Understanding carbon trading: Effects of delegating CO₂ responsibility on organizations’ trading behaviour

References

• Benz, E. V. A., Löschel, A., & Sturm, B. (2010). Auctioning of CO2 emission allowances in Phase 3 of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Climate Policy, 10, 705–718. doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, R., & Sato, M. (2006). Emissions trading: Lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. Climate Policy, 26, 351–359. doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685607
   Google Scholar
• Betz, R. A., & Schmidt, T. S. (2015). Transfer patterns in Phase I of the EU Emissions Trading System: A first reality check based on cluster analysis. Climate Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1028319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clò, S. (2009). The effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Climate Policy, 9, 227–241. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dales, J. H. (1968). Pollution property and prices: An essay in policy-making and economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirix, J., Peeters, W., Eyckmans, J., Jones, P. T., & Sterckx, S. (2013). Strengthening bottom-up and top-down climate governance. Climate Policy, 13, 363–383. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.752664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. D., Convery, F. H., & de Perthuis, C. (2010). Pricing carbon: The European Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, A. (2009). The European Emissions Trading Scheme: An exploratory study of how companies learn to account for carbon. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 488–498. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, A., Knoll, L., & Huth, M. (2008). Preparing for the ‘Real’ market: National patterns of institutional learning and company behaviour in the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). European Environment, 18, 276–297. doi:10.1002/eet.485
   Google Scholar
• Engels, A., Tianbao, Q., & Sternfeld, E. (2014). Carbon governance in China by the creation of a carbon market. In B. Stephan & R. Lane (Eds.), The Politics of Carbon Markets (pp. 150–170). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (1996). Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review, 39, 80–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagelmann, F., & Frondel, M. (2005). The impact of emission trading on innovation – Science fiction or reality. European Environment, 15, 203–211. doi:10.1002/eet.387
   Google Scholar
• Hentrich, S., Matschoss, P., & Michaelis, P. (2009). Emissions trading and competitiveness: Lessons from Germany. Climate Policy, 9, 316–329. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, M. (2010). Variations of Corporate Behavior in an Emerging Emissions Market. The Case of the EU ETS. (Global Transformations towards a Low Carbon Society Working Paper 3) Engels, A. (Ed). Hamburg: University of Hamburg/KlimaCampus.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, V. H., Trautmann, T., & Schneider, M. (2008). A taxonomy for regulatory uncertainty - Application to the European Emission Trading Scheme. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 712–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraitė, J., Convery, F., & Di Maria, C. (2010). Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: Lessons from Ireland. Climate Policy, 10, 190–215. doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaraitė-Kažukauskė, J., & Kažukauskas, A. (2014). Do transaction costs influence firm trading behaviour in the European Emissions Trading System? Environmental and Resource Economics, 62, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, J. A., & Draper, N. R. (1980). An alternative family of transformations. Applied Statistics, 29, 190–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, A. K., & Brett, C. (2011). Societies consuming nature: A panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1960–2003. Social Science Research, 40, 226–244. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Jotzo, F., & Löschel, A. (2014). Emissions trading in China: Emerging experiences and international lessons. Energy. Policy, 75, 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, L. (2012a). Über die Rechtfertigung wirtschaftlichen Handelns. CO₂-Handel in der kommunalen Energiewirtschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, L. (2012b). Wirtschaftliche Rationalitäten. In A. Engels & L. Knoll (Eds.), Wirtschaftliche Rationalität – Soziologische Perspektiven (pp. 47–66). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Kossoy, A., Oppermann, K., Reddy, R. C., Bosi, M., & Boukerche, S. (2013). Mapping carbon pricing initiatives. Developments and prospects. Washington, DC: Ecofys.
   Google Scholar
• Leicht, K. T., & Fennell, M. L. (2008). Institutionalism and the professions. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 431–448). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muuls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2013). The impact of the EU ETS on regulated firms: What is the evidence after eight years? Retrieved from the Social Science Research Network website: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2344376
   Google Scholar
• McCann, L., Colby, B., Easter, K. W, Kasterine, A., & Kuperan, K. (2005). Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecological Economics, 52, 527–542. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, A. (2007). The impacts of law on ETS. Climate Policy, 7, 262–264. doi:10.1080/14693062.2007.9685654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 395–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perthuis, C., & Trotignon, R. (2014). Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU ETS. Energy Policy, 75, 100–106. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulver, S. (2007). Making sense of corporate environmentalism – An environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment, 20, 44–83. doi:10.1177/1086026607300246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reger, B., Sheridan, P., Simmering, D., Otte, A., & Waldhardt, R. (2009). Potential effects of direct transfer payments on farmland habitat diversity in a marginal European landscape. Environmental Management, 43, 1026–1038. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9270-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K., Schneider, M., & Hoffmann, V. (2011). The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System - Findings of company case studies in the German power sector. Ecological Economics, 70, 513–523. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270–277. doi:10.2307/2393719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B. (2010). EU Emissions Trading: Legitimacy and stringency. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 295–308. doi:10.1002/eet.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, T., & Fazekas, D. (2013). Distributional choices in EU climate policy: 20 years of policy practice. Climate Policy, 13, 240–258. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.745111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T. H. (1990). Using economic incentives to maintain our environment. Challenge, 33(2), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaklan, A. (2013). Why do emitters trade carbon permits? Firm-level evidence from the European Emission Trading Scheme (EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2013/19). Retrieved from EUI website: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/26254/RSCAS_2013_19.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar