The making of green steel in the EU: a policy evaluation for the early commercialization phase

References

• Åhman, M. (2006). Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan. Energy Policy, 34(4), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhman, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2015). Decarbonising industry in the EU – Climate, trade and industrial policy strategies. In S. Oberthur & C. Dupont (Eds.), Decarbonisation in the European Union: Internal policies and external strategies (pp. 92–114). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. M., & Cullen, J. M. (2012). Sustainable materials: With both eyes open. UIT Cambridge Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J. M., Gutowski, T. G., Serrenho, A. C., Skelton, A. C. H., & Worrell, E. (2017). Industry 1.61803: The transition to an industry with reduced material demand fit for a low carbon future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160361. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, F. N. G. (2020). Effects on the manufacturing, utility and construction industries of decarbonization of the energy-intensive and natural resource-based industries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvizu, D., Bruckner, T., Chum, H., Edenhofer, O., Estefen, S., Faaij, A., Fischedick, M., Hansen, G., Hiriart, G., Hohmeyer, O., Hollands, K. G. T., Huckerby, J., Kadner, S., Killingtveit, Å, Kumar, A., Lewis, A., Lucon, O., Matschoss, P., Maurice, L., … Zwickel, T. (2011). Technical Summary. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, & T. Zwickel (Eds.), IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation (pp. 1–132). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C. G. F. (2019). Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. WIREs Climate Change, 2019, e633. https://doi.org/10.102/wcc.633
   Google Scholar
• Beise, M. (2005). Lead markets, innovation differentials and growth. International Economics and Economic Policy, 1(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-004-0013-x
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Market Watch. (2016). Industry windfall profits from Europe’s carbon market.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper-Searle, S., Livesey, F., & Allwood, J. M. (2018). Why are material efficiency solutions a limited part of the climate policy agenda? An application of the multiple streams framework to UK policy on CO2 emissions from cars. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daehn, K. E., Cabrera Serrenho, A., & Allwood, J. M. (2017). How will copper contamination constrain future global steel recycling? Environmental Science & Technology, 51(11), 6599–6606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2017). Making public procurement work in and for Europe (vol. 572).
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2019). The European green deal.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2020). A new industrial strategy for Europe, COM(2020) 102 final.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2011). The politics of carbon leakage and the fairness of border measures. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(4), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00277.x
   Google Scholar
• EEA. (2018, December 11). EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) data viewer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/emissions-trading-viewer-1
   Google Scholar
• Elkerbout, M., & Egenhofer, C. (2018). Tools to boost investment in low-carbon technologies: Five possible ways to create low-carbon markets in the EU. CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2009). Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofer. (2013). A steel roadmap for a low carbon Europe 2050.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofer. (2019a). European steel in figures 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofer. (2019b). Low carbon roadmap: Pathways to a CO2-neutral European steel industry.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofer. (2020). EU green deal on steel: EU climate leadership requires waterproof carbon leakage measures (vol. 3).
   Google Scholar
• Fleiter, T., Herbst, A., Rehfeldt, M., & Arens, M. (2019). Industrial innovation part 2: Scenario analysis and pathways to deep decarbonisation. Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Gambhir, A. (2019). Transitional assistance policies for just, equitable and smooth low-carbon transitions: Who, what and how? Climate Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1657379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D., & Hepburn, C. (2005). Carbon contracts and energy policy: An outline proposal. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C. (2006). Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: A review of instrument choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A. G., Cooper-Searle, S., Skelton, A. C. H., & Cullen, J. M. (2018). Leveraging material efficiency as an energy and climate instrument for heavy industries in the EU. Energy Policy, 120, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E. G., Ali, S., Ciacci, L., Fishman, T., Heeren, N., Masanet, E., Asghari, F. N., Olivetti, E., Pauliuk, S., Tu, Q., & Wolfram, P. (2019). Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review. Environmental Research Letters, 14(4), 043004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HLG-EII. (2019). Masterplan for a competitive transformation of EU energy-intensive industries enabling a climate-neutral, circular economy by 2050.
   Google Scholar
• Hölling, M., & Gellert, S. (2018). Direct reduction: Transition from natural gas to hydrogen? [Paper presentation]. ICSTI 2018, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Massey, E., Rayner, T., van Asselt, H., Haug, C., Hildingsson, R., Monni, S., & Stripple, J. (2011). The evaluation of climate policy: Theory and emerging practice in Europe. Policy Sciences, 44(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9125-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. (2017). Renewable energy for industry.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2019.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA, IEA & REN21. (2018). Renewable energy policies in a time of transition.
   Google Scholar
• Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2007). Border tax adjustment: A feasible way to support stringent emission trading. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8
   Google Scholar
• Jernkontoret. (2018). Klimatfärdplan – För en fossilfri och konkurrenskraftig stålindustri i Sverige. Stockholm, Sweden: Jernkontoret.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. (2017). Radical dematerialization and degrowth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160383. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir, D., Hansen, T., Vogl, V., & Åhman, M. (2020). Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: A technological innovation system (TIS) study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandova, H., Patrizio, P., Leduc, S., Kjärstad, J., Wang, C., Wetterlund, E., Kraxner, F., & Gale, W. (2019). Achieving carbon-neutral iron and steelmaking in Europe through the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclep.2019.01247 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marron, D. (2004). Greener public purchasing as an environmental policy instrument. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(4), 71–105. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v3-art23-en
   Google Scholar
• Material Economics. (2018). The circular economy: A powerful force for climate mitigation. Stockholm, Sweden: Materials Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: Context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638900300900404
   Google Scholar
• Milford, R. L., Pauliuk, S., Allwood, J. M., & Muller, D. B. (2013). The roles of energy and material efficiency in meeting steel industry CO2 targets. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(7), 3455–3462. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3031424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D., & Connor, P. M. (2006). Effectiveness through risk reduction: A comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy, 34(3), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monjon, S., & Quirion, P. (2011). Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1957–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), 102–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neij, L. (2008). Cost development of future technologies for power generation—A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments. Energy Policy, 36(6), 2200–2211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Acworth, W., Ancygier, A., Branger, F., Christmas, I., Haussner, M., Ismer, R., Rooij, A., Sartor, O., Sato, M., & Schopp, A. (2014). Carbon control and competitiveness post 2020: The steel report. London , UK: Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Chiappinelli, O., Bataille, C., Haußner, M., Ismer, R., Joltreau, E., Jürgens, I., Piantieri, C., Richstein, J., Sartor, O., Singhal, P., & Stede, J. (2018). Filling gaps in the policy package to decarbonise production and use of materials. UK, London: Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Chiappinelli, O., Gerres, T., Haussner, M., Ismer, R., May, N., Pirlot, A., & Richstein, J. (2019). Building blocks for a climate-neutral European industrial sector. UK, London: Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Okereke, C., & McDaniels, D. (2012). To what extent are EU steel companies susceptible to competitive loss due to climate policy? Energy Policy, 46, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauliuk, S., Milford, R. L., Muller, D. B., & Allwood, J. M. (2013). The steel scrap age. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(7), 3448–3454. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303149z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauliuk, S., Wang, T., & Müller, D. B. (2013). Steel all over the world: Estimating in-use stocks of iron for 200 countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 71, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, H., Neuhoff, K., & Lin, X. (2019). The impact of implementing a consumption charge on carbon-intensive materials in Europe. Climate Policy, 20, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.1605969 doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1605969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R., Walz, R., Köhler, J., & Rennings, K. (2014). The concept of “lead markets” revisited: Contribution to environmental innovation theory. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 10, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J.-A., Röhrig, K., & McLynn, M. (2018). European fat cats EU energy intensive industries: Paid to pollute, not to decarbonise. CAN Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Richstein, J. C. (2017). Project-based carbon contracts: A way to finance innovative low-carbon investments. DIW.
   Google Scholar
• Rootzén, J., & Johnsson, F. (2016). Paying the full price of steel – Perspectives on the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from the steel industry. Energy Policy, 98, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbag. (2018). EU ETS dashboard (2018 ed.). Retrieved February 20, 2019, from http://sandbag-climate.github.io/
   Google Scholar
• Sandén, B. A., & Azar, C. (2005). Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—Economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy, 33(12), 1557–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartor, O., & Bataille, C. (2019). Decarbonising basic materials in Europe: How carbon contracts-for-difference could help bring breakthrough technologies to market. IDDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi, N. (2017). Trade specialisation patterns in major steelmaking economies: The role of advanced economies and the implications for rapid growth in emerging market and developing economies in the global steel market. Mineral Economics, 30(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-017-0110-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderholm, P., & Tilton, J. E. (2012). Material efficiency: An economic perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 61, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., Sugiyama, T., Chimanikire, D., Dubash, N. K., Essandoh-Yeddu, J., Fifita, S., Goulder, L., Jaffe, A., Labandeira, X., Managi, S., Mitchell, C., Montero, J. P., Teng, F., & Zylicz, T. (2014). National and sub-national policies and institutions. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, & J. C. Minx (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toller, S., & Larsson, M. (2017). Implementation of life cycle thinking in planning and procurement at the Swedish transport administration. In Pavement life-cycle assessment – Proceedings of the pavement life-cycle assessment symposium, 2017 (pp. 281–287).
   Google Scholar
• UK BEIS. (2019). Steel public procurement – Compliance with the steel procurement guidance (PPN 11/16).
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. (2002). Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 30(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Boskaljon, W., Neelis, M. L., Saygin, D., & Patel, M. K. (2016). Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1997). Models of evaluation. In Public policy and program evaluation (pp. 35–92). Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, V., & Åhman, M. (2019). What is green steel? – Towards a strategic decision tool for decarbonising EU steel [Paper presentation]. METEC-ESTAD 2019, Düsseldorf, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, V., Åhman, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2018). Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., & Grubler, A. (2011). Lessons from the history of technological change for clean energy scenarios and policies. Natural Resources Forum, 35(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Steel Association. (2009). Statistical yearbook 2009.
   Google Scholar
• World Steel Association. (2019). Steel statistical yearbook 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wyns, T., Khandekar, G., Axelson, M., Sartor, O., & Neuhoff, K. (2019). Industrial transformation 2050: Towards an industrial strategy for a climate neutral Europe. European Climate Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Xylia, M., Silveira, S., Duerinck, J., & Meinke-Hubeny, F. (2018). Weighing regional scrap availability in global pathways for steel production processes. Energy Efficiency, 11(5), 1135–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9583-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar