Climate change mitigation strategies for agriculture: an analysis of nationally determined contributions, biennial reports and biennial update reports

References

• Aguerre, T. (2017, July 21). Uruguay’s Minister of Agriculture on tackling enteric methane. Climate and Clean Air Coalition. Retrieved from http://www.ccacoalition.org/ru/node/2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, A., Streck, C., Roe, S., Zurek, M., Haupt, F., & Dolginow, A. (2014). Strategies for mitigating climate change in agriculture: Abridged report. Climate Focus and California Environmental Associates, Prepared with the Support of the Climate and Land Use Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Dolšak, N. (2009). Climate change policy implementation: A cross-sectional analysis. Review of Policy Research, 26(5), 551–570. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenack, K. (2012). Archetypes of adaptation to climate change. In M. Glaser, G. Krause, B. Ratter, & M. Welp (Eds.), Human/nature interactions in the anthropocene: Potentials of social-ecological systems analysis (pp. 107–122). New York, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2016). The agriculture sectors in the intended nationally determined contributions – Analysis (Environment and Natural Resources Management working paper no. 62). Rome.
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. (2017). Emissions database – Agriculture. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. (2018). Emissions database – Emissions by sector. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/EM
   Google Scholar
• Fischedick, M., & Roy, J. (2014). Industry. In O. Edenhofer (Ed.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change: Working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 739–810). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., … Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K., Allen, B., Keenleyside, C., Nanni, S., Maréchal, A., Paquel, K., … Ziemann, J. (2017). Research for Agri-Committee – The consequences of climate change for EU agriculture: follow-up to the COP21 UN Paris Climate Change Conference (IP/B/AGRI/IC/2016-20).
   Google Scholar
• Henders, S., & Ostwald, M. (2014). Accounting methods for international land-related leakage and distant deforestation drivers. Ecological Economics, 99, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, B., & Lankoski, J. (2017). The economic consequences of potential agricultural contributions to climate change mitigation: A scoping paper. Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Höhne, N., Fekete, H., den Elzen, M. G. J., Hof, A. F., & Kuramochi, T. (2018). Assessing the ambition of post-2020 climate targets: A comprehensive framework. Climate Policy, 18(4), 425–441. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1294046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Vol. 4 Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, H. S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, and K. Tanabe (Eds.). Japan: IGES.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla … X. Zhou (Eds.), Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2014). The three Worlds of Environmental Politics. In A. Duit (Ed.), State and environment: The comparative study of environmental governance (pp. 81–109). Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Kuramochi, T., Höhne, N., Schaeffer, M., Cantzler, J., Hare, B., Deng, Y., … Blok, K. (2017). Ten key short-term sectoral benchmarks to limit warming to 1.5°C. Climate Policy. doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1397495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankoski, J., Ignaciuk, A., & Franck, J. (2018). Synergies and trade-offs between adaptation, mitigation and agricultural productivity: A synthesis report (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries papers no. 110). Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, A., Kohyama, K., Yagi, K., Takata, Y., & Obara, H. (2017). The effects of current water management practices on methane emissions in Japanese rice cultivation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(1), 85–98. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9665-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lininger, C. (Ed.). (2015). Springer climate. Consumption-based approaches in international climate policy. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2001). Combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D., Lucas, A., & Barnes, A. (2013). Mitigation win-win. Nature Climate Change, 3, 611–613. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Domínguez, I., Fellmann, T., Weiss, F., Witzke, P., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Himics, M., … Leip, A. (2016). An economic assessment of GHG mitigation policy options for EU agriculture (ecAMPA2) (JRC Science for Policy Report). doi:10.2791/843461.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. R., Howden, M., & Smith, P. (2017). Considering agriculture in IPCC assessments. Nature Climate Change, 7(10), 680–683. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., & Goulding, K. W. T. (2011). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: A critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62, 42–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. B. (2010). Agenda-Setting and climate change. In H. Compston (Ed.), Climate change and political strategy (pp. 123–141). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., Bruuns, T. B., Campbell, B. M., Gregersen, L. E., Huyer, S., Kuntze, V., … Vasileiou, I. (2015). How countries plan to address agricultural adaptation and mitigation: An analysis of intended nationally determined contributions (CGIAR, CCAFS info note).
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M., Gregersen, L., Kuntze, V., Madsen, S., Oldvig, M., Campbell, B., & Vasileiou, I. (2015). Agriculture’s prominence in the INDCs: Analysis of agriculture in countries’ climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (CGIAR, CCAFS info note).
   Google Scholar
• Richards, M. B., Wollenberg, E., & van Vuuren, D. (2018). National contributions to climate change mitigation from agriculture: Allocating a global target. Climate Policy, 18(10), 1271–1285. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1430018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, F., & Rielle, Y. (2013). Sorting through the garbage can: Under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs? Policy Sciences, 46(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9165-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setyanto, P., Pramono, A., Adriany, T. A., Susilawati, H. L., Tokida, T., Padre, A. T., & Minamikawa, K. (2018). Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 64(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., & Bustamante, M. (2014). Agriculture, forestry and other land Use (AFOLU). In O. Edenhofer (Ed.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change: Working group III contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 811–922). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerer, T. (2014). Early bird or copycat, leader or laggard? A comparison of cross-national patterns of environmental policy change. In A. Duit (Ed.), State and environment: The comparative study of environmental governance (pp. 149–177). Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Sterl, S., Gonzales-Zuniga, S., Fekete, H., Fyson, C., Cantzler, J., Fuentes, U., … Peters, D. (2018). What’s on the table? Mitigating agricultural emissions while achieving food security. CAT Decarbonisation Series.
   Google Scholar
• Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Ferrara, A. F., House, J., Federici, S., Rossi, S., … Smith, P. (2015). The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming, 1990–2012. Global Change Biology, 21, 2655–2660. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2013). CRF tables for SBSTA 39. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/greenhouse-gas-inventories-annex-i-parties/reporting-requirements
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). Paris agreement. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2016). Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: An update: Synthesis report by the secretariat (FCCC/CP/2016/2).
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2017a). NDC contributions. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/ndcregistry/Pages/All.aspx
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2017b). INDC contributions. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018a). Reporting and review under the convention (Biennial update reports). Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/biennial-update-reports-and-international-consultation-and-analysis-non-annex-i-parties/biennial-update-reports
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018b). BUR contributions. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-convention/biennial-update-reports-0
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018c). BR contributions. Bonn, Germany. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/reporting-and-review-under-the-convention/national-communications-and-biennial-reports-Annex I-parties/submitted-biennial-reports-brs-from-Annex I-parties
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC/CP23. (2017). Decision -/CP.23 Koronivia joint work on agriculture. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/bonn_nov_2017/application/pdf/cp23_auv_agri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2017). The emissions gap report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, A., Reisinger, A., Wollenberg, E., & van Dijk, S. (2017). Measurement, reporting and verification of livestock GHG emissions by developing countries in the UNFCCC: Current practices and opportunities for improvement (CCAFS report, no. 17). Wageningen: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and Global Research Alliance for Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA).
   Google Scholar
• Wollenberg, E., Richards, M., Smith, P., Havlík, P., Obersteiner, M., Tubiello, F. N., … Campbell, B. M. (2016). Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2°C target. Global Change Biology, 22(12), 3859–3864. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar