References
- Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590.
- Anderton, K., & Setzer, J. (2018). Subnational climate entrepreneurship: Innovative climate action in California and São Paulo. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1273–1284.
- Argyris, C. (1977). Double-loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125.
- Argyris, C., & Schön, M. (1994). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Barber, B. (2017). Cool cities: Urban sovereignty and the fix for global warming. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Blumm, M., & Wood, M. (2017). No ordinary lawsuit: Climate change, due process, and the public trust doctrine. American University Law Review, 67(1), 1–87.
- Boasson, E. L., & Huitema, D. (2017). Climate governance entrepreneurship: Emerging findings and a new research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1343–1361.
- Brizga, J., Mishchuk, Z., & Golubovska-Onisimova, A. (2014). Sustainable consumption and production governance in countries in transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 45–53.
- Brown, H., & Vergragt, P. (2008). Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 107–130.
- C40. (2018). Consumption-based GHG emissions of C40 cities. London: C40. Retrieved from https://www.c40.org/researches/consumption-based-emissions
- Castán Broto, V., Glendinning, S., Dewberry, E., Walsh, C., & Powell, M. (2014). What can we learn about transitions for sustainability from infrastructure shocks? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84, 186–196.
- Chapple, K., Wegmann, J., Mashood, F., & Coleman, R. (2017). Jumpstarting the market for accessory dwelling units: Lessons learned from Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver. San Francisco: Urban Land Institute. Retrieved from http://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/uploads/ADU_report_4.18.pdf
- Clune, S., Morrissey, J., & Moore, T. (2012). Size matters: House size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments. Energy Policy, 48, 657–667.
- Cohen, M. (2017). The future of consumer society: Prospects for sustainability in the new economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Cohen, M., Brown, H., & Vergragt, P. (Eds.). (2013). Innovations in sustainable consumption: New economics, socio-technical transitions, and social practices. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
- Cohen, M., Brown, H., & Vergragt, P. (Eds.). (2017). Social change and the coming of post-consumer society: Theoretical advances and policy implications. New York: Routledge.
- Cohen, M. J. (2010). The international political economy of (un)sustainable consumption and the global financial collapse. Environmental Politics, 19(1), 107–126.
- Cuppen, E., Pesch, U., Remmerswaal, S., & Taanman, M. (2016). Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–262.
- Davies, A., Fahy, F., & Rau, H. (2014). Challenging consumption: Pathways to a more sustainable future. New York: Routledge.
- Department of Environmental Protection (DEQ). (2014). Accessory dwelling units in Portland, Oregon: Evaluation and interpretation of a survey of ADU owners. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/ADU-surveyinterpret.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2004). Oregon strategy for greenhouse gas reductions. Governor’s advisory group on global warming (page 106). Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/energy/Data-and-Reports/Documents/2004%20Oregon%20Strategy%20for%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Reductions%20Report%20Legislature.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2007). Oregon DEQ waste prevention strategy: Ten year framework and short-term plan. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/wprWPrevStrategy.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2010). A life cycle approach to prioritizing methods of preventing waste from the residential construction sector in the state of Oregon (Phase 2 report). Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/ADU-ResBldgLCA-Report.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2011a). Briefing paper: Oregon’s solid waste hierarchy: Intent and uses. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-SWHierarchy.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2011b). Briefing paper: Materials management and greenhouse gases. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-GreenhouseGases.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2011c). Consumption-based greenhouse gases emissions inventory for Oregon—2005. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate-mitigation-adaptation/SEI-Oregon-CBEI-summary-report.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2012a). Briefing paper: Sustainable consumption and waste prevention. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-SustConsumpWastePrevention.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2012b). Briefing paper: Waste prevention. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-WastePrevention.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2012c). Literature review: Key challenges in sustainable consumption. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-KeyChallengesSustCons.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2012d). Literature review: Alternatives for advancing sustainable production and consumption through government programs and policies. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/2050-AltAdvancingSustProd.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2012e). Materials management in Oregon: 2050 vision and framework for action. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/FilterDocs/MManagementOR.pdf
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2015, October 27). Presentation given to the Connecticut governor’s council on climate change: Exploring climate solutions webinar series.
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2018a). Oregon’s greenhouse gas emissions through 2015: An assessment of Oregon’s sector-based and consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions. Portland: DEQ. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/aq/programs/Pages/GHG-Oregon-Emissions.aspx
- Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). (2018b). Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/deq/aq/programs/Pages/GHG-Oregon-Emissions.aspx
- Erickson, P., Allaway, D., Lazarus, M., & Stanton, E. (2012). A consumption-based GHG inventory for the U.S. State of Oregon. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(7), 3679–3686.
- Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Franklin Associates. (2009). Life cycle assessment of drinking water delivery systems: Bottle water, tap water, and home/office delivery water. Portland: DEQ.
- Gilmore, E., & St. Clair, T. (2018). Budgeting for climate change: Obstacles and opportunities at the US state level. Climate Policy, 18(6), 729–741.
- Glasbergen, P. (1996). Learning to manage the environment. In W. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects (pp. 175–212). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
- Goodling, E., Green, J., & McClintock, N. (2015). Uneven development of a sustainable city: Shifting capital in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geography, 36(4), 504–527.
- Green, J. (2017). Policy entrepreneurship in climate governance: Toward a comparative approach. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1471–1482.
- Hoornweg, D., Sugar, L., & Trejos Gómez, C. L. (2011). Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: Moving forward. Environment and Urbanization, 23(1), 207–227.
- Huitema, D., Boasson, E., & Beunen, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship in climate governance at the local and regional levels: Concepts, methods, patterns, and effects. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1247–1257.
- Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (Eds.). (2009). Water policy entrepreneurs. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
- Infranca, J. (2014). Housing changing households: Regulatory challenges for micro-units and accessory dwelling units. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 25, 53.
- IPCC. (2018). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change convened its first conference on the role of cities and climate change in Edmonton, Canada in March 2018. Retrieved from https://citiesipcc.org/
- Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow. New York: Routledge.
- Jones, C., & Kammen, D. (2011). Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. Households and communities. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(9), 4088–4095.
- Karapin, R. (2018). Not waiting for Washington: Climate policy adoption in California and New York. Political Science Quarterly, 133(2), 317–353.
- Kingdon, J. (1984/2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
- Krause, R. (2011). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. Cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 45–60.
- Liebig, P., Koenig, T., & Pynoos, J. (2006). Zoning, accessory dwelling units, and family caregiving: Issues, trends, and recommendations. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 18(3‒4), 155–172.
- Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44.
- Lutsey, N., & Sperling, D. (2008). America’s bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy, 36(2), 673–685.
- Lyon, C. (2018). Complexity ethics and the UNFCCC practices for 1.5°C climate change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 48–55.
- Mandal, D. (2018, June 1). How Portland’s “right to return” is indeed right to return housing to the underrepresented. Berkeley Political Review. Retrieved from https://bpr.berkeley.edu/2018/06/01/how-portlands-right-to-return-is-indeed-right-to-return-housing-to-the-underrepresented
- Marsh, T. (2012). To the promised land: A history of government and politics in Oregon. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
- Matsuda, W. (2018, May 16). What does gentrification look like in an overwhelmingly white city? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/16/lens/what-does-gentrification-look-like-in-an-overwhelmingly-white-city.html
- Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). Limits to growth. Washington, DC: Potomac Associates - Universe Books.
- Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of Innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
- Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2017). Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1362–1377.
- Nelson, A. (2013). Reshaping metropolitan America: Development trends and opportunities to 2030. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- O’Rourke, C. (2017, February 9). The 11-year-old suing Trump over climate change. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/trump-climate-lawsuit/516054
- Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.
- Pape, J., Rau, H., Fahy, F., & Davies, A. (2011). Developing policies and instruments for sustainable household consumption: Irish experiences and futures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(1), 25–42.
- Peters, G. (2008). From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 13–23.
- Peters, G., & Hertwich, E. (2008). Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 86(1‒2), 51–66.
- Rabe, B. (2004). Statehouse and greenhouse: The emerging politics of American climate change policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Heidrich, O., Church, J., Pietrpertosa, F., De Gregorio-Hurtado, S., … Ioannou, B. (2018). How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU-28. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 207–219.
- Reisch, L., & Thøgersen, J. (2015). Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
- Schor, J. (2005). Prices and quantities: Unsustainable consumption and the global economy. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 309–320.
- Senge, P. (1990). Building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 7–23.
- Sheingate. (2003). Political entrepreneurship, institutional change, and American political development. Studies in American Political Development, 17, 185–203.
- Soper, K. (2007). Re-thinking the “good life”: the citizenship dimension of consumer disaffection with consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 205–229.
- Steel, B., Henkels, M., & Clucas, R. (Eds.). (2005). Oregon politics and government: Progressives versus conservative populists. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
- Stephan, A., & Crawford, R. (2016). The relationship between house size and life cycle energy demand: Implications for energy efficiency regulations for buildings. Energy, 116, 1158–1171.
- Syse, K., & Mueller, M. (Eds.). (2014). Sustainable consumption and the good life: Interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2009). Sustainable materials management: The road ahead. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/sustainable_materials_management_the_road_ahead.pdf
- Urban Sustainability Directors Network (USDN). (2016). USDN sustainable consumption toolkit. Retrieved from http://sustainableconsumption.usdn.org
- Urban Sustainability Directors Network (USDN), Sustainable Consumption Research and Action Initiative (SCORAI), and One Earth. (2015). Eugene Memorandum: The role of cities in advancing sustainable consumption. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 11(1), 1–4.
- Vergragt, P., & Brown, H. (2007). Sustainable mobility: From technological innovations to societal learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11‒12), 1104–1115.
- Vergragt, P. J. (2017). Sustainable consumption: An important but ambiguous concept. In J. Meadowcroft & D. J. Fiorino (Eds.), Conceptual innovation in environmental policy (pp. 307–333). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Viggers, H., Keall, M., Wickens, K., & Howden-Chapman, P. (2017). Increased house size can cancel out the effect of improved insulation on overall heating energy requirements. Energy Policy, 107, 248–257.
- Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice as social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
- Wilson, A., & Boehland, J. (2005). Small is beautiful: U.S. House size, resource use, and the environment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 277–287.
- World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2008). Sustainable consumption fact s and trends: From a business perspective. Geneva: WBCSD. Retrieved from http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Modules/Library/WBCSD_Sustainable_Consumption_web.pdf
- World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2011). A vision for sustainable consumption: Innovation, collaboration, and the management of choice. Geneva: WBCSD. Retrieved from https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/People/Sustainable-Lifestyles/Resources/A-Vision-for-Sustainable-Consumption
- Young, R. (2016). The Oregon way: Planning a sustainable economy in the American west. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(1), 76–89.