References
- Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
- Bell, A., Fairbrother, M., & Jones, K. (2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x
- Chaisty, P., & Whitefield, S. (2015). Attitudes towards the environment: Are post-Communist societies (still) different? Environmental Politics, 24(4), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1023575
- Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/317987
- Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2010). Does democracy produce quality of government? European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01906.x
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
- Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.830468
- Davidovic, D., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2019). The contingent effects of environmental concern and ideology: Institutional context and people’s willingness to pay environmental taxes. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 674–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882
- Eom, K., Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Ishii, K. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616660078
- ESS Round 8: European Social Survey Round 8 Data. (2016). Data file edition 2.1. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
- European Social Survey. (2016). ESS round 8 source questionnaire. ESS ERIC Headquarters c/o City University London.
- Fairbrother, M. (2016). Trust and public support for environmental protection in diverse national contexts. Sociological Science, 3, 359–382. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a17
- Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003
- Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate Policy, 5(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582
- Harring, N. (2014). Corruption, inequalities and the perceived effectiveness of economic pro-environmental policy instruments: A European cross-national study. Environmental Science & Policy, 39, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.011
- Harring, N. (2016). Reward or punish? Understanding preferences toward economic or regulatory instruments in a cross-national perspective. Political Studies, 64(3), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12209
- Harring, N. (2018). Trust and state intervention: Results from a Swedish survey on environmental policy support. Environmental Science & Policy, 82, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.002
- Harring, N., & Jagers, S. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010210
- Harrison, K. (2010). The comparative politics of carbon taxation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131545
- Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.
- Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
- Hughes, J. E., & Podolefsky, M. (2015). Getting green with solar subsidies: Evidence from the California solar initiative. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(2), 235–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/681131
- IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
- Jagers, S. C., Löfgren, Å, & Stripple, J. (2010). Attitudes to personal carbon allowances: Political trust, fairness and ideology. Climate Policy, 10(4), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0673
- Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2018). A little more action, please: Increasing the understanding about citizens’ lack of commitment to protecting the environment in different national contexts. International Journal of Sociology, 48(4), 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2018.1515703
- Kollmann, A., & Reichl, J. (2015). How trust in governments influences the acceptance of environmental taxes. In F. Schneider, A. Kollmann, & J. Reichl (Eds.), Political economy and instruments of environmental politics (pp. 53–70). The MIT Press.
- Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
- Konisky, D. M., Milyo, J., & Richardson, L. E. (2008). Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 89(5), 1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00574.x
- Kulin, J., & Johansson Sevä, I. (2019). The role of government in protecting the environment: Quality of government and the translation of normative views about government responsibility into spending preferences. International Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2019.1582964
- Kumlin, S. (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kyselá, E., Ščasný, M., & Zvěřinová, I. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: A review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate Policy, 19(7), 878–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1611534
- Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
- Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
- McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358.
- Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2009). A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methods, 3(1), 45–58. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1041001
- Murray, B., & Rivers, N. (2015). British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy, 86, 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
- Newton, K., Stolle, D., & Zmerli, S. (2018). Social and political trust. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (pp. 1–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/
- O’Gorman, M., & Jotzo, F. (2014). Impact of the carbon price on Australia’s electricity demand, supply and emissions (Working Paper No. 1411). Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, July 2014.
- Pisano, I., & Lubell, M. (2017). Environmental behavior in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environment and Behavior, 49(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515600494
- Rhodes, E., Axsen, J., & Jaccard, M. (2017). Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecological Economics, 137, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027
- Rose, R., & Mishler, W. (2011). Political trust and distrust in post-authoritarian contexts. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust: why context matters (pp. 1–117). ECPR Press.
- Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209338795
- Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press.
- Rothstein, B. O., & Teorell, J. A. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
- Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00148.x
- Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12140
- Smith, E. K., & Mayer, A. (2018). A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Global Environmental Change, 49, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.014
- Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.
- Svallfors, S. (2013). Government quality, egalitarianism, and attitudes to taxes and social spending: A European comparison. European Political Science Review, 5(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391200015X
- Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
- Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019
- van der Meer, T. (2017). Dissecting the causal chain from quality of government to political support. In C. van Ham, J. A. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and reality of the legitimacy crisis: Explaining trends and cross-national differences in established democracies (p. 136). Oxford University Press.
- Whitmarsh, L., Upham, P., Poortinga, W., McLachlan, C., Darnton, A., Devine-Wright, P., Demski, C., & Sherry-Brennan, F. (2011). Public attitudes, understanding, and engagement in relation to low-carbon energy: a selective review of academic and non-academic literatures. Report for the RCUK Energy Programme.
- Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2017). Objects of political and social trust: Scales and hierarchies. Handbook on Political Trust, 104–124. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00017