Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement and the costs of delayed action

References

• Admiraal, A., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Turkovska, O., Roelfsema, M., & van Soest, H. (2015). Assessing intended nationally determined contributions to the Paris Climate Agreement – What are the projected global and national emission levels for 2025–2030. Bilthoven: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Admiraal, A. K., Hof, A. F., den Elzen, M. G. J., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2016). Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(8), 1165–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anandarajah, G., Pye, S., Usher, W., Kesicki, F., & Mcglade, C. (2011). TIAM-UCL global model documentation. UCL. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/tiam-ucl/
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Emmerling, J., Fricko, O., Fujimori, S., Hilaire, J., … van Vuuren, D. P. (2017). Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector – Quantifying the narratives. Global Environmental Change, 42, 316–330. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, N., McGlade, C., Hilaire, J., & Ekins, P. (2018). Divestment prevails over the green paradox when anticipating strong future climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 8(2), 130–134. doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Sgobbi, A., & Tavoni, M. (2009). Delayed action and uncertain stabilisation targets. How much will the delay cost? Climatic Change, 96(3), 299–312. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9630-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., Cranston Turner, J., & Ward, B. (2015). Tracking intended nationally determined contributions: What are the implications for greenhouse gas emissions in 2030? ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarolis, J., Daly, H., Dodds, P., Keppo, I., Li, F., McDowall, W., … Zeyringer, M. (2017). Formalizing best practice for energy system optimization modelling. Applied Energy, 194, 184–198. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, T., & Lindroos, T. J. (2015). An analysis of countries’ climate change mitigation contributions towards the Paris Agreement. White Paper, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., Hughes, N., Pye, S., Winning, M., Macrory, R., Milligan, B., … Watson, J. (2017). The role of CCS in meeting climate policy targets. Report for the Global CCS Institute. Retrieved from http://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/201833/report-role-ccs-meeting-climate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, A. A., Iyer, G. C., Clarke, L. E., Edmonds, J. A., Hultman, N. E., McJeon, H. C., … Shi, W. (2015). Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambhir, A., Drouet, L., McCollum, D., Napp, T., Bernie, D., Hawkes, A., … Lowe, J. (2017). Assessing the feasibility of global long-term mitigation scenarios. Energies, 10, e89. doi: 10.3390/en10010089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubler, A., Wilson, C., Bento, N., Boza-Kiss, B., Krey, V., McCollum, D. L., … Valin, H. (2018). A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5°C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nature Energy, 3(6), 515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuberger, C. F., Staffell, I., Shah, N., & MacDowell, N. (2018). Impact of myopic decision making and disruptive events in power systems planning. Nature Energy, 3, 634–640. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0159-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof, A. F., den Elzen, M. G. J., Admiraal, A., Roelfsema, M., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2017). Global and regional abatement costs of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2°C and 1.5°C. Environmental Science and Policy, 71, 30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2018). Renewable power generation costs in 2017. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, M., Luderer, G., Steckel, J., Tavoni, M., & Monjon, S. (2012). Time to act now? Assessing the costs of delaying climate measures and benefits of early action. Climatic Change, 114(1), 79–99. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0128-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppo, I., & Rao, S. (2007). International climate regimes: Effects of delayed participation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(7), 962–979. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitous, A., & Keramidas, K. (2015). Analysis of scenarios integrating the INDCs – JRC policy brief. JRC policy brief analysis. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/current-climate-commitments-would-increase-global-temperature-around-3-degrees
   Google Scholar
• Kypreos, S., & Lehtila, A. (2013). TIMES-MACRO: Decomposition into hard-linked LP and NLP problems. ETSAP TIMES 3.4 user note.
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190. doi: 10.1038/nature14016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, F. C., & Diaz, D. B. (2015). Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 127–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerini, F., Keppo, I., & Strachan, N. (2017). Myopic decision making in energy system decarbonisation pathways. A UK case study. Energy Strategy Reviews, 17, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J., & Keppo, I. (2017). Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models. Applied Energy, 195, 356–369. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pye, S., McGlade, C., Bataille, C., Anandarajah, G., Denis-Ryan, A., & Potashnikov, V. (2016). Exploring national decarbonization pathways and global energy trade flows: A multi-scale analysis. Climate Policy, 16(sup1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1179619
   Google Scholar
• Riahi, K., Kriegler, E., Johnson, N., Bertram, C., den Elzen, M., Eom, J., … Edenhofer, O. (2015). Locked into Copenhagen pledges—Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., … Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639. doi: 10.1038/nature18307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., Luderer, G., Emmerling, J., Gernaat, D., … Tavoni, M. (2018). Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5°C. Nature Climate Change. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Schaeffer, M., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N. P., van Vuuren, D. P., Riahi, K., … Knutti, R. (2016). Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nature Climate Change, 6(3), 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, T., & Pierfederici, R. (2015, October). Beyond the numbers: Understanding the transformation induced by INDCs. Beyond the numbers: Understanding the transformation induced by INDCs. A report of the MILES Project Consortium, 80. Retrieved from http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Beyond-the-numbers-Understanding-the-transformation-induced-by-INDCs
   Google Scholar
• Strefler, J., Bauer, N., Kriegler, E., Popp, A., Giannousakis, A., & Edenhofer, O. (2018). Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2018). The emissions gap report 2018. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015a, December). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-First Session, 21932, 32. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015b, October 30). Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions. FCCC/CP/2015/7. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandyck, T., Keramidas, K., Saveyn, B., Kitous, A., & Vrontisi, Z. (2016). A global stocktake of the Paris pledges: Implications for energy systems and economy. Global Environmental Change, 41, 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest, H. L., de Boer, H. S., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M. G. J., Admiraal, A., van Vuuren, D. P., … Forsell, N. (2017). Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems. Climatic Change, 144(2), 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., … Rose, S. K. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change, 109(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., Gernaat, D. E., Berg, M., Bijl, D. L., Boer, H. S., … van Sluisveld, M. A. E. (2018). Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nature Climate Change, 8(5), 391–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, R., Lowe, J. A., Arnell, N. W., Hope, C., Berry, P., Brown, S., … Vanderwal, J. (2013). The AVOID programme’s new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 55–70. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0814-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar