Co-financing in the green climate fund: lessons from the global environment facility

References

• Abadie, L. M., Galarraga, I., & Rübbelke, D. (2013). An analysis of the causes of the mitigation bias in international climate finance. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(7), 943–955. doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9401-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adenle, A. A., Manning, D. T., & Arbiol, J. (2017). Mitigating climate change in Africa: Barriers to financing low-carbon development. World Development, 100, 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antimiani, A., Costantini, V., Markandya, A., Paglialunga, E., & Sforna, G. (2017). The green climate fund as an effective compensatory mechanism in global climate negotiations. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 49–68. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2008). Climate treaties and the imperative of enforcement. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, 239–258. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grn015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betzold, C., & Weiler, F. (2017). Allocation of aid for adaptation to climate change: Do vulnerable countries receive more support? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 17–36. doi: 10.1007/s10784-016-9343-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosello, F., Carraro, C., & Decian, E. (2010). Climate policy and the optimal balance between mitigation, adaptation and unavoided damage. Climate Change Economics, 01(2), 71–92. doi: 10.1142/S201000781000008X
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, M., & Minas, S. (2019). Resilience through interlinkage: The green climate fund and climate finance governance. Climate Policy, 19(3), 342–353. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1513358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechin, S. R., & Espinoza, M. I. (2017). A case for further refinement of the green climate fund’s 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation allocation framework: Toward a more targeted approach. Climatic Change, 142(3–4), 311–320. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-1938-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clémençon, R. (2006). What future for the global environment facility? The Journal of Environment & Development, 15(1), 50–74. doi: 10.1177/1070496506286438
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., & Sforna, G. (2014). Do bilateral trade relationships influence the distribution of CDM projects? Climate Policy, 14(5), 559–580. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.871467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. B., & Huang, Y. (2018). Exploring the schemes for green climate fund financing: International lessons. World Development, 101, 173–187. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L. B., Zhu, L., Springmann, M., & Fan, Y. (2014). Design and analysis of the green climate fund. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3), 266–299. doi: 10.1007/s11518-014-5250-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, K. C., Dellink, R. B., & Tol, R. S. J. (2009). AD-DICE: An implementation of adaptation in the DICE model. Climatic Change, 95, 63–81. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9535-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Chazournes, L. B. (2005). The global environment facility (GEF): A unique and crucial institution. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 14(3), 193–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.00441.x
   Google Scholar
• De Nevers, M. (2017). Assessing “leverage” in the climate investment funds. CGD policy paper. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ervine, K. (2007). The greying of green governance: Power politics and the global environment facility. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 18(4), 125–142. doi: 10.1080/10455750701705161
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Sahni, A., Savvas, A., & Ward, J. (2016). Where are the gaps in climate finance? Climate and Development, 8(3), 203–206. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2015.1064811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K. (2006). One basin at a time: The global environment facility and governance of transboundary waters. Global Environmental Politics, 4(4), 108–141. doi: 10.1162/glep.2004.4.4.108
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility (GEF). (1994). GEF council: A proposed statement of work. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2010a). IFC-Earth fund platform: 2010 annual report. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2010b). System for transparent allocation of resources (STAR). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2014). Co-financing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2015). Instrument for the establishment of the restructured Global Environment Facility. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Green Climate Fund (GCF). (2014). Initial results management framework of the fund. Republic of Korea: Songdo.
   Google Scholar
• Green Climate Fund (GCF). (2018). Co-financing matters. Republic of Korea: Songdo.
   Google Scholar
• Green Climate Fund (GCF). (2019). GCF at a glance. Republic of Korea: Songdo.
   Google Scholar
• Harmeling, S., & Eckstein, D. (2012). Global climate risk index 2013 - who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather relatedloss events in 2011 and 1992 to 2011. Berlin: German Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Jotzo, F., Depledge, J., & Winkler, H. (2018). US and international climate policy under President Trump. Climate Policy, 18(7), 813–817. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1490051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., Antimiani, A., Costantini, V., Martini, C., Palma, A., & Tommasino, M. C. (2015). Analyzing trade-offs in international climate policy options: The case of the green climate fund. World Development, 74, 93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., Paglialunga, E., Costantini, V., & Sforna, G. (2017). Global and regional economic damages from climate change. Oxford research encyclopedia of environmental science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, B. (2014). Performance-based formulaic resource allocation a cautionary tale: Some lessons for the green climate fund from multilateral funding. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies Working Paper Series EV 60.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., & Dornan, M. (2017). International financing for climate change adaptation in small island developing states. Regional Environmental Change, 17(4), 1103–1115. doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1085-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., Tan-Mullins, M., Ockwell, D., & Peter Newell, P. (2017). Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s least developed countries fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation. Third World Quarterly, 38(6), 1249–1271. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1282816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steckel, J. C., Jakob, M., Flachsland, C., Kornek, U., Lessmann, K., & Edenhofer, O. (2017). From climate finance toward sustainable development finance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), e437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takiguchi, H. (2016). Global Environment Facility's support for sustainable waste management. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 18(2), 248–257. doi: 10.1007/s10163-015-0364-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undurraga, E. A., Carias, C., Meltzer, M., & Kahn, E. B. (2017). Potential for broad-scale transmission of Ebola virus disease during the West Africa crisis: Lessons for the global Health security agenda. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 6, 159. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0373-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Fifteenth Session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 29 December 2009, Addendum, Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its Fifteenth Session, FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1, UNFCCC Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). Decision 1/CP.21: Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Paris Climate Change Conference, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kerkhoff, L., Ahmad, I. H., Pittock, J., & Steffen, W. (2011). Designing the green climate fund: How to spend $100 billion sensibly. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(3), 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• van Vuuren, D. P., Isaac, M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Arnellm, N., Barkerm, T., Criqui, P., … Scrieciu, S. (2011). The use of scenarios as the basis for combined assessment of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 575–591. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, F., Klöck, C., & Dornan, M. (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, 104, 65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2016). Global Environment Facility Trust Fund (GEF): Independent Auditors’ Report and Statements of Receipts, Disbursements and Fund Balance. World Bank Reference: TF029840, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018). Global Environment Facility Trust Fund (GEF): Independent Auditors’ Report and Statements of Receipts, Disbursements and Fund Balance. World Bank Reference: TF029840, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. (2016). Energy service company and financial market development: Experiences of the global environment facility. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(5), 663–676. doi: 10.1007/s11027-014-9603-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B. K., & Miller, S. (2011). Climate Change Funds and Implications for LAC Countries and the IDB. Inter-American Development Bank Technical Notes, No. IDB-TN-289.
   Google Scholar