References
- Aamodt, S., & Stensdal, I. (2017). Seizing policy windows: Policy influence of climate advocacy coalitions in Brazil, China, and India, 2000–2015. Global Environmental Change, 46, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.006
- Andersen, M. S. (2019). The politics of carbon taxation: How varieties of policy style matter. Environmental Politics, 28(6), 1084–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1625134
- Ball, J. (2018). Why carbon pricing Isn't Working: Good Idea in theory, failing in Practice. Foreign Affairs, 97, 134. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-06-14/why-carbonpricing-isnt-working
- Baranzini, A., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., & Roca, J. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: Seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8, e462.
- Bataille, C. G. F. (2020). Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11.https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.633.
- Bataille, C., Waisman, H., Colombier, M., Segafredo, L., Williams, J., & Jotzo, F. (2016). The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(sup1), S7–S26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005
- Clulow, Z. (2019). Democracy, electoral systems and emissions: Explaining when and why democratization promotes mitigation. Climate Policy, 19(2), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1497938
- Dorsch, M. J., Flachsland, C., & Kornek, U. (2019). Building and enhancing climate policy ambition with transfers: Allowance allocation and revenue spending in the EU ETS. Environmental Politics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1659576
- Downie, C. (2017). Business actors, political resistance, and strategies for policymakers. Energy Policy, 108, 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.018
- Ekins, P., & Speck, S. (2000). Proposals of environmental fiscal reforms and the obstacles to their implementation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/714038548
- Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against Low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the Multi-level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627
- Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., & Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015
- Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760
- Green, J. (2019). It’s Time to Abandon Carbon Pricing. https://jacobinmag.com/2019/09/carbon-pricing-green-new-deal-fossil-fuel-environment
- Harrison, K. (2012). A tale of two taxes: The fate of environmental tax reform in Canada. Review of Policy Research, 29(3), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00565.x
- Harrison, K., & Sundstrom, L. M. (2007). The Comparative politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.1
- Heggelund, G., Stensdal, I., Duan, M., & Wettestad, J. (2019). China’s development of ETS as a GHG mitigating policy tool: A Case of policy diffusion or domestic drivers? Review of Policy Research, 36(2), 168–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12328
- Hess, D. J. (2014). Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective. Research Policy, 43(2), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008
- Houle, D., Lachapelle, E., & Purdon, M. (2015). Comparative politics of sub-federal cap-and-trade: Implementing the Western climate Initiative. Global Environmental Politics, 15(3), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00311
- Isoaho, K., & Markard, J. (in press). The politics of technology decline: Discursive struggles over coal phase-out in the UK. Review of Policy Research.https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12370.
- Jaccard, M. (2016). Want an effective climate policy? Heed the evidence. Policy Options.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
- Johnstone, P., Rogge, K. S., Kivimaa, P., Fratini, C. F., Primmer, E., & Stirling, A. (2020). Waves of disruption in clean energy transitions: Sociotechnical dimensions of system disruption in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 59, 101287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101287
- Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019). Why does emissions trading under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Climate Policy, 19(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145
- Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
- Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2018). Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.001
- Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
- Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
- Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
- Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., Nykvist, B., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
- Langhelle, O., Meadowcroft, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2019). Politics and technology: Deploying the state to accelerate socio-technical transitions for sustainability (pp. 239–259). Edward Elgar Publishing.https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975209.00024.
- Lauber, V., & Jacobsson, S. (2016). The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables - The German renewable energy Act. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.005
- Lindberg, M. B. (2019). The EU emissions trading system and renewable energy policies: Friends or Foes in the European policy Mix? Politics and Governance, 7(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1800
- Lindberg, M. B., Markard, J., & Andersen, A. D. (2019). Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU's energy policy mix. Research Policy, 48(10), 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
- Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
- Madeira, M. A. (2016). New trade, new politics: Intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4), 677–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1218354
- Markard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3(8), 628–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7
- Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change – advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003
- Markussen, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2005). Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy, 33(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00238-6
- Martin, R., Muûls, M., De Preux, L. B., & Wagner, U. J. (2014). Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2482–2508. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2482
- Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
- Meckling, J. (2011). The Globalization of carbon trading: Transnational business coalitions in climate politics. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00052
- Meckling, J. (2015). Oppose, support, or hedge? Distributional effects, regulatory pressure, and business strategy in environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00296
- Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., & Zysman, J. (2015). Winning coalitions for climate policy. Science, 349(6253), 1170–1171. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1336
- Patt, A., & Lilliestam, J. (2018). The case against carbon prices. Joule, 2(12), 2494–2498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.018
- Raven, R., Kern, F., Smith, A., Jacobsson, S., & Verhees, B. (2016). The politics of innovation spaces for low-carbon energy: Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.008
- Rennkamp, B. (2019). Power, coalitions and institutional change in South African climate policy. Climate Policy, 19(6), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1591936
- Rinscheid, A., Eberlein, B., Emmenegger, P., & Schneider, V. (in press). Why do junctures become critical? Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective. Regulation & Governance.https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12238.
- Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner, & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change - resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press, Columbus.
- Roberts, C., & Geels, F. W. (2019). Conditions for politically accelerated transitions: Historical institutionalism, the multi-level perspective, and two historical case studies in transport and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019.
- Rosenbloom, D. (2017). Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 43, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.011
- Rosenbloom, D. (2018). Framing low-carbon pathways: A discursive analysis of contending storylines surrounding the phase-out of coal-fired power in Ontario. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.003
- Rosenbloom, D. (2019). A clash of socio-technical systems: Exploring actor interactions around electrification and electricity trade in unfolding low-carbon pathways for Ontario. Energy Research and Social Science, 49, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.015
- Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient — and how “sustainability transition policy” can help mitigate climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004093117
- Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Cashore, B. (2019). Stability and climate policy? Harnessing insights on path dependence, policy feedback, and transition pathways. Energy Research and Social Science, 50, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.009
- Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2017). Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics. Nature Energy, 2(6), 17084. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.84
- Selby, J. (2019). The Trump presidency, climate change, and the prospect of a disorderly energy transition. Review of International Studies, 45(3), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000165
- Skovgaard, J., Ferrari, S. S., & Knaggård, Å. (2019). Mapping and clustering the adoption of carbon pricing policies: What polities price carbon and why? Climate Policy, 19(9), 1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1641460
- Steen, M., & Weaver, T. (2017). Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy, 46(6), 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.001
- Stiglitz, J. E., Stern, N., Duan, M., Edenhofer, O., Giraud, G., Heal, G. M., la Rovere, E. L., Morris, A., Moyer, E., & Pangestu, M. (2017). Report of the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington D.C.
- Tvinnereim, E., & Mehling, M. (2018). Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation. Energy Policy, 121, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020
- Vona, F. (2019). Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: Why the ‘job-killing’ argument is so persistent and how to overturn it. Climate Policy, 19(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1532871
- von Maravic, P. (2012). Limits of knowing or the consequences of difficult-access problems for multi-method research and public policy. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9147-9
- Waisman, H., Bataille, C., Winkler, H., Jotzo, F., Shukla, P., Colombier, M., Buira, D., Criqui, P., Fischedick, M., Kainuma, M., La Rovere, E., Pye, S., Safonov, G., Siagian, U., Teng, F., Virdis, M.-R., Williams, J., Young, S., Anandarajah, G., … Trollip, H. (2019). A pathway design framework for national low greenhouse gas emission development strategies. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0442-8
- Wettestad, J. (2009). EU energy-intensive industries and emission trading: Losers becoming winners? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(5), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.516
- Wettestad, J., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2017). The evolution of carbon markets: Design and diffusion. Routledge.
- Wettestad, J., & Jevnaker, T. (2017). Ratcheting up carbon trade: The politics of reforming EU emissions trading. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00403