Revoking coal mining permits: an economic and legal analysis

References

• BGR (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources). (2018). BGR energy study: Data and developments concerning German and global energy supplies. Hannover, Germany: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A., & Dunlap, A. (2018). Normalising corporate counterinsurgency: Engineering consent, managing resistance and greening destruction around the Hambach coal mine and beyond. Political Geography, 62, 33–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brückner, B. (2017). Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: BGB, Band 7: Sachenrecht §§ 854-1296, WEG, ErbbauRG (7th edition). Munich: C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Tracker Initiative. (2017). Lignite of the living dead: Below 2°C scenario and strategy analysis for EU coal power investors. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Tracker Initiative. (2019). Apocalypse now. London, UK: Author. Retrieved from https://www.carbontracker.org/reports/apocoalypse-now/
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, F., Hepburn, C., & Teytelboym, A. (2019). Is natural capital really substitutable? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44, 425–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. (2014). Closing coal: Economic and moral incentives. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 492–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on Growth, Structural Change and Employment. (2019). Final report. Berlin: Federal ministry for economic affairs and energy (BMWi).
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., … Raskin, R. G. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Welle. (2019). German court orders suspension of Hambach Forest clearance [online]. Berlin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• DIW Berlin (German Institute for Economic Research), Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, and Ecologic Institute. (2019). Phasing out coal in the German Energy Sector: Interdependencies, challenges, and potential solutions. Retrieved from https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2019/3537-kohlereader_englisch-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, M. (2018, April 15). Ancient forest home of squatter communities is doomed by coal. [Online] National Geograhic. Retrieved from https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/04/hambach-forest-germany-logging-coal-conservation-science/
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., Steckel, J. C., Jakob, M., & Bertram, C. (2018). Reports of coal’s terminal decline may be exaggerated. Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, P. (2018). Confronting carbon lock-in: Canada’s oil sands (Discussion brief), Stockholm Environment Institute, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, P., Lazarus, M., & Piggot, G. (2018). Limiting fossil fuel production as the next big step in climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 8, 1037–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Your social security rights in Germany. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Directorate C, Unit C.2. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=13751&langId=en
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. D., Hepburn, C., Ives, M. C., Hale, T., Wetzer, T., Mealy, P., … Way, R. (2019). Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. Science, 364(6436), 132–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt). (2019). Methodological Convention 3.0 for the Determination of Environmental Costs: Cost Rates. February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fæhn, T., Hagem, C., Lindholt, L., Mæland, S., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2017). Climate policies in a fossil fuel producing country – demand versus supply side policies. The Energy Journal, 38(1), 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., Scotford, E., & Barritt, E. (2017). The legally disruptive nature of climate change. The Modern Law Review, 80(2), 173–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., … Helkowski, J. H. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O’Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Peters, G. P., … Zaehle, S. (2019). Global carbon budget 2019. Earth System Scientific Data, 11, 1783–1838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., … Le Quéré, C. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 850–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly, G., Setzer, J., & Heyvaert, V. (2018). If at first you don’t succeed: Suing corporations for climate change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(4), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser, T., Guivarch, C., Tachiiri, K., Jones, C. D., & Ciais, P. (2015). Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2°C. Nature Communications, 6, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Energy Monitor. (2019). Global Coal Plant Tracker. Summary statistics. Retrieved from https://endcoal.org/global-coal-plant-tracker/
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Denniss, R. (2018). Cutting with both arms of the scissors: The economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies. Climatic Change, 150, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., Brahmbhatt, M., & Liu, J. (2017). Multiple benefits from climate change mitigation: assessing the evidence. Policy report, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, J. F. (2018). Federal lands and fossil fuels: Maximizing social welfare in federal energy leasing. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 42, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2015). Natural capital: Valuing the planet. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imboden, C., & Moczek, N. (2015). Risks and opportunities in the biodiversity management and related stakeholder involvement of the RWE Hambach Lignite Mine. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global warming of 1.5°: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Paris, France: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). (2018). Coal Information 2018. Paris, France: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, J., Vinichenko, V., Nacke, L., & Cherp, A. (2019). Prospects for powering past coal. Nature Climate Change, 9(8), 592–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, F., Kjärstad, J., & Rootzén, J. (2019). The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Climate Policy, 19(2), 258–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öko-Institut. (2018). Dem Ziel verpflichtet  CO₂:  Mindestpreise im Instrumentenmix einer Kohle-Ausstiegsstrategie für Deutschland. Berlin: WWF Deutschland. Retrieved from https://mobil.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/WWF_Studie_Kohleausstieg_CO2_Mindestpreise.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kost, C., Shammugam, S., Jülch, V., Nguyen, H., & Schlegl, T. (2018). Levelized cost of electricity renewable energy technologies. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE.
