., Conover, E., Videras, J., & Wu, S. (2012). Heat waves, droughts, and preferences for environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 556–577. doi:10.1002/pam.21599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. The American Political Science Review, 77, 175–190. doi: 10.2307/1956018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., Capstick, S., & Poortinga, W. (2011). Policy attribute framing: A comparison between three policy instruments for personal emissions reduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 889–905. doi:10.1002/pam.20610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. S., & Vedlitz, A. (2013). Climate hazards and risk status: Explaining climate risk assessment, behavior, and policy support. Sociological Spectrum, 33, 219–239. doi:10.1080/02732173.2013.732900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patt, A. G., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 219–232. doi:10.1002/wcc.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovic, N., Madrigano, J., & Zaval, L. (2014). Motivating mitigation: When health matters more than climate change. Climatic Change, 126, 245–254. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1192-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosentrater, L. D., Sælensminde, I., Ekström, F., Böhm, G., Bostrom, A., Hanss, D., & O'Connor, R. E. (2013). Efficacy trade-offs in individuals’ support for climate change policies. Environment and Behavior, 45, 935–970. doi:10.1177/0013916512450510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., & Spash, C. L. (2011). Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 674–687. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi, S., Riva, P., Brambilla, M., & Grasso, M. (2014). Moral reasoning and climate change mitigation: The deontological reaction toward the market-based approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 252–261. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sælen, H., & Kallbekken, S. (2011). A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. Ecological Economics, 70, 2181–2190. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Rothengatter, J. A. (2010). The acceptability, personal outcome expectations, and expected effects of transport pricing policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 587–593. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22, 505–515. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwom, R., Bidwell, D., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2010). Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environmental Change, 20, 472–482. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwom, R., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2008). The effects of information and state of residence on climate change policy preferences. Climatic Change, 90, 343–358. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9428-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Kurz, T. (2013). A model of climate belief profiles: How much does it matter if people question human causation? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 245–261. doi:10.1111/asap.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013a). American evangelicals and global warming. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1009–1017. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013b). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34, 937–948. doi:10.1111/risa.12140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2011). Citizens as veto players: Climate change policy and the constraints of direct democracy. Environmental Politics, 20, 485–507. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.589577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415–425. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2006). Why are energy policies acceptable and effective? Environment and Behavior, 38, 92–111. doi:10.1177/0013916505278519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value–belief–norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann, S., O'Riordan, T., & Jaeger, C. C. (2001). The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: Evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change, 11, 107–117. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00061-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough, J. W., Liu, X., & Vedlitz, A. (2014). Trends in public attitudes toward climate change: The influence of the economy and Climategate on risk, information, and public policy. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 5, 22–37. doi:10.1002/rhc3.12045
   Google Scholar
• Stoutenborough, J. W., & Vedlitz, A. (2013). The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundblad, E.-L., Biel, A., & Gärling, T. (2014). Intention to change activities that reduce carbon dioxide emissions related to worry about global climate change consequences. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 64, 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2011.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmann, P. (2004). The public acceptance of green taxes: 2 million voters express their opinion. Public Choice, 119, 179–217. doi:10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024165.18082.db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics, 65, 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar, A., & Krosnick, J. A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change, 105, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9882-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2006). The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: A rational and behavioral blend. Climatic Change, 77, 151–177. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9075-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J., Edwards, T., & Luckins, K. (2013). Post carbon pathways: A meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8, 76–93. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. J., Rickard, L. N., Harrison, T. M., & Seo, M. (2014). Applying the risk information seeking and processing model to examine support for climate change mitigation policy. Science Communication, 36, 296–324. doi:10.1177/1075547014525350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarnal, B., O'Connor, R. E., & Shudak, R. (2003). The impact of local versus national framing on willingness to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: A case study from central Pennsylvania. Local Environment, 8, 457–469. doi:10.1080/13549830306668
   Google Scholar
• Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 771–789. doi:10.1080/08941920600835528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2011). Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. Journal of Communication, 61, 713–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar