Free allocation rules in the EU emissions trading system: what does the empirical literature show?

References

• Åhman, M., Burtraw, D., Kruger, J., & Zetterberg, L. (2007). A ten-year rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1718–1730. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexeeva-Talebi, V. (2010). Cost pass-through in strategic oligopoly: Sectoral evidence for the EU ETS ( Discussion Paper 10-056). Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).
   Google Scholar
• Alexeeva-Talebi, V. (2011). Cost pass-through of the EU emissions allowances: Examining the European petroleum markets. Energy Economics, 33, S75–S83. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L., & Goulder, L. H. (2000). Neutralising the adverse industry impacts of CO2 abatement policies: what does it cost? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 00-27).
   Google Scholar
• Branger, F., Ponssard, J. P., Sartor, O., & Sato, M. (2015). EU ETS, free allocations, and activity level thresholds: The devil lies in the details. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(3), 401–437. doi: 10.1086/682343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernyavs’ka, L., & Gullì, F. (2008). Marginal CO2 cost pass-through under imperfect competition in power markets. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 408–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Social Economics, 3, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruyn, S., Markowska, A., de Jong, F., & Bles, M. (2010a). Does the energy intensive industry obtain windfall profits through the EU ETS? Delft: CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruyn, S., Markowska, A., & Nelissen, D. (2010b). Will the energy-intensive industry profit from EU ETS under Phase 3? Delft: CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruyn, S., Nelissen, D., & Koopman, M. (2013). Carbon leakage and the future of the EU ETS market – impact of recent developments in the EU ETS on the list of sectors deemed to be exposed to carbon leakage. Delft: CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruyn, S., Schep, E., Cherif, S., & Huigen, T. (2016), Calculation of additional profits of sectors and firms from the EU ETS 2008–2015. Delft: CE Delft.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruyn, S., Vergeer, R., Schep, E., ‘t Hoen, M., Korteland, M., Cludius, J., … Healy, S. (2015). Ex-post investigation of cost pass-through in the EU ETS – An analysis for six sectors. Report for the European Commission, CE Delft and Oeko-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• De Vivo, N., & Marin, G. (2018). How neutral is the choice of the allocation mechanism in cap-and-trade schemes? Evidence from the EU ETS. Argomenti, 9, 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, D. (2008). New entrant and closure provisions: How do they distort? The Energy Journal, 29, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, D., Convery, F., & de Perthuis, C. (2010). Pricing carbon – The European Union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Impact assessment accompanying the commission decision determining a list of sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage pursuant to Article 10a (13) of Directive 2003/87/EC, staff working paper. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Decision 2011/278/EU on determining union-wide rules for harmonised free emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Decision 2013/448/EU concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Impact assessment accompanying the document proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, working document. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. (2003). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emissions trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Brussels: European Parliament and Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. (2009). Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community. Brussels: European Parliament and Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. (2018). Directive 2018/410 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814. Brussels: European Parliament and Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fabra, N., & Reguant, M. (2014). Pass-through of emissions costs in electricity markets. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2872–2899. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell, H. (2010). EU-ETS and Nordic electricity: A CVAR analysis. The Energy Journal, 31(2), 1–25. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fezzi, C., & Bunn, D. W. (2009). Structural interactions of European carbon trading and energy prices. The Journal of Energy Markets, 2(4), 53–69. doi: 10.21314/JEM.2009.034
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, C. J. P., & da Silva, P. P. (2013). Evaluation of dynamic pass-through of carbon prices into electricity prices – a cointegrated VECM analysis. International Journal of Public Policy, 9(1-2), 65–85. doi: 10.1504/IJPP.2013.053440
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, C. J. P., & da Silva, P. P. (2015). European Union emissions trading scheme impact on the Spanish electricity price during phase II and phase III implementation. Utilities Policy, 33, 54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. W., & Stavins, R. N. (2011). The effect of allowance allocations on cap-and-trade system performance. The Journal of Law and Economics, 54, S267–S294. doi: 10.1086/661942
   Google Scholar
• Hintermann, B. (2016). Pass-through of CO2 emission costs to hourly electricity prices in Germany. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(4), 857–891. doi: 10.1086/688486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkatukia, J., Mälkönen, V., & Perrels, A. (2006). Impacts of the European emission trade system on Finnish wholesale electricity prices (VATT Discussion Paper 405). Government Institute for Economic Research (VATT), Helsinki (Finland).
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, R., & Kilic, M. (2015). Time variation in European carbon pass-through rates in electricity futures prices. Energy Policy, 86, 239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2018). Why does emissions trading under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical Findings From the Literature, Climate Policy. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145
   Google Scholar
• Jouvet, P., & Solier, B. (2013). An overview of CO2 cost pass-through to electricity prices in Europe. Energy Policy, 61, 1370–1376. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppler, J. H., & Cruciani, M. (2010). Rents in the European power sector due to carbon trading. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4280–4290. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., Köppl, A., Schleicher, S. P., & Thenius, G. (2008). Stringency and distribution in the EU emissions trading scheme: First evidence. Climate Policy, 8, 41–61. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., de Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014a). Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2482–2508. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.8.2482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., de Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014b). On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme. Ecological Economics, 105, 78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Vanderborght, B., Ancygier, A., Atasoy, A. T., Haussner, M., Ismer, R., … Schopp, A. (2014). Carbon control and competitiveness post 2020: The cement report. Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer, U., Alexeeva-Talebi, V., & Löschel, A. (2010). Understanding the competitiveness implications of future phases of EU ETS on the industrial sectors (Discussion Paper 10-044). Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Perino, G., & Willner, M. (2017). EU-ETS Phase IV: Allowance prices, design choices and the market stability reserve. Climate Policy, 17(7), 936–946. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1360173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reguant, M., & Ellerman, D. (2008). Grandfathering and the endowment effect: An assessment in the context of the Spanish National Allocation Plan (MIT CEEPR Working Paper 08-018).
   Google Scholar
• Reinaud, J. (2005). Industrial competitiveness under the European Union emissions trading scheme ( IEA Information Paper). Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sartor, O., Pallière, C., & Lecourt, S. (2014). Benchmark-based allocations in EU ETS Phase 3: An early assessment. Climate Policy, 14(4), 507–524. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.872888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., Neuhoff, K., Graichen, V., Schumacher, K., & Matthes, F. (2015). Sectors under scrutiny: Evaluation of indicators to assess the risk of carbon leakage in the UK and Germany. Environmental and Resource Economics, 60, 99–124. doi: 10.1007/s10640-014-9759-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijm, J. P. M., Hers, J. S., Lise, W., & Wetzelaer, B. J. H. W. (2008). The impact of the EU ETS on electricity prices, final report to DG Environment of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), 49–72. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2006.0604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenqvist, C., & Åhman, M. (2016), Free allocation in the 3rd EU ETS period: Assessing two manufacturing sectors. Climate Policy, 16(2), 125–144. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.979130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoenes, S. (2014). Understanding the determinants of electricity prices and the impact of the German nuclear moratorium in 2011. The Energy Journal, 35(4), 61–78. doi: 10.5547/01956574.35.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verde, S. F. (2018). The impact of the EU emissions trading system on competitiveness and carbon leakage. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2018/53, European University Institute, Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Verde, S. F., Graf, C., & Jong, T. (2018). Installation entries and exits in the EU ETS: Patterns and the delay effect of closure provisions. Energy Economics. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Volleberg, H. R. J., de Vries, J. L., & Koutstaal, P. R. (1997). Hybrid carbon incentive mechanisms and political acceptability. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zachmann, G., & von Hirschhausen, C. (2008). First evidence of asymmetric cost pass-through of EU emissions allowances: Examining wholesale electricity prices in Germany. Economics Letters, 99(3), 465–469. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaklan, A. (2016). Free allocation and the endowment effect in cap-and-trade systems: Evidence from the European electricity sector. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2016: Demographischer Wandel – Session: Energy Markets, No. C02-V2.
   Google Scholar