Climate change policy networks: connecting adaptation and mitigation in multiplex networks in Peru

References

• Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of deja vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., & Garas, A. (2018). Multiplex and multilevel networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 632–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357, eaan1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö, & Prell, C. (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon – On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76, 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Vaughter, P. (2014). Inter-disciplinary analysis of climate change and society: A network approach. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, A. Rechkemmer, & E. A. Duke (Eds.), Understanding society and natural resources (pp. 203–228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M. (2014). National REDD+ policy networks: From cooperation to conflict. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Carmenta, R. (2014). REDD+ policy networks: Exploring actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24, 875–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butts, C. T., Morris, M., Krivitsky, P. N., Almquist, Z., Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., … de-Moll, S. B. (2015). Introduction to exponential-family random graph (ERG or p*) modeling with ergm. CRAN project. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ergm/vignettes/ergm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calliari, E., Michetti, M., Farnia, L., & Ramieri, E. (2019). A network approach for moving from planning to implementation in climate change adaptation: Evidence from southern Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 93, 146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. (2000). Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal, 28, 502–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L., & Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2, 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M., & Lazer, D. M. (2004). Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? The Journal of Politics, 66, 224–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., & Vertinsky, I. (2000). Policy networks and firm behaviours: Governance systems and firm reponses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy Sciences, 33, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., Abbott, K. W., Beisheim, M., Hoffmann, M., … Widerberg, O. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6, 466–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazarin, F., Locatelli, B., & Garay-Rodríguez, M. (2014). Mitigación en la selva, adaptación en la sierra y la costa: Oportunidades perdidas de sinergias frente al cambio climático en Perú? Ambiente y Desarrollo, 18, 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. H. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 114–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer, S. J., & Desmarais, B. A. (2011). Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis, 19, 66–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csardi, G. (2018). igraph: Routines for simple graphs and network analysis, version 1.2.2. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=igraph
   Google Scholar
• De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Omodei, E., Gómez, S., & Arenas, A. (2015). Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes. Nature Communications, 6, 6868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hertog, L., & Stross, S. (2013). Coherence in EU external relations: Concepts and legal rooting of an ambiguous term. European Foreign Affairs Review, 18, 373–388.
   Google Scholar
• Dickison, M. E., Magnani, M., & Rossi, L. (2016). Multilayer social networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., … Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., … Kusumadewi, S. D. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelle, M., Henschel, C., Smith, J., Tollefson, C., & Wellstead, A. (2012). New governance arrangements at the intersection of climate change and forest policy: Institutional, political and regulatory dimensions. Public Administration, 90, 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2017). Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., & Sciarini, P. (2015). Unpacking reputational power: Intended and unintended determinants of the assessment of actors’ power. Social Networks, 42, 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., Crona, B., Österblom, H., Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2012). Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries—Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 81, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallemore, C., Di Gregorio, M., Moeliono, M., & Brockhaus, M. (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11, 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebara, M. F., Fatorelli, L., May, P., & Zhang, S. (2014). REDD+ policy networks in Brazil: Constraints and opportunities for successful policy making. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghariblou, S., Salehi, M., Magnani, M., & Jalili, M. (2017). Shortest paths in multiplex networks. Scientific Reports, 7, 2142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Social networks: A developing paradigm (pp. 347–367). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. (1993). Structural power: The limits of neorealist power analysis. International Organization, 47, 443–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N. (2017). What is adaptation to climate change? Epistemic ambiguity in the climate finance system. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17, 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M., Krivitsky, P. N., Bender-deMoll, S., & Morris, M. (2016). Package ‘Statnet’: Software tools for the statistical analysis of network data, version 2016.9. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=statnet
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, M. T. (2014). Multiplex networks and interest group influence reputation: An exponential random graph model. Social Networks, 36, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. (2011). Network structures within policy processes: Coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 435–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. (2017). How to create and preserve social capital in climate adaptation policies: A network approach. Ecological Economics, 131, 414–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., & Leifeld, P. (2014). Structural and institutional determinants of influence reputation: A comparison of collaborative and adversarial policy networks in decision making and implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2, 203–271.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (1993). Networks of elite structure and decision making. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke, D. (1994). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kongsager, R., Locatelli, B., & Chazarin, F. (2016). Addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation together: A global assessment of agriculture and forestry projects. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s00267-00015-00605-y
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, J., & Daraganova, G. (2012). Exponential random graph model fundamentals. In D. Lusher, G. Robins, & J. Koskinen (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 49–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., & Jegen, M. (2001). The Swiss energy policy elite: The actor constellation of a policy domain in transition. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 251–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, T., Narayanan, M., & Ravindran, B. (2019). Effect of inter-layer coupling on multilayer network centrality measures. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 99, 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: Univ of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2019). Network comparison of socialization, learning and collaboration in the C40 cities climate group. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21, 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, I. W., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration networks in economic development policy: An exponential random graph model analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 40, 547–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 731–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B. (2011). Synergies between adaptation and mitigation in a nutshell. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research. doi: 10.17528/cifor/003619
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B., Catterall, C. P., Imbach, P., Kumar, C., Lasco, R., Marín-Spiotta, E., … Uriarte, M. (2015a). Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon. Restoration Ecology, 23, 337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B., Evans, V., Wardell, A., Andrade, A., & Vignola, R. (2011). Forests and climate change in Latin America: Linking adaptation and mitigation. Forests, 2, 431–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B., Fedele, G., Fayolle, V., & Baglee, A. (2016). Synergies between adaptation and mitigation in climate change finance. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8, 112–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B., Pavageau, C., Pramova, E., & Di Gregorio, M. (2015b). Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: Opportunities and trade-offs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. (2007). Familiarity breeds trust: Collective action in a policy domain. The Journal of Politics, 69, 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., & Robins, G. (2012). Formation of social network structure. In D. Lusher, G. Robins, & J. Koskinen (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 16–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, R. R., McCrea, R., & Lubell, M. N. (2014). Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 527–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menton, M., Perla, J., Sotes, J., & Fatorelli, L. (2014). Analysis of REDD+ policy networks in Peru. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Occasional Paper no. 106, Bogor, Indonesia. doi: 10.17528/cifor/004438
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H. (2017). Evolving polycentric governance of the Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E3013–E3021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., & Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: Sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8, e479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., Phelps, J., … Hughes, T. P. (2019). The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 57, 101934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22, 395–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberlack, C. (2017). Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22, 805–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver-Smith, A. (2014). Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in Highland Peru. In B. C. Glavovic & G. P. Smith (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: Lessons from natural hazards planning (pp. 77–99). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å. (2013). Different perspectives on EPI. In K. Eckerberg & M. Nilsson (Eds.), Environmental policy integration in practice: Shaping institutions for learning (pp. 45–68). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. T., Moeliono, M., Locatelli, B., Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M., & Mardiah, S. (2014). Integration of adaptation and mitigation in climate change and forest policies in Indonesia and Vietnam. Forests, 5, 2016–2036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, J., Skovgaard, J., Kim, S., Roberts, J. T., Rossati, D., Stadelmann, M., & Reich, H. (2015). Acting on climate finance pledges: Inter-agency dynamics and relationships with aid in contributor states. World Development, 68, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke Jr, R., Prins, G., Rayner, S., & Sarewitz, D. (2007). Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, 445, 597–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piu, H. C., & Menton, M. (2014). The context of REDD+ in Peru: Drivers, agents and institutions. CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 106, Bogor, Indonesia. doi: 10.17528/cifor/004438
   Google Scholar
• Pramova, E., Di Gregorio, M., & Locatelli, B. (2015). Integrating adaptation and mitigation in climate change and land-use policies in Peru. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
   Google Scholar
• Quintane, E., Carnabuci, G., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2012). How do brokers broker? An investigation of the temporality of structural holes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2012(1), 11234.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R version 3.5.1 (2018-07-02). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robins, G., & Lusher, D. (2012). What are exponential random graph models? In D. Lusher, G. Robins, & J. Koskinen (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 9–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russel, D., Turnpenny, J., & Jordan, A. (2018). Mainstreaming the environment through appraisal: Integrative governance or logics of disintegration? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36, 1355–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, N. M., & Fleig, A. (2018). Global patterns of national climate policies: Analyzing 171 country portfolios on climate policy integration. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobie, M. (2016). Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science & Policy, 58, 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, S., & Dhakal, S. (2019). An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 235, 535–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Calvin, K., Nkem, J., Campbell, D., Cherubini, F., Grassi, G., … Arneth, A. (2019). Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land-degradation and desertification? Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ribalta, A., De Domenico, M., Gómez, S., & Arenas, A. (2014). Centrality rankings in multiplex networks, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science. ACM, pp. 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Thomas, A. D., Spracklen, D. V., Chesterman, S., Speranza, C. I., … Kopolo, G. (2012). Challenges and opportunities in linking carbon sequestration, livelihoods and ecosystem service provision in drylands. Environmental Science and Policy, 19–20, 121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, R., & Raes, F. (2007). Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: Mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? Climate Policy, 7, 288–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38, 553–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2017). Decision 4/CP.23 Koronivia joint work on agriculture. Bonn, Germany: United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Vignola, R., McDaniels, T. L., & Scholz, R. W. (2013). Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 31, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., & Dabelko, G. D. (2007). Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change, 17, 349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33, 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S.-J., Ku, D., & Han, J.-Y. (2014). Climate policy networks in South Korea: Alliances and conflicts. Climate Policy, 14, 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, A., & Battiston, S. (2016). The multiplex network of EU lobby organizations. PLoS ONE, 11, e0158062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar