Climate change and fossil fuel production cuts: assessing global supply-side constraints and policy implications

References

• Asheim, G. B., Fæhn, T., Nyborg, K., Greaker, M., Hagem, C., Harstad, B., … Rosendahl, K. E. (2019). The case for a supply-side climate treaty. Science, 365(6451), 325–327. doi: 10.1126/science.aax5011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, G., & Lahn, B. (2019). From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy. Climate Policy, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1692774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, N., McGlade, C., Hilaire, J., & Ekins, P. (2018). Divestment prevails over the green paradox when anticipating strong future climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 8(2), 130–134. doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondeel, M., & Van de Graaf, T. (2018). Toward a global coal mining moratorium? A comparative analysis of coal mining policies in the USA, China, India and Australia. Climatic Change, 150, 89–101. doi: 10.1007/s10584-017-2135-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge, G., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Oil. Cambrige, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Chanis, J. (2012). Crude oil is not fungible, where it comes from does matter, and global markets are more fragmented than many think. American Foreign Policy Interests, 34(3), 144–148. doi: 10.1080/10803920.2012.686726
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K., & Stanway, D. (2016, January 17). China ban on new coal mines barely scratches the surface of tackling capacity. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/china-coal-production-idUSL3N14Q1BP
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. D. (2014). The emperor has no clothes: The limits of OPEC in the global oil market. International Organization, 68(3), 599–632. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. (2014). Closing coal: Economic and moral incentives. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 492–512. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/gru024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulomb, R., & Henriet, F. (2018). The Grey Paradox: How fossil-fuel owners can benefit from carbon taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87, 206–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donadio, R. & Meyer, R. (2018, December 8). France’s ‘yellow vest’ protesters aren’t against climate action. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/12/france-yellow-vest-climate-action/577642/
   Google Scholar
• EJAtlas. (2018). Retrieved from https://ejatlas.org/featured/blockadia
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, P., Lazarus, M., & Piggot, G. (2018). Limiting fossil fuel production as the next big step in climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 8, 1037–1043. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0337-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen, D., & Brown-Steiner, B. (2018). Public perception of the relationship between climate change and unconventional gas development (‘fracking’) in the US. Climate Policy, 18(5), 556–567. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1389686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fæhn, T., Hagem, C., Lindholt, L., Maeland, S., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2017). Climate policies in a fossil fuel producing country: Demand versus supply side policies. Energ J, 38(1), 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. (2018). The logic of fossil fuel bans. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 449–451. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0172-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Denniss, R. (2018). Cutting with both arms of the scissors: The economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies. Climatic Change, 150(1–2), 73–87. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2162-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagem, C., & Storrøsten, H. B. (2019). Supply- versus demand-side policies in the presence of carbon leakage and the Green Paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 121(1), 379–406. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Pollin, R. (2018). Economics and climate justice activism: Assessing the fossil fuel divestment movement. PERI.
   Google Scholar
• Harring, N., Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2019). The significance of political culture, economic context and instrument type for climate policy support: A cross-national study. Climate Policy, 19(5), 636–650. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1547181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. (2015). International carbon trade and domestic climate politics. Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), 27–48. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, L., Cadan, Y., Brooks, R., Rafalowicz, A., & Fleishman, B. (2018). 1000 divestment commitments and counting. Retrieved from https://gofossilfree.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/1000divest-WEB-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. J., & Renner, M. (2019). Conservative political parties and energy transitions in Europe: Opposition to climate mitigation policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 419–428. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., & Emel, J. (2009). Fixed minerals, scalar politics: The weight of scale in conflicts over the ‘1872 mining law’ in the United States. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(2), 371–388. doi: 10.1068/a40166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAP. (2019). Emissions trading worldwide: Status report 2019. Berlin: International Carbon Action Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Kartha, S., Caney, S., Dubash, N. K., & Muttitt, G. (2018). Whose carbon is burnable? Equity considerations in the allocation of a “right to extract”. Climatic Change, 150(1–2), 117–129. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2209-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaudt, D. W. (2018). Can Canada's “living tree” constitution and lessons from foreign climate litigation seed climate justice and remedy climate change? Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 31(3), 185–243.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, M., & van Asselt, H. (2018). Fossil fuel supply and climate policy: Exploring the road less taken. Climatic Change, 150(1–2), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10584-018-2266-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Billon, P., & Kristoffersen, B. (2019). Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition. Environ Plann A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreary, T., & Turner, J. (2018). The contested scales of indigenous and settler jurisdiction: Unist’ot’en struggles with Canadian pipeline governance. Studies in Political Economy, 99(3), 223–245. doi: 10.1080/07078552.2018.1536367
   Google Scholar
• McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190. doi: 10.1038/nature14016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelsen, A. (2018, November 13). Spain plans switch to 100% renewable electricity by 2050. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., & Simms, A. (2019). Towards a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty. Climate Policy, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Offshore Technology. (2018, July 3). Countries working towards ending oil exploration. Retrieved from https://www.offshore-technology.com/features/countries-ending-oil-exploration/
   Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Transnational climate litigation: The contribution of the global south. American Journal of International Law, 113(4), 679–726. doi: 10.1017/ajil.2019.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggot, G. (2018). The influence of social movements on policies that constrain fossil fuel supply. Climate Policy, 18(7), 942–954. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1394255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggot, G., Boyland, M., Down, A., & Torre, A. R. (2019). Realizing a just and equitable transition away from fossil fuels. Stockholm Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Piggot, G., Erickson, P., van Asselt, H., & Lazarus, M. (2018). Swimming upstream: Addressing fossil fuel supply under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 18(9), 1189–1202. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1494535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povitkina, M. (2018). The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, T., Manno, J. P., & Martin, P. L. (2015). Ending the fossil fuel era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rennkamp, B. (2019). Power, coalitions and institutional change in South African climate policy. Climate Policy, 19(6), 756–770. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1591936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. L. (2012). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V., & Ku, C. (2018). Climate change and the UN Security Council. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• SEI, IISD, ODI, Climate Analytics, CICERO, and UNEP. (2019). The production gap: The discrepancy between countries’ planned fossil fuel production and global production levels consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C or 2°C. Retrieved from http://productiongap.org/
   Google Scholar
• Selby, J. (2019). The Trump presidency, climate change, and the prospect of a disorderly energy transition. Review of International Studies, 45(3), 471–490. doi: 10.1017/S0260210518000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzer, J., & Vanhala, L. C. (2019). Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10, e580. doi: 10.1002/wcc.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinn, H. W. (2012). The Green Paradox: A supply-side approach to global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S. J., Agrawal, S., Mikha, D., Vitamerry, K., Le Billon, P., Veiga, M., … Paul, B. (2018). Phasing out mercury? Ecological economics and Indonesia's small-scale gold mining sector. Ecological Economics, 144, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, L., Del Bene, D., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2015). Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: The EJAtlas. Journal of Political Ecology, 22(1), 255–278. doi: 10.2458/v22i1.21108
   Google Scholar
• Trinks, A., Scholtens, B., Mulder, M., & Dam, L. (2018). Fossil fuel divestment and portfolio performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 740–748. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (1962). Resolution 1803.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T. (2017). Is OPEC dead? Oil exporters, the Paris agreement and the transition to a post-carbon world. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, H. (2019). Climate change mitigation and the UN Security Council: A just war analysis. In J. Kling (Ed.), Pacifism, politics, and feminism (pp. 117–136). Brill Rodopi.
   Google Scholar