   Google Scholar
• Kysar, D. A. (2011). What climate change can do about tort law. Environmental Law, 41(1), 1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, A., Kuriakose, J., Sharmina, M., & Anderson, K. (2018). What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations. Climate Policy, 18(6), 690–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larondelle, N., & Haase, D. (2012). Valuing post-mining landscapes using an ecosystem services approach—An example from Germany. Ecological Indicators, 18, 567–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, M., Erickson, P., & Tempest, K. (2015). Supply-side climate policy: the road less taken. Stockholm Environment Institute, Working Paper, SEI-WP-2015-13 (October), pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHarg, A., Barton, B., Bradbrook, A., & Godden, L., eds. (2010). Property and the law in energy and natural resources. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meidinger, E. E. (1980). The public uses of eminent domain: History and policy. Environmental Law, 11(1), 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelevitch, R., Hauenstein, C., & Holz, F. (2019). The death spiral of coal in the US: Will changes in US policy turn the tide? Climate Policy, 19(10), 1310–1324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J. H. (2005). Status and impacts of the German lignite industry. Swedish NGO Secretariat of Acid Rain.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics and Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2017). Principles of natural capital accounting: A background paper for those wanting to understand the concepts and methodology underlying the UK natural capital accounts being developed by ONS and Defra. London, UK: Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Oil Change International. (2018). The sky’s limit California: Why the Paris climate goals demand that California lead in a managed decline of oil extraction. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M., Edler, D., & Lehr, U. (2019). Ökonomische Indikatoren der Energiebereitstellung: Methode, Abgrenzung und Ergebnisse für den Zeitraum 2000-2017. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/201574/1/1669556603.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019, February 10). Climate Change Still Seen as the Top Global Threat, but Cyberattacks a Rising Concern.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, A., Hepburn, C., Vogt-Schilb, A., & Caldecott, B. (2018). Committed emissions from existing and planned power plants and asset stranding required to meet the Paris Agreement. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5), 054019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R. S. (2019). The social cost of carbon revisited. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 94, 140–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricke, K., Drouet, L., Caldeira, K., & Tavoni, M. (2018). Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), 895–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Schaeffer, M., Friedlingstein, P., Gillett, N. P., Van Vuuren, D. P., Riahi, K., … Knutti, R. (2016). Differences between carbon budget estimates unraveled. Nature Climate Change, 6(3), 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønne, A. (2010). Public and private rights to natural resources and differences in their protection. In A. McHarg, B. Barton, A. Bradbrook, & L. Godden (Eds.), Property and the law in energy and natural resources (pp. 60–79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RWE. (2018). Powering Into the Future: Annual Report 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. (2018). Climate change litigation databases. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. (2006). Provision of resources for the city by the Hambach opencast mine. International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG), Paper number 791.
   Google Scholar
• SEI, IISD, ODI, Climate Analytics, CICERO, and UNEP. (2019). The production gap: The discrepancy between countries’ planned fossil fuel production and global production levels consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C or 2°C. Retrieved from http://productiongap.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sinn, H. W. (2012). The green paradox: A supply-side approach to global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squillace, M. (2012). The tragic story of the federal coal leasing program. Natural Resources & Environment, 27, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Statistik der Kohlenwirtschaft. (2019). Lignite at a glance. Retrieved from https://kohlenstatistik.de/daten-fakten/
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, T., Barbier, E. B., Bateman, I., van den Bijgaart, I., Crépin, A. S., Edenhofer, O., … Lange, A. (2019). Policy design for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability, 2, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, D., Zhang, Q., Zheng, Y., Caldeira, K., Shearer, C., Hong, C., … Davis, S. J. (2019). Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5° C climate target. Nature, 572, 373–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, S., & de Groot, R. S. (2010). The TEEB valuation database–a searchable database of 1310 estimates of monetary values of ecosystem services. Wageningen, Netherlands: Foundation for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. L., & Asmus, D. F. (2006). Unitizing oil and gas fields around the world: A comparative analysis of national laws and private contracts. Houston Journal of International Law, 28, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, B. (2018, July 24). Germany’s coal exit commission. Clean Energy Wire, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, B. (2019). Saving Hambach Forest would make it “Germany’s most expensive woodland” - RWE CEO [online]. Clean Energy Wire. Retrieved from https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/saving-hambach-forest-would-make-it-germanys-most-expensive-woodland-rwe-ceo
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. C. (2014). Nature’s trust: Environmental law for a new ecological age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, G., & Coghe, P. (2018). Lignite Retreat: RWE’s Short-Term Pain, Long-Term Gain. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Guo, J., Xiong, M., & Yuan, J. (2017). The economics of coal power generation in China. Energy Policy, 105, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar