References
- Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. (2018). The oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
- Baekkeskov, E., & Öberg, P. (2017). Freezing deliberation through public expert advice. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 1006–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1170192
- Beauvais, E. (2019). Discursive inequity and the internal exclusion of women speakers. Political Research Quarterly, 1–14. https://doi.org/1065912919870605
- Brown, M. B. (2014). Expertise and deliberative democracy. In Elstub, Stephen and McLaverty, Peter. deliberative democracy: Issues and cases (pp. 50–68). Edinburgh University Press.
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2
- Carroll, R. (2019). Ireland to Unveil Bold Plan to Tackle climate emergency. The Guardian, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/17/ireland-to-unveil-bold-plan-to-tackle-climate-emergency
- Citizens’ Assembly. (2018). “Third Report and Recommendations of the Citizens’ Assembly: How the State can make Ireland a leader in tackling climate change.” Available at: https://www.citizensassembly.ie/en/how-the-state-can-make-ireland-a-leader-in-tackling-climate-change/final-report-on-how-the-state-can-make-ireland-a-leader-in-tackling-climate-change/climate-change-report-final.pdf
- Coleman, M., Devaney, L., Torney, D., & Brereton, P. (2019, June 27). Ireland’s world-leading citizens’ climate assembly. What worked? What didn’t? Climate Change News. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/27/irelands-world-leading-citizens-climate-assembly-worked-didnt/
- Corner, A., Shaw, C., & Clarke, J. (2018). Principles for effective communication and public engagement on climate change: A handbook for IPCC authors. Climate Outreach.
- Dabry, M. (2019, June 18). Ireland to ‘nudge’ its way to net zero emissions by 2050. Climate Home News. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/18/ireland-nudge-way-net-zero-emissions-2050/
- Devaney, L., Brereton, P., Torney, D., Coleman, M., Boussalis, C., & Coan, T. (2020). Environmental literacy and deliberative democracy: A content analysis of written submissions to the Irish citizens’ assembly on climate change. Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02707-4.
- Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
- Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
- Dusa, A. (2019). QCA with R. A comprehensive resource. Springer International Publishing.
- Ernst, N., Kühne, R., & Wirth, W. (2017). Effects of message repetition and negativity on credibility judgments and political attitudes. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3265–3285.
- Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., & Harris, C. (2019). Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2018.1534832
- Fournier, P., van der Kolk, H., Kenneth Carty, R., Blais, A., & Rose, J. (2011). When citizens decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform. Oxford University Press.
- Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
- Goodin, R. E., & Niemeyer, S. J. (2003). When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
- Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.
- Harring, N., Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2019). Higher education, norm development, and environmental protection. Higher Education, 79, 291–305.
- Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067.
- Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
- Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
- Kearney, A. R. (1994). Understanding global change: A cognitive perspective on communicating through stories. Climatic Change, 27(4), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096270
- Lockwood, M. (2011). Does the framing of climate policies make a difference to public support? Evidence from UK marginal constituencies. Climate Policy, 11(4), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.579301
- McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
- Moezzi, M., Janda, K. B., & Rotmann, S. (2017). Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Research and Social Science, 31(May), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.034
- Muradova, L. (2020). Seeing the other Side? Perspective-taking and reflective political judgements in interpersonal deliberation. Political Studies, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916605.
- Niemeyer, S. J. (2013). Democracy and climate change: What can deliberative democracy contribute?. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12025
- Oana, I.-E., & Schneider, C. Q. (2018). Set methods: An add-on package for advanced QCA. The R Journal [online]. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2018/RJ-2018-031/index.html
- O’Malley, E., Farrell, D. M., & Suiter, J. (2019). Does talking matter? A quasi-experiment assessing the impact of deliberation and information on opinion change. International Political Science Review, 41(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118824459
- O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). ‘Fear won’t do It’ visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
- Ragin, C. C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
- Roberts, J. J., Lightbody, R., Low, R., & Elstub, S. (2020). Experts and evidence in deliberation: Scrutinising the role of witnesses and evidence in mini-publics, a case study. Policy Sciences, 53, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09367-x
- Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
- Shaw, C., & Corner, A. (2017). Using narrative workshops to socialise the climate debate: Lessons from two case studies – centre-right audiences and the scottish public. Energy Research and Social Science, 31(August), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.029
- Smith, G., & Setälä, M. (2018). Mini-publics and deliberative democracy. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge University Press.
- Suldovsky, B. (2017, September 26). The information deficit model and climate change communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-301.
- Torney, D., & O’Gorman, R. (2019). A laggard in good times and Bad? The limited impact of EU membership on Ireland’s climate change and environmental policy. Irish Political Studies, 34(4), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2019.1647174
- Whitmarsh, L., & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008