573
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH

US institutional pathways to clean coal and shale gas: lessons for China

&

References

  • Baker Hughes. (2014). Rig count. Houston, TX: Baker Hughes. Retrieved from http://www.bakerhughes.com/rig-count
  • Credit Suisse. (2012). The shale revolution. New York, NY: Credit Suisse.
  • Dai, Y., & Xue, L. (2014). China's policy initiatives for the development of wind energy technology. Climate Policy, 15, 30–57. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.863549
  • Deloitte. (2014). Consulting. Retrieved from http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Services/consulting/4470cda5e0820310VgnVCM1000001a56f00aRCRD.htm#
  • DOE, & EPA. (2010). Report of the interagency task force on carbon capture and storage. Washington, DC: The White House.
  • Drahos, P. (2009). The China–US relationship on climate change, intellectual property and CCS: Requiem for a species? The WIPO Journal: Analysis and Debate on Intellectual Property Issues, 1, 125–132.
  • EIA. (1993). Drilling sideways: A review of horizontal well technology and its domestic application. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
  • EIA. (2013). Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
  • EIA. (2014). Annual energy outlook 2014. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
  • EIA. (2015). Total energy. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/
  • EPA. (2013). Proposed carbon pollution standards for new power plants (20 September, 2013). Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Everett, R. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Folger, P. (2014). Carbon capture and sequestration: Research, development and demonstration at the U.S. Department of Energy. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
  • Gallagher, K. S., Grübler, A., Kuhl, L., Nemet, G., & Wilson, C. (2012). The energy technology innovation system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 137–162. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915
  • Gallagher, K. S., Holdren, J. P., & Sagar, A. D. (2006). Energy-technology innovation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 193–237. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144321
  • GAO. (2009). Clean coal: DOE's decision to restructure Futuregen should be based on a comprehensive analysis of costs, benefits, and risks. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office.
  • Geman, B. (2015). RIP futuregen: Energy department kills troubled bush-era coal electricity project. National journal. Retrieved from http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/rip-futuregen-energy-department-kills-troubled-bush-era-coal-electricity-project-20150203
  • Global CCS Institute. (2014). The global status of CCS. Melbourne: Global CCS Institute.
  • Gold, R. (2014). The boom: How fracking ignited the American energy revolution and changed the world. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Gross, D. (2014). The war on coal in the American midwest. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/08/war_on_coal_in_the_american_midwest_nrg_is_ramping_down_its_reliance_on.html
  • Gunningham, N. (2013). A shale gas revolution for China? Climate Policy, 14, 302–320. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.842857
  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Haszeldine, R. S. (2009). Carbon capture and storage: How green can black be? Science, 325, 1647–1652. doi:10.1126/science.1172246
  • Hefner, R. (2014). The United States of gas: Why the shale revolution could have only happened in America. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 9–14.
  • Hinton, D. D. (2012). The seventeen-year overnight wonder: George Mitchell and unlocking the Barnett Shale. Journal of American History, 99(1), 229–235. doi:10.1093/jahist/jas064
  • Huang, Y. (2008). Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hughes, J. D. (2013). Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution. Nature, 494, 307–308. doi: 10.1038/494307a
  • IEA. (2009). Cleaner coal in China. Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • IEA. (2011). Are we entering a golden age of gas? (Special Report). Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • IEA. (2013a). Technology roadmap: Carbon capture and storage. Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • IEA. (2013b). World energy outlook 2013. Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • IEA. (2014). Energy technology perspectives 2014. Paris: International Energy Agency.
  • IPAA. (2013). Profile of independent producers | 2012–2013. Washington, DC: Independent Petroleum Association of America.
  • Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy, 28, 625–640. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0
  • Kagan, R. A. (1991). Adversarial legalism and American government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 369–406. doi:10.2307/3325322
  • Lelong, C., Currie, J., Dart, S., & Koenig, P. (2013). The window for thermal coal investment is closing. New York, NY: Goldman Sachs.
  • MIT. (2014). CCS project database @ MIT. Retrieved from https://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/plant_barry.html
  • MIT. (2015). CCS project database @ MIT. Retrieved from http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kemper.html
  • Morse, E. (2014). Welcome to the revolution: Why shale is the next shale. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 3–7.
  • Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1999). Paths of innovation: Technological change in 20th century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. doi:10.2307/1942704
  • NRC (National Research Council). (2001). Energy research at DOE: Was it worth it? Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Pi, G., Dong, X., Dong, C., Guo, J., & Ma, Z. (2015). The status, obstacles and policy recommendations of shale gas development in China. Sustainability, 7, 2353–2372. doi: 10.3390/su7032353
  • Pollak, M., Phillips, S. J., & Vajjhala, S. (2011). Carbon capture and storage policy in the United States: A new coalition endeavors to change existing policy. Global Environmental Change, 21, 313–323. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.009
  • Rahm, D. (2011). Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas. Energy Policy, 39, 2974–2981. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.009
  • Román, M. (2011). Carbon capture and storage in developing countries: A comparison of Brazil, South Africa and India. Global Environmental Change, 21, 391–401. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.018
  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
  • Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2013). Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Climate Change, 3, 105–111. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1695
  • Sovacool, B. K. (2014). Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 249–264. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068
  • Spence, D. B. (2013). Federalism, regulatory lags, and the political economy of energy production. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161, 431–508.
  • Stephens, J. (2009). Technology leader, policy laggard: CCS development for climate mitigation in the U.S. political context. In J. Meadowcroft & O. Langhelle (Eds.), Caching the carbon: The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage (pp. 22–49). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Stephens, J. C., & Jiusto, S. (2010). Assessing innovation in emerging energy technologies: Socio-technical dynamics of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in the USA. Energy Policy, 38, 2020–2031. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.003
  • The Economist. (2014, August 30). Shale game: China drastically reduces its ambitions to be a big shale-gas producer. The Economist.
  • The White House. (2014). U.S.-China joint announcement on climate change. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change
  • Thomson, E. (2014). Introduction to special issue: Energy issues in China's 12th Five Year Plan and beyond. Energy Policy, 73, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.038
  • Tollefson, J. (2013). China slow to tap shale-gas bonanza. Nature, 494, 294. doi:10.1038/494294a
  • Wan, Z., Huang, T., & Craig, B. (2014). Barriers to the development of China's shale gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 818–823. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.073
  • Wilson, E., Zhang, D., & Zheng, L. (2011). The socio-political context for deploying carbon capture and storage in China and the U.S. Global Environmental Change, 21, 324–335. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.012
  • Wu, K. (2014). China's energy security: Oil and gas. Energy Policy, 73, 4–11. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.040
  • Yu, P. (2005). Still dissatisfied after all these years: Intellectual property, post-WTO China, and the avoidable cycle of futility. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 34(1), 143–158.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